Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register

Abstract Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in adults. More research is needed to establish evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to generate cost-effective and fair fracture treatment. The Swedish National Patient Register is a principal source for population-based e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanna Südow, Linda Sjödin, Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-09-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01314-0
_version_ 1797453480345993216
author Hanna Südow
Linda Sjödin
Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro
author_facet Hanna Südow
Linda Sjödin
Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro
author_sort Hanna Südow
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in adults. More research is needed to establish evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to generate cost-effective and fair fracture treatment. The Swedish National Patient Register is a principal source for population-based epidemiologic studies in Sweden. The validity of some–but not all–diagnoses in the register is high. Little is known regarding the validity of registration of distal radius fractures. A dataset of cases registered with diagnosis of distal radius fracture (S52.5) or distal radius and ulna fracture (S52.6) were collected from the Swedish National Inpatient and Outpatient Registers. Six cohorts, each containing 240 simple random samples, were constructed. Radiographic reports and medical records were reviewed to confirm or reject the diagnosis as well as, in relevant cases, the surgical intervention. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. The PPV for distal radius fracture in the register ranges between 92 and 100%, lower if coded as S52.6 and higher if there was an adherent code of surgical intervention. Codes for surgical intervention reached a PPV of 95–100%. In conclusion, the validity of the codes for diagnosis and the surgical treatment of distal radius fracture is high in the Swedish National Patient Register. According to our results, the register may be used as a reliable data source for population-based research of distal radius fractures.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:23:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-772316e505da484fa81f2e77f1ee9c63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-783X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:23:26Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-772316e505da484fa81f2e77f1ee9c632023-11-26T12:41:44ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2023-09-012811910.1186/s40001-023-01314-0Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient RegisterHanna Südow0Linda Sjödin1Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro2Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska InstituteEmergency department, Danderyd hospitalDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska InstituteAbstract Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in adults. More research is needed to establish evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to generate cost-effective and fair fracture treatment. The Swedish National Patient Register is a principal source for population-based epidemiologic studies in Sweden. The validity of some–but not all–diagnoses in the register is high. Little is known regarding the validity of registration of distal radius fractures. A dataset of cases registered with diagnosis of distal radius fracture (S52.5) or distal radius and ulna fracture (S52.6) were collected from the Swedish National Inpatient and Outpatient Registers. Six cohorts, each containing 240 simple random samples, were constructed. Radiographic reports and medical records were reviewed to confirm or reject the diagnosis as well as, in relevant cases, the surgical intervention. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. The PPV for distal radius fracture in the register ranges between 92 and 100%, lower if coded as S52.6 and higher if there was an adherent code of surgical intervention. Codes for surgical intervention reached a PPV of 95–100%. In conclusion, the validity of the codes for diagnosis and the surgical treatment of distal radius fracture is high in the Swedish National Patient Register. According to our results, the register may be used as a reliable data source for population-based research of distal radius fractures.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01314-0Distal radius fractureSwedish National Patient RegisterOutpatient RegisterInpatient RegisterValidationEpidemiology
spellingShingle Hanna Südow
Linda Sjödin
Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro
Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
European Journal of Medical Research
Distal radius fracture
Swedish National Patient Register
Outpatient Register
Inpatient Register
Validation
Epidemiology
title Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
title_full Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
title_fullStr Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
title_full_unstemmed Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
title_short Validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the Swedish National Patient Register
title_sort validity of distal radius fracture diagnoses in the swedish national patient register
topic Distal radius fracture
Swedish National Patient Register
Outpatient Register
Inpatient Register
Validation
Epidemiology
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01314-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hannasudow validityofdistalradiusfracturediagnosesintheswedishnationalpatientregister
AT lindasjodin validityofdistalradiusfracturediagnosesintheswedishnationalpatientregister
AT ceciliamellstrandnavarro validityofdistalradiusfracturediagnosesintheswedishnationalpatientregister