Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire

Berit Taraldsen Valeberg,1 Linda Margareth Pedersen,2,3 Valentina Girotto,3,4 Vivi Lycke Christensen,5 Audun Stubhaug3,6 1Department of Nursing and Health promotion, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, 2Research and communication unit for musculoskeletal health (FORMI), 3Depart...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeberg BT, Pedersen LM, Girotto V, Christensen VL, Stubhaug A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/validation-of-the-norwegian-pain-sensitivity-questionnaire-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
_version_ 1818484095739494400
author Valeberg BT
Pedersen LM
Girotto V
Christensen VL
Stubhaug A
author_facet Valeberg BT
Pedersen LM
Girotto V
Christensen VL
Stubhaug A
author_sort Valeberg BT
collection DOAJ
description Berit Taraldsen Valeberg,1 Linda Margareth Pedersen,2,3 Valentina Girotto,3,4 Vivi Lycke Christensen,5 Audun Stubhaug3,6 1Department of Nursing and Health promotion, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, 2Research and communication unit for musculoskeletal health (FORMI), 3Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 4Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 5Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, 6Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Background and purpose: There is a large variation in people’s reactions to painful stimuli. Although some conditions are more painful, the variation between people is larger than the reaction to pain across conditions. Induced experimental pain is one way to assess some aspects of these differences in pain perception. Experimental nociceptive testing is time consuming and not always feasible in a clinical setting. In order to overcome the obstacles of assessing pain sensitivity using experimental stimulation, the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) was developed. The purpose of this study is to validate the Norwegian version of the PSQ. Methods: Construct validity was examined through an exploratory principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach’s alpha reliability for subscales and the total PSQ. As confounding variables such as age and gender may contribute to the experience of pain, a regression analysis was performed with demographic variables and PSQ scores as independent variables and the experimental measures of pain as the dependent variable. Results: The factor analysis yielded at two factor solution, with an eigenvalue greater than one, explain 58% of the variance. Cronbach’s alpha for the PSQ was 0.92. In the regression analysis, only PSQ scores contributed to explain the experimental pain intensity and tolerance. Gender only influenced the experimental pain threshold, as men had statistically significant higher heat pain threshold than women. Conclusion: This study shows that PSQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire and might be a promising instrument for assessing pain sensitivity in Norwegian clinical settings. Further studies are needed to examine whether the PSQ can be used in clinical settings to predict postoperative pain and the development of chronic pain. Keywords: experimental pain, pain sensitivity questionnaire, factor analysis, gender
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:50:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7730450c36d9444c8e65d5f194f5043e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7090
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:50:39Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-7730450c36d9444c8e65d5f194f5043e2022-12-22T01:42:48ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902017-05-01Volume 101137114232826Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity QuestionnaireValeberg BTPedersen LMGirotto VChristensen VLStubhaug ABerit Taraldsen Valeberg,1 Linda Margareth Pedersen,2,3 Valentina Girotto,3,4 Vivi Lycke Christensen,5 Audun Stubhaug3,6 1Department of Nursing and Health promotion, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, 2Research and communication unit for musculoskeletal health (FORMI), 3Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 4Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 5Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, 6Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Background and purpose: There is a large variation in people’s reactions to painful stimuli. Although some conditions are more painful, the variation between people is larger than the reaction to pain across conditions. Induced experimental pain is one way to assess some aspects of these differences in pain perception. Experimental nociceptive testing is time consuming and not always feasible in a clinical setting. In order to overcome the obstacles of assessing pain sensitivity using experimental stimulation, the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) was developed. The purpose of this study is to validate the Norwegian version of the PSQ. Methods: Construct validity was examined through an exploratory principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach’s alpha reliability for subscales and the total PSQ. As confounding variables such as age and gender may contribute to the experience of pain, a regression analysis was performed with demographic variables and PSQ scores as independent variables and the experimental measures of pain as the dependent variable. Results: The factor analysis yielded at two factor solution, with an eigenvalue greater than one, explain 58% of the variance. Cronbach’s alpha for the PSQ was 0.92. In the regression analysis, only PSQ scores contributed to explain the experimental pain intensity and tolerance. Gender only influenced the experimental pain threshold, as men had statistically significant higher heat pain threshold than women. Conclusion: This study shows that PSQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire and might be a promising instrument for assessing pain sensitivity in Norwegian clinical settings. Further studies are needed to examine whether the PSQ can be used in clinical settings to predict postoperative pain and the development of chronic pain. Keywords: experimental pain, pain sensitivity questionnaire, factor analysis, genderhttps://www.dovepress.com/validation-of-the-norwegian-pain-sensitivity-questionnaire-peer-reviewed-article-JPRExperimental painPain Sensitivity Questionnairefactor analysisgender
spellingShingle Valeberg BT
Pedersen LM
Girotto V
Christensen VL
Stubhaug A
Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
Journal of Pain Research
Experimental pain
Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
factor analysis
gender
title Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
title_full Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
title_fullStr Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
title_short Validation of the Norwegian Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
title_sort validation of the norwegian pain sensitivity questionnaire
topic Experimental pain
Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
factor analysis
gender
url https://www.dovepress.com/validation-of-the-norwegian-pain-sensitivity-questionnaire-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT valebergbt validationofthenorwegianpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT pedersenlm validationofthenorwegianpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT girottov validationofthenorwegianpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT christensenvl validationofthenorwegianpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT stubhauga validationofthenorwegianpainsensitivityquestionnaire