Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors

In Utah, greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sage-grouse) range has been reduced to 50% of what is considered historical availability due to habitat degradation and loss. In an effort to improve sage-grouse habitat in southern Utah, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Nicole Frey, Rachel Curtis, Kevin Heaton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utah State University 2017-01-01
Series:Human-Wildlife Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol7/iss2/6
_version_ 1818391047752908800
author S. Nicole Frey
Rachel Curtis
Kevin Heaton
author_facet S. Nicole Frey
Rachel Curtis
Kevin Heaton
author_sort S. Nicole Frey
collection DOAJ
description In Utah, greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sage-grouse) range has been reduced to 50% of what is considered historical availability due to habitat degradation and loss. In an effort to improve sage-grouse habitat in southern Utah, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) conducted a tree-removal treatment in 2005. We conducted a study to determine if (a) the tree-removal treatment was effective at creating new sage-grouse habitat, and (b) if characteristics of used habitat were similar to those reported in previous literature. The treatment resulted in increased abundance of grasses and forbs. Additionally, shrub percentage cover and height was not negatively affected by the treatment. Sage-grouse used the treated areas more than expected based on availability within the first year of the treatment. The vegetation resulting from the treatment used by sage-grouse in all seasons was lower in percentage shrub, grass, forb composition, and average height than the range of previously reported habitats for late-brood rearing, fall and winter seasons of use. Sage-grouse’s quick positive response to the treated area suggests that suitable habitat is limited in this region.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:07:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76f3b2c73c3f4814bf1b809c9e953948
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2155-3874
2155-3874
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:07:19Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Utah State University
record_format Article
series Human-Wildlife Interactions
spelling doaj.art-76f3b2c73c3f4814bf1b809c9e9539482022-12-21T23:16:03ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-01-017210.26077/g24n-yp40Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factorsS. Nicole Frey0Rachel Curtis1Kevin Heaton2Utah State UniversityUtah State UniversityUtah State University Cooperative ExtensionIn Utah, greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sage-grouse) range has been reduced to 50% of what is considered historical availability due to habitat degradation and loss. In an effort to improve sage-grouse habitat in southern Utah, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) conducted a tree-removal treatment in 2005. We conducted a study to determine if (a) the tree-removal treatment was effective at creating new sage-grouse habitat, and (b) if characteristics of used habitat were similar to those reported in previous literature. The treatment resulted in increased abundance of grasses and forbs. Additionally, shrub percentage cover and height was not negatively affected by the treatment. Sage-grouse used the treated areas more than expected based on availability within the first year of the treatment. The vegetation resulting from the treatment used by sage-grouse in all seasons was lower in percentage shrub, grass, forb composition, and average height than the range of previously reported habitats for late-brood rearing, fall and winter seasons of use. Sage-grouse’s quick positive response to the treated area suggests that suitable habitat is limited in this region.https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol7/iss2/6centrocercus urophasianusgreater sage-grousehabitat usehuman–wildlife conflictsjuniper removalpinyon removalsouthern distributionutahvegetation treatment
spellingShingle S. Nicole Frey
Rachel Curtis
Kevin Heaton
Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors
Human-Wildlife Interactions
centrocercus urophasianus
greater sage-grouse
habitat use
human–wildlife conflicts
juniper removal
pinyon removal
southern distribution
utah
vegetation treatment
title Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors
title_full Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors
title_fullStr Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors
title_full_unstemmed Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors
title_short Response of a small population of greater sage-grouse to tree removal: implications of limiting factors
title_sort response of a small population of greater sage grouse to tree removal implications of limiting factors
topic centrocercus urophasianus
greater sage-grouse
habitat use
human–wildlife conflicts
juniper removal
pinyon removal
southern distribution
utah
vegetation treatment
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol7/iss2/6
work_keys_str_mv AT snicolefrey responseofasmallpopulationofgreatersagegrousetotreeremovalimplicationsoflimitingfactors
AT rachelcurtis responseofasmallpopulationofgreatersagegrousetotreeremovalimplicationsoflimitingfactors
AT kevinheaton responseofasmallpopulationofgreatersagegrousetotreeremovalimplicationsoflimitingfactors