Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites

Abstract Objectives To fully assess the quality of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) and ascites and reveal the heterogeneity of recommendations and possible reasons among guidelines. Methods A systematic search was performed in the database to obtain guidelines...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia-Xi Li, Yan-Mei Shi, Li-Ya An, Jin-Xu Yang, Yu-Xing Qi, Ting Yang, Yun-Yun Cen, Yue-Ying Lin, Da-Li Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02097-y
_version_ 1831585719874748416
author Jia-Xi Li
Yan-Mei Shi
Li-Ya An
Jin-Xu Yang
Yu-Xing Qi
Ting Yang
Yun-Yun Cen
Yue-Ying Lin
Da-Li Sun
author_facet Jia-Xi Li
Yan-Mei Shi
Li-Ya An
Jin-Xu Yang
Yu-Xing Qi
Ting Yang
Yun-Yun Cen
Yue-Ying Lin
Da-Li Sun
author_sort Jia-Xi Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To fully assess the quality of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) and ascites and reveal the heterogeneity of recommendations and possible reasons among guidelines. Methods A systematic search was performed in the database to obtain guidelines for the management of MPE and ascites. The AGREE IIGtool was used to assess the quality of these guidelines. The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) was introduced to assess the scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for the management of MPE and ascites among guidelines, and evidence supporting these recommendations was extracted and analyzed. Results Nine guidelines were identified. Only 4 guidelines scored more than 60% and are worth recommending. Recommendations were also heterogeneous among guidelines for the management of MPE, and the main reasons were the different emphases of the recommendations for the treatment of MPE, the contradictions in recommendations, and the unreasonably cited evidence for MPE. Conclusions The quality of the management guidelines for patients with MPE and malignant ascites was highly variable. Specific improvement of the factors leading to the heterogeneity of recommendations will be a reasonable and effective way for developers to upgrade the recommendations in the guidelines for MPE.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:23:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-777e61b330b44da1910f0b8e3c583c97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:23:42Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-777e61b330b44da1910f0b8e3c583c972022-12-21T21:32:06ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192020-12-0118111010.1186/s12957-020-02097-yQuality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascitesJia-Xi Li0Yan-Mei Shi1Li-Ya An2Jin-Xu Yang3Yu-Xing Qi4Ting Yang5Yun-Yun Cen6Yue-Ying Lin7Da-Li Sun8Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical UniversityAbstract Objectives To fully assess the quality of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) and ascites and reveal the heterogeneity of recommendations and possible reasons among guidelines. Methods A systematic search was performed in the database to obtain guidelines for the management of MPE and ascites. The AGREE IIGtool was used to assess the quality of these guidelines. The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) was introduced to assess the scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for the management of MPE and ascites among guidelines, and evidence supporting these recommendations was extracted and analyzed. Results Nine guidelines were identified. Only 4 guidelines scored more than 60% and are worth recommending. Recommendations were also heterogeneous among guidelines for the management of MPE, and the main reasons were the different emphases of the recommendations for the treatment of MPE, the contradictions in recommendations, and the unreasonably cited evidence for MPE. Conclusions The quality of the management guidelines for patients with MPE and malignant ascites was highly variable. Specific improvement of the factors leading to the heterogeneity of recommendations will be a reasonable and effective way for developers to upgrade the recommendations in the guidelines for MPE.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02097-yMalignant pleural effusionMalignant ascitesGuideline appraisal
spellingShingle Jia-Xi Li
Yan-Mei Shi
Li-Ya An
Jin-Xu Yang
Yu-Xing Qi
Ting Yang
Yun-Yun Cen
Yue-Ying Lin
Da-Li Sun
Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Malignant pleural effusion
Malignant ascites
Guideline appraisal
title Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
title_full Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
title_fullStr Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
title_full_unstemmed Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
title_short Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
title_sort quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites
topic Malignant pleural effusion
Malignant ascites
Guideline appraisal
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02097-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaxili qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT yanmeishi qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT liyaan qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT jinxuyang qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT yuxingqi qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT tingyang qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT yunyuncen qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT yueyinglin qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites
AT dalisun qualityassessmentoftheguidelinesforthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusionsandascites