FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Background The role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in assessing response to immunotherapy in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is unknown. This study compared complete metabolic response (CMR) rates by FDG-PET and RECIST1.1 via CT or MRI in patients on cemiplimab for > 10 months....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luke S. McLean, Karda Cavanagh, Rodney J. Hicks, Jason Callahan, Jing Xie, Anthony Cardin, Annette M. Lim, Danny Rischin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-10-01
Series:Cancer Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00426-2
_version_ 1818884110278459392
author Luke S. McLean
Karda Cavanagh
Rodney J. Hicks
Jason Callahan
Jing Xie
Anthony Cardin
Annette M. Lim
Danny Rischin
author_facet Luke S. McLean
Karda Cavanagh
Rodney J. Hicks
Jason Callahan
Jing Xie
Anthony Cardin
Annette M. Lim
Danny Rischin
author_sort Luke S. McLean
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in assessing response to immunotherapy in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is unknown. This study compared complete metabolic response (CMR) rates by FDG-PET and RECIST1.1 via CT or MRI in patients on cemiplimab for > 10 months. Methods This was a single-centre retrospective study of 15 patients treated with cemiplimab for advanced CSCC who had CT/MRI and FDG-PET/CT at > 10 months to assess metabolic treatment response. The median age was 73 years (range 55–84) and 93% were male. RECIST1.1 and PERCIST1.0 tumor responses were evaluated by blinded readers. Results Seventy-three percent (11/15) (95%CI 44.9, 92.2%) achieved a CMR on PET. Of these 11, on RECIST1.1 there was one complete response, 9 partial responses and one stable disease. Conclusions In patients on cemiplimab for > 10 months, there was discordance between CR rates on FDG-PET versus RECIST1.1. FDG-PET/CT may have utility for clarifying depth of response in patients treated with immunotherapy for CSCC.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T15:44:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-775096a9e5be429ca0c1a19c0432e1b4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1470-7330
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T15:44:20Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cancer Imaging
spelling doaj.art-775096a9e5be429ca0c1a19c0432e1b42022-12-21T20:15:23ZengBMCCancer Imaging1470-73302021-10-012111610.1186/s40644-021-00426-2FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaLuke S. McLean0Karda Cavanagh1Rodney J. Hicks2Jason Callahan3Jing Xie4Anthony Cardin5Annette M. Lim6Danny Rischin7Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreBiostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreAbstract Background The role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in assessing response to immunotherapy in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is unknown. This study compared complete metabolic response (CMR) rates by FDG-PET and RECIST1.1 via CT or MRI in patients on cemiplimab for > 10 months. Methods This was a single-centre retrospective study of 15 patients treated with cemiplimab for advanced CSCC who had CT/MRI and FDG-PET/CT at > 10 months to assess metabolic treatment response. The median age was 73 years (range 55–84) and 93% were male. RECIST1.1 and PERCIST1.0 tumor responses were evaluated by blinded readers. Results Seventy-three percent (11/15) (95%CI 44.9, 92.2%) achieved a CMR on PET. Of these 11, on RECIST1.1 there was one complete response, 9 partial responses and one stable disease. Conclusions In patients on cemiplimab for > 10 months, there was discordance between CR rates on FDG-PET versus RECIST1.1. FDG-PET/CT may have utility for clarifying depth of response in patients treated with immunotherapy for CSCC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00426-2Cutaneous cancerImmunotherapyFDG-PETPERCIST1.0RECIST1.1
spellingShingle Luke S. McLean
Karda Cavanagh
Rodney J. Hicks
Jason Callahan
Jing Xie
Anthony Cardin
Annette M. Lim
Danny Rischin
FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Cancer Imaging
Cutaneous cancer
Immunotherapy
FDG-PET
PERCIST1.0
RECIST1.1
title FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_full FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_short FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort fdg pet ct imaging for evaluating durable responses to immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
topic Cutaneous cancer
Immunotherapy
FDG-PET
PERCIST1.0
RECIST1.1
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-021-00426-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lukesmclean fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kardacavanagh fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT rodneyjhicks fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT jasoncallahan fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT jingxie fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT anthonycardin fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT annettemlim fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT dannyrischin fdgpetctimagingforevaluatingdurableresponsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma