Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response

Abstract Glutamatergic dysfunction is associated with failure to respond to antipsychotic medication in individuals with schizophrenia. Our objective was to combine neurochemical and functional brain imaging methods to investigate glutamatergic dysfunction and reward processing in such individuals c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elias D. Mouchlianitis, Lucy D. Vanes, Derek K. Tracy, Anne-Kathrin Fett, Daniel Joyce, Sukhi S. Shergill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26702-0
_version_ 1797778909861773312
author Elias D. Mouchlianitis
Lucy D. Vanes
Derek K. Tracy
Anne-Kathrin Fett
Daniel Joyce
Sukhi S. Shergill
author_facet Elias D. Mouchlianitis
Lucy D. Vanes
Derek K. Tracy
Anne-Kathrin Fett
Daniel Joyce
Sukhi S. Shergill
author_sort Elias D. Mouchlianitis
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Glutamatergic dysfunction is associated with failure to respond to antipsychotic medication in individuals with schizophrenia. Our objective was to combine neurochemical and functional brain imaging methods to investigate glutamatergic dysfunction and reward processing in such individuals compared with those with treatment responsive schizophrenia, and healthy controls. 60 participants played a trust task, while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging: 21 classified as having treatment-resistant schizophrenia, 21 patients with treatment-responsive schizophrenia, and 18 healthy controls. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was also acquired to measure glutamate in the anterior cingulate cortex. Compared to controls, treatment responsive and treatment-resistant participants showed reduced investments during the trust task. For treatment-resistant individuals, glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex were associated with signal decreases in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex when compared to those treatment-responsive, and with bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left parietal association cortex when compared to controls. Treatment-responsive participants showed significant signal decreases in the anterior caudate compared to the other two groups. Our results provide evidence that glutamatergic differences differentiate treatment resistant and responsive schizophrenia. The differentiation of cortical and sub-cortical reward learning substrates has potential diagnostic value. Future novel interventions might therapeutically target neurotransmitters affecting the cortical substrates of the reward network.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:23:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-776f54c724f748f79727a39c8d72a0b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:23:20Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-776f54c724f748f79727a39c8d72a0b92023-07-16T11:17:16ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-06-0113111010.1038/s41598-022-26702-0Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-responseElias D. Mouchlianitis0Lucy D. Vanes1Derek K. Tracy2Anne-Kathrin Fett3Daniel Joyce4Sukhi S. Shergill5Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceAbstract Glutamatergic dysfunction is associated with failure to respond to antipsychotic medication in individuals with schizophrenia. Our objective was to combine neurochemical and functional brain imaging methods to investigate glutamatergic dysfunction and reward processing in such individuals compared with those with treatment responsive schizophrenia, and healthy controls. 60 participants played a trust task, while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging: 21 classified as having treatment-resistant schizophrenia, 21 patients with treatment-responsive schizophrenia, and 18 healthy controls. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was also acquired to measure glutamate in the anterior cingulate cortex. Compared to controls, treatment responsive and treatment-resistant participants showed reduced investments during the trust task. For treatment-resistant individuals, glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex were associated with signal decreases in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex when compared to those treatment-responsive, and with bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left parietal association cortex when compared to controls. Treatment-responsive participants showed significant signal decreases in the anterior caudate compared to the other two groups. Our results provide evidence that glutamatergic differences differentiate treatment resistant and responsive schizophrenia. The differentiation of cortical and sub-cortical reward learning substrates has potential diagnostic value. Future novel interventions might therapeutically target neurotransmitters affecting the cortical substrates of the reward network.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26702-0
spellingShingle Elias D. Mouchlianitis
Lucy D. Vanes
Derek K. Tracy
Anne-Kathrin Fett
Daniel Joyce
Sukhi S. Shergill
Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response
Scientific Reports
title Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response
title_full Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response
title_fullStr Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response
title_full_unstemmed Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response
title_short Neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment-response
title_sort neuroimaging glutamatergic mechanisms differentiating antipsychotic treatment response
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26702-0
work_keys_str_mv AT eliasdmouchlianitis neuroimagingglutamatergicmechanismsdifferentiatingantipsychotictreatmentresponse
AT lucydvanes neuroimagingglutamatergicmechanismsdifferentiatingantipsychotictreatmentresponse
AT derekktracy neuroimagingglutamatergicmechanismsdifferentiatingantipsychotictreatmentresponse
AT annekathrinfett neuroimagingglutamatergicmechanismsdifferentiatingantipsychotictreatmentresponse
AT danieljoyce neuroimagingglutamatergicmechanismsdifferentiatingantipsychotictreatmentresponse
AT sukhisshergill neuroimagingglutamatergicmechanismsdifferentiatingantipsychotictreatmentresponse