Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution

When discussing the issue of impunity, the ICL academia lacks attention to the concept of “impunity”. The understanding of the concept of impunity is limited to its damage to the value and function of criminal law, and ignores the ontological significance of the principle of equality to it. Therefo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hongwei Wang
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University 2023-06-01
Series:Halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦atynastar ža̋ne halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦u̇k̦yk̦ seriâsì
Online Access:http://ir-law/index.php/1-mo/article/view/1386
_version_ 1797671262349164544
author Hongwei Wang
author_facet Hongwei Wang
author_sort Hongwei Wang
collection DOAJ
description When discussing the issue of impunity, the ICL academia lacks attention to the concept of “impunity”. The understanding of the concept of impunity is limited to its damage to the value and function of criminal law, and ignores the ontological significance of the principle of equality to it. Therefore, it is impossible to explain the fundamental reason why the ICC cannot “end the history of impunity”. This paper examines the three dimensions of “impunity”. First of all, in the ontological dimension, this paper points out that impunity should be interpreted at “thick” and “thin” levels: “Thin impunity” focuses on the value and punishment function of ICL; “Thick impunity” means that the root cause of impunity is the failure to guarantee “equality before the law”. Secondly, from the perspective of epistemology, it is pointed out that the reason why the ICC can’t guarantee equality before the law lies in the “selectivity” of the court – “legal selectivity” and “political selectivity”. Finally, from the perspective of methodology, it is pointed out that the current situation of the international society in the horizontal/vertical dual structure and the structural defects of the Court decide that the ICC can’t end the impunity caused by the “absence of equality”, and advocates the introduction of the pioneering but little-known “International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG)” model, which provides an effective way to solve the problem of impunity. Key words: Impunity; Equality; ICC; Rule of Law; Selectivity; CICIG mode
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:12:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-772c7ba0295f4a4ba950904a304b9870
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1563-0285
2618-1215
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:12:51Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
record_format Article
series Halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦atynastar ža̋ne halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦u̇k̦yk̦ seriâsì
spelling doaj.art-772c7ba0295f4a4ba950904a304b98702023-09-29T06:50:10ZdeuAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityHalyk̦aralyk̦ k̦atynastar ža̋ne halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦u̇k̦yk̦ seriâsì1563-02852618-12152023-06-011022Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its SolutionHongwei Wang0Harbin Institute of Technology, China, Harbin When discussing the issue of impunity, the ICL academia lacks attention to the concept of “impunity”. The understanding of the concept of impunity is limited to its damage to the value and function of criminal law, and ignores the ontological significance of the principle of equality to it. Therefore, it is impossible to explain the fundamental reason why the ICC cannot “end the history of impunity”. This paper examines the three dimensions of “impunity”. First of all, in the ontological dimension, this paper points out that impunity should be interpreted at “thick” and “thin” levels: “Thin impunity” focuses on the value and punishment function of ICL; “Thick impunity” means that the root cause of impunity is the failure to guarantee “equality before the law”. Secondly, from the perspective of epistemology, it is pointed out that the reason why the ICC can’t guarantee equality before the law lies in the “selectivity” of the court – “legal selectivity” and “political selectivity”. Finally, from the perspective of methodology, it is pointed out that the current situation of the international society in the horizontal/vertical dual structure and the structural defects of the Court decide that the ICC can’t end the impunity caused by the “absence of equality”, and advocates the introduction of the pioneering but little-known “International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG)” model, which provides an effective way to solve the problem of impunity. Key words: Impunity; Equality; ICC; Rule of Law; Selectivity; CICIG mode http://ir-law/index.php/1-mo/article/view/1386
spellingShingle Hongwei Wang
Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution
Halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦atynastar ža̋ne halyk̦aralyk̦ k̦u̇k̦yk̦ seriâsì
title Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution
title_full Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution
title_fullStr Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution
title_full_unstemmed Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution
title_short Research on the “Thin” and “Thick” of Impunity and Its Solution
title_sort research on the thin and thick of impunity and its solution
url http://ir-law/index.php/1-mo/article/view/1386
work_keys_str_mv AT hongweiwang researchonthethinandthickofimpunityanditssolution