Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Importance: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the recent approval of several new agents, long-term disease control remains elusive for most patients. Administration of 27.12 MHz radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) by means of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blackstock Arthur W., Benson Al B., Kudo Masatoshi, Jimenez Hugo, Achari Preeya F., McGrath Callum, Kirchner Volker, Wagner Lynne I., O’Connell Nathaniel S., Walker Kathy, Pasche Valerie K., D’Agostino Ralph, Barbault Alexandre, Pasche Boris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:4 open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.4open-sciences.org/articles/fopen/full_html/2021/01/fopen210003/fopen210003.html
_version_ 1818920998241566720
author Blackstock Arthur W.
Benson Al B.
Kudo Masatoshi
Jimenez Hugo
Achari Preeya F.
McGrath Callum
Kirchner Volker
Wagner Lynne I.
O’Connell Nathaniel S.
Walker Kathy
Pasche Valerie K.
D’Agostino Ralph
Barbault Alexandre
Pasche Boris
author_facet Blackstock Arthur W.
Benson Al B.
Kudo Masatoshi
Jimenez Hugo
Achari Preeya F.
McGrath Callum
Kirchner Volker
Wagner Lynne I.
O’Connell Nathaniel S.
Walker Kathy
Pasche Valerie K.
D’Agostino Ralph
Barbault Alexandre
Pasche Boris
author_sort Blackstock Arthur W.
collection DOAJ
description Importance: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the recent approval of several new agents, long-term disease control remains elusive for most patients. Administration of 27.12 MHz radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) by means of a spoon-shaped antenna (TheraBionic P1 device) placed on the anterior part of the tongue results in systemic delivery of low and safe levels of RF EMF from head to toe. Objective: To report treatment outcomes and adverse events associated with treatment with the TheraBionic P1 device in comparison to suitable historical placebo and actively treated controls. Design: Pooled case series with comparison to historical controls. Participants: Patients with advanced HCC receiving this treatment, 18 real-world patients and 41 patients from a previously reported phase II study. Historical controls from previously conducted clinical trials. Interventions: Three hours daily treatment with the TheraBionic P1 device compared with standard of care as received by historical controls in the previously conducted trials. Main outcomes and measures: Overall survival (OS), time to progression, response rate, and adverse events in the combined pooled patients and in appropriate subgroups comparable to the historical control groups. Results: In the pooled treatment group, median OS of patients with Child-Pugh A disease (n = 32) was 10.36 (95% CI 5.42–14.07) months, 4.44 (95% CI 1.64–7.13) months for patients with Child-Pugh B disease (n = 25), and 1.99 (95% CI 0.76–3.22) months for patients with Child-Pugh C disease (n = 2). Median OS for Child-Pugh A patients was 2.62 (33.9%) months longer than the 7.74 months OS of comparable historical controls (p = 0.036). The 4.73 (95% CI 1.18–8.28) months median OS for Child-Pugh B patients receiving TheraBionic P1 device as first line therapy is slightly higher than the 4.6 months median OS of historical controls receiving Sorafenib as first line therapy. Only grade 1 mucositis and fatigue were reported by patients using the device, even among Child-Pugh B and C patients. No patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment of advanced HCC with the TheraBionic P1 device is well tolerated, even in patients with severely impaired liver function, and results in improved overall survival compared to historical controls without any significant adverse events, even after many years of continuous treatment. This treatment modality appears to be well suited for patients who have failed or are intolerant to currently approved therapies.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:30:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7770903bdd2f4472a49fdde8880ba310
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2557-0250
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:30:39Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series 4 open
spelling doaj.art-7770903bdd2f4472a49fdde8880ba3102022-12-21T19:58:07ZengEDP Sciences4 open2557-02502021-01-014310.1051/fopen/2021003fopen210003Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinomaBlackstock Arthur W.Benson Al B.0Kudo Masatoshi1Jimenez HugoAchari Preeya F.McGrath CallumKirchner Volker2Wagner Lynne I.O’Connell Nathaniel S.Walker Kathy3Pasche Valerie K.4D’Agostino RalphBarbault Alexandre5Pasche BorisDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern Medical GroupDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of MedicineGenolier Cancer CenterWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer CenterTheraBionic Inc.TheraBionic GmbHImportance: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite the recent approval of several new agents, long-term disease control remains elusive for most patients. Administration of 27.12 MHz radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) by means of a spoon-shaped antenna (TheraBionic P1 device) placed on the anterior part of the tongue results in systemic delivery of low and safe levels of RF EMF from head to toe. Objective: To report treatment outcomes and adverse events associated with treatment with the TheraBionic P1 device in comparison to suitable historical placebo and actively treated controls. Design: Pooled case series with comparison to historical controls. Participants: Patients with advanced HCC receiving this treatment, 18 real-world patients and 41 patients from a previously reported phase II study. Historical controls from previously conducted clinical trials. Interventions: Three hours daily treatment with the TheraBionic P1 device compared with standard of care as received by historical controls in the previously conducted trials. Main outcomes and measures: Overall survival (OS), time to progression, response rate, and adverse events in the combined pooled patients and in appropriate subgroups comparable to the historical control groups. Results: In the pooled treatment group, median OS of patients with Child-Pugh A disease (n = 32) was 10.36 (95% CI 5.42–14.07) months, 4.44 (95% CI 1.64–7.13) months for patients with Child-Pugh B disease (n = 25), and 1.99 (95% CI 0.76–3.22) months for patients with Child-Pugh C disease (n = 2). Median OS for Child-Pugh A patients was 2.62 (33.9%) months longer than the 7.74 months OS of comparable historical controls (p = 0.036). The 4.73 (95% CI 1.18–8.28) months median OS for Child-Pugh B patients receiving TheraBionic P1 device as first line therapy is slightly higher than the 4.6 months median OS of historical controls receiving Sorafenib as first line therapy. Only grade 1 mucositis and fatigue were reported by patients using the device, even among Child-Pugh B and C patients. No patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment of advanced HCC with the TheraBionic P1 device is well tolerated, even in patients with severely impaired liver function, and results in improved overall survival compared to historical controls without any significant adverse events, even after many years of continuous treatment. This treatment modality appears to be well suited for patients who have failed or are intolerant to currently approved therapies.https://www.4open-sciences.org/articles/fopen/full_html/2021/01/fopen210003/fopen210003.htmltherabionichepatocellular carcinomaamplitude-modulatedradio frequencyelectromagnetic fieldssorafenibam rf emf
spellingShingle Blackstock Arthur W.
Benson Al B.
Kudo Masatoshi
Jimenez Hugo
Achari Preeya F.
McGrath Callum
Kirchner Volker
Wagner Lynne I.
O’Connell Nathaniel S.
Walker Kathy
Pasche Valerie K.
D’Agostino Ralph
Barbault Alexandre
Pasche Boris
Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
4 open
therabionic
hepatocellular carcinoma
amplitude-modulated
radio frequency
electromagnetic fields
sorafenib
am rf emf
title Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Safety and Efficacy of amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort safety and efficacy of amplitude modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
topic therabionic
hepatocellular carcinoma
amplitude-modulated
radio frequency
electromagnetic fields
sorafenib
am rf emf
url https://www.4open-sciences.org/articles/fopen/full_html/2021/01/fopen210003/fopen210003.html
work_keys_str_mv AT blackstockarthurw safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT bensonalb safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kudomasatoshi safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT jimenezhugo safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT acharipreeyaf safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT mcgrathcallum safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kirchnervolker safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wagnerlynnei safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT oconnellnathaniels safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT walkerkathy safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT paschevaleriek safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT dagostinoralph safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT barbaultalexandre safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT pascheboris safetyandefficacyofamplitudemodulatedradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsinadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma