Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins
Background and Aims: The seal provided by a root canal filling may be compromised by post space preparation. The aim of this study was to compare coronal microleakage around cast posts and prefabricated pins.Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight extracted single-rooted, maxillary human teeth were prep...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dental Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/19798.pdf&manuscript_id=19798 |
_version_ | 1818116202930634752 |
---|---|
author | Vahid Yegane Yosef Khlil Sefat Mahdi Tabrizizadeh Mohamad Hosein Lotfi Kamrani |
author_facet | Vahid Yegane Yosef Khlil Sefat Mahdi Tabrizizadeh Mohamad Hosein Lotfi Kamrani |
author_sort | Vahid Yegane |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background and Aims: The seal provided by a root canal filling may be compromised by post space preparation. The aim of this study was to compare coronal microleakage around cast posts and prefabricated pins.Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight extracted single-rooted, maxillary human teeth were prepared with step back method and filled with gutta-percha and sealer. After removing 8 mm of coronal gutta-percha with peeso-reamer drills #2 in twenty canals, the teeth were divided into three groups: cast post & core, prefabricated pin, and gutta-percha (without any post or pin). After thermocycling, the samples were immersed in India ink for seven days. Finally, the specimens were cleared and the coronal microleakage of dye was then measured by the stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests.Results: According to the results, the mean dye penetration in cast posts, pins, and group without post or pin was 3.3 (0.39), 5.2 (0.47), and 7.2 (0.15) mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: Considering the importance of adequate filling of crown for prevention of microleakage, the method for coronal filling must be selected with caution. According to the results of this study, no significant difference between microleakage of cast posts and prefabricated pins was observed. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:18:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-776f8b9c6ddf4a4f96ce74be180899e9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1024-641X 2008-2444 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:18:46Z |
publishDate | 2012-09-01 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Dental Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-776f8b9c6ddf4a4f96ce74be180899e92022-12-22T01:21:11ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442012-09-01244232237Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal PinsVahid YeganeYosef Khlil SefatMahdi TabrizizadehMohamad Hosein Lotfi KamraniBackground and Aims: The seal provided by a root canal filling may be compromised by post space preparation. The aim of this study was to compare coronal microleakage around cast posts and prefabricated pins.Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight extracted single-rooted, maxillary human teeth were prepared with step back method and filled with gutta-percha and sealer. After removing 8 mm of coronal gutta-percha with peeso-reamer drills #2 in twenty canals, the teeth were divided into three groups: cast post & core, prefabricated pin, and gutta-percha (without any post or pin). After thermocycling, the samples were immersed in India ink for seven days. Finally, the specimens were cleared and the coronal microleakage of dye was then measured by the stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests.Results: According to the results, the mean dye penetration in cast posts, pins, and group without post or pin was 3.3 (0.39), 5.2 (0.47), and 7.2 (0.15) mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: Considering the importance of adequate filling of crown for prevention of microleakage, the method for coronal filling must be selected with caution. According to the results of this study, no significant difference between microleakage of cast posts and prefabricated pins was observed.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/19798.pdf&manuscript_id=19798LeakagePostPinRoot Canal |
spellingShingle | Vahid Yegane Yosef Khlil Sefat Mahdi Tabrizizadeh Mohamad Hosein Lotfi Kamrani Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins Journal of Dental Medicine Leakage Post Pin Root Canal |
title | Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins |
title_full | Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins |
title_short | Comparison of Microleakage of Cast Posts and Intracanal Pins |
title_sort | comparison of microleakage of cast posts and intracanal pins |
topic | Leakage Post Pin Root Canal |
url | http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/19798.pdf&manuscript_id=19798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vahidyegane comparisonofmicroleakageofcastpostsandintracanalpins AT yosefkhlilsefat comparisonofmicroleakageofcastpostsandintracanalpins AT mahditabrizizadeh comparisonofmicroleakageofcastpostsandintracanalpins AT mohamadhoseinlotfikamrani comparisonofmicroleakageofcastpostsandintracanalpins |