Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure

The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological resul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takumi Takeuchi, Kenichiro Yamagishi, Kazumasa Konishi, Hideto Sano, Masato Takahashi, Shoichi Ichimura, Hitoshi Kono, Masaichi Hasegawa, Naobumi Hosogane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/629
_version_ 1797486971192344576
author Takumi Takeuchi
Kenichiro Yamagishi
Kazumasa Konishi
Hideto Sano
Masato Takahashi
Shoichi Ichimura
Hitoshi Kono
Masaichi Hasegawa
Naobumi Hosogane
author_facet Takumi Takeuchi
Kenichiro Yamagishi
Kazumasa Konishi
Hideto Sano
Masato Takahashi
Shoichi Ichimura
Hitoshi Kono
Masaichi Hasegawa
Naobumi Hosogane
author_sort Takumi Takeuchi
collection DOAJ
description The combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above–two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above–two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above–two below fixation (<i>p</i> = 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above–two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:41:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-76f4049923cb4caf84fa363a7b379d26
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:41:55Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-76f4049923cb4caf84fa363a7b379d262023-11-23T16:51:32ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-01-0111362910.3390/jcm11030629Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical ProcedureTakumi Takeuchi0Kenichiro Yamagishi1Kazumasa Konishi2Hideto Sano3Masato Takahashi4Shoichi Ichimura5Hitoshi Kono6Masaichi Hasegawa7Naobumi Hosogane8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo 181-8611, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Higashiyamato Hospital, Tokyo 207-0014, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo 181-8611, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo 181-8611, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo 181-8611, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo 181-8611, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keiyu Orthopedic Hospital, Tatebayashi 374-0013, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kugayama Hospital, Tokyo 157-0061, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo 181-8611, JapanThe combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement (VBR) using a wide footplate expandable cage with a minimally invasive lateral approach has been widely used for pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiological results of combined anteroposterior surgery using VBR and to recommend the optimal procedure. Thirty-eight elderly patients were included in this study. The mean preoperative local kyphosis angle was 29.3°, and the mean correction loss angle was 6.3°. Cage subsidence was observed in ten patients (26.3%), and UIV or LIV fracture in twelve patients (31.6%). Patients with cage subsidence were compared to those without cage subsidence to determine the causal factors. The mean number of fixed vertebrae was 5.4 vertebrae with cage subsidence and 7.4 vertebrae without cage subsidence. In addition, to precisely clarify the optimal number of fixed vertebrae, those patients with two above–two below fixation were compared to those with less than two above–two below fixation, which revealed that the correction loss angle was significantly less in two above–two below fixation (<i>p</i> = 0.016). Based on these results, we recommend at least two above–two below fixation with VBR to minimize the correction loss angle and prevent cage subsidence.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/629minimally invasive spinal treatment (MIST)osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF)combined anteroposterior fusionvertebral body replacement (VBR)wide footplate expandable cagepercutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)
spellingShingle Takumi Takeuchi
Kenichiro Yamagishi
Kazumasa Konishi
Hideto Sano
Masato Takahashi
Shoichi Ichimura
Hitoshi Kono
Masaichi Hasegawa
Naobumi Hosogane
Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
Journal of Clinical Medicine
minimally invasive spinal treatment (MIST)
osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF)
combined anteroposterior fusion
vertebral body replacement (VBR)
wide footplate expandable cage
percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)
title Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
title_full Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
title_fullStr Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
title_short Radiological Evaluation of Combined Anteroposterior Fusion with Vertebral Body Replacement Using a Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Verification of Optimal Surgical Procedure
title_sort radiological evaluation of combined anteroposterior fusion with vertebral body replacement using a minimally invasive lateral approach for osteoporotic vertebral fractures verification of optimal surgical procedure
topic minimally invasive spinal treatment (MIST)
osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF)
combined anteroposterior fusion
vertebral body replacement (VBR)
wide footplate expandable cage
percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/629
work_keys_str_mv AT takumitakeuchi radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT kenichiroyamagishi radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT kazumasakonishi radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT hidetosano radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT masatotakahashi radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT shoichiichimura radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT hitoshikono radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT masaichihasegawa radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure
AT naobumihosogane radiologicalevaluationofcombinedanteroposteriorfusionwithvertebralbodyreplacementusingaminimallyinvasivelateralapproachforosteoporoticvertebralfracturesverificationofoptimalsurgicalprocedure