Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself

In Deleuze’s Cinema 1: The Movement-Image and Cinema 2: The Time-Image, the cliché appears as merely one concern in a web of others, and here I would like to argue for its significance in distinguishing the nature of the two regimes of thought associated with the movement-image and the time-image. W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tyler Parks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2014-05-01
Series:Forum
Online Access:http://journals.ed.ac.uk/forum/article/view/1076
_version_ 1797979039846105088
author Tyler Parks
author_facet Tyler Parks
author_sort Tyler Parks
collection DOAJ
description In Deleuze’s Cinema 1: The Movement-Image and Cinema 2: The Time-Image, the cliché appears as merely one concern in a web of others, and here I would like to argue for its significance in distinguishing the nature of the two regimes of thought associated with the movement-image and the time-image. While Deleuze contends that artists and filmmakers must struggle with the cliché, it seems to me that he does not stress enough that filmmakers often make vital use of the clichés of continuity and spatio-temporal orientation that have been developed in the medium’s short history. It is in making use of these clichés, though not for the purpose of parody alone, that filmmakers are able to most forcefully make visible the limits that clichés set on cinematic thought, and the points at which thought moves outside these limits. In order to make my arguments I will consider the filmic style of Yasujiro Ozu, and Wong Kar-wai’s In the Mood for Love.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:32:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-777a3204e88c4dfa8e3b507b61c10dbb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-9771
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:32:35Z
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher University of Edinburgh
record_format Article
series Forum
spelling doaj.art-777a3204e88c4dfa8e3b507b61c10dbb2022-12-22T16:22:36ZengUniversity of EdinburghForum1749-97712014-05-011810.2218/forum.18.10761076Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside ItselfTyler Parks0University of EdinburghIn Deleuze’s Cinema 1: The Movement-Image and Cinema 2: The Time-Image, the cliché appears as merely one concern in a web of others, and here I would like to argue for its significance in distinguishing the nature of the two regimes of thought associated with the movement-image and the time-image. While Deleuze contends that artists and filmmakers must struggle with the cliché, it seems to me that he does not stress enough that filmmakers often make vital use of the clichés of continuity and spatio-temporal orientation that have been developed in the medium’s short history. It is in making use of these clichés, though not for the purpose of parody alone, that filmmakers are able to most forcefully make visible the limits that clichés set on cinematic thought, and the points at which thought moves outside these limits. In order to make my arguments I will consider the filmic style of Yasujiro Ozu, and Wong Kar-wai’s In the Mood for Love.http://journals.ed.ac.uk/forum/article/view/1076
spellingShingle Tyler Parks
Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself
Forum
title Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself
title_full Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself
title_fullStr Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself
title_full_unstemmed Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself
title_short Cinema, Cliché, and Thought Outside Itself
title_sort cinema cliche and thought outside itself
url http://journals.ed.ac.uk/forum/article/view/1076
work_keys_str_mv AT tylerparks cinemaclicheandthoughtoutsideitself