Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium

<span class="abs_content">Facing a crucial legitimacy crisis, many Western European political parties have recently undergone various forms of organizational changes by adopting procedures for increasing intra-democracy: internal ballots, internal referenda, primary elections and so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Sandri, Anissa Amjahad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Coordinamento SIBA 2015-03-01
Series:Partecipazione e Conflitto
Subjects:
Online Access:http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/14789
_version_ 1797680632673861632
author Giulia Sandri
Anissa Amjahad
author_facet Giulia Sandri
Anissa Amjahad
author_sort Giulia Sandri
collection DOAJ
description <span class="abs_content">Facing a crucial legitimacy crisis, many Western European political parties have recently undergone various forms of organizational changes by adopting procedures for increasing intra-democracy: internal ballots, internal referenda, primary elections and so on. Direct democracy is now used in a wide range of decision-making procedures such as candidate and leadership selection (Cross and Katz, 2013). These reforms have pro-vided new opportunities for participation to party members. What happens to more traditional elements of party internal structures when such instruments of intra-party democracy are adopted? And more specifically, how are such changes perceived by the party base? This paper explores the attitudes and behaviors of members with regard to intra-party democracy procedures. On the basis of a case study (Belgium) and of an original dataset, the paper explores the political consequences of intra-party democracy. We show that members’ satisfaction with the party and their degree of previous internal activism affect the level of involvement in intra-party democracy activities. However, the dissatisfaction of the party base vis-à-vis of the membership role is growing. Intra-party democratization seems to limit the organizational function of the grass-roots membership to a ‘cheerleading’ role.</span><br />
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:32:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-777c91daa5ba401c8420d17b4ca80d0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1972-7623
2035-6609
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:32:54Z
publishDate 2015-03-01
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
record_format Article
series Partecipazione e Conflitto
spelling doaj.art-777c91daa5ba401c8420d17b4ca80d0f2023-09-20T07:59:54ZengCoordinamento SIBAPartecipazione e Conflitto1972-76232035-66092015-03-018119021410.1285/i20356609v8i1p19014041Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of BelgiumGiulia Sandri0Anissa Amjahad1Université Catholique de LilleUniversité libre de Bruxelles<span class="abs_content">Facing a crucial legitimacy crisis, many Western European political parties have recently undergone various forms of organizational changes by adopting procedures for increasing intra-democracy: internal ballots, internal referenda, primary elections and so on. Direct democracy is now used in a wide range of decision-making procedures such as candidate and leadership selection (Cross and Katz, 2013). These reforms have pro-vided new opportunities for participation to party members. What happens to more traditional elements of party internal structures when such instruments of intra-party democracy are adopted? And more specifically, how are such changes perceived by the party base? This paper explores the attitudes and behaviors of members with regard to intra-party democracy procedures. On the basis of a case study (Belgium) and of an original dataset, the paper explores the political consequences of intra-party democracy. We show that members’ satisfaction with the party and their degree of previous internal activism affect the level of involvement in intra-party democracy activities. However, the dissatisfaction of the party base vis-à-vis of the membership role is growing. Intra-party democratization seems to limit the organizational function of the grass-roots membership to a ‘cheerleading’ role.</span><br />http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/14789intra-party democracyleadership selectionparty membershipparty politicsprimary elections
spellingShingle Giulia Sandri
Anissa Amjahad
Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
Partecipazione e Conflitto
intra-party democracy
leadership selection
party membership
party politics
primary elections
title Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
title_full Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
title_fullStr Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
title_short Party Membership and Intra-Party Democracy: How Do Members React to Organizational Change within Political Parties? The Case of Belgium
title_sort party membership and intra party democracy how do members react to organizational change within political parties the case of belgium
topic intra-party democracy
leadership selection
party membership
party politics
primary elections
url http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/14789
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliasandri partymembershipandintrapartydemocracyhowdomembersreacttoorganizationalchangewithinpoliticalpartiesthecaseofbelgium
AT anissaamjahad partymembershipandintrapartydemocracyhowdomembersreacttoorganizationalchangewithinpoliticalpartiesthecaseofbelgium