Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia

The current, utilitarian debate on the relation between euthanasia and happiness focusses primarily on the subject of dying patients. Where some utilitarians stress how euthanasia may relieve suffering in the process of dying, others emphasize the importance of respecting the autonomy of others to m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Donovan van der Haak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory 2021-09-01
Series:Conatus - Journal of Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/Conatus/article/view/24316
_version_ 1818475003072479232
author Donovan van der Haak
author_facet Donovan van der Haak
author_sort Donovan van der Haak
collection DOAJ
description The current, utilitarian debate on the relation between euthanasia and happiness focusses primarily on the subject of dying patients. Where some utilitarians stress how euthanasia may relieve suffering in the process of dying, others emphasize the importance of respecting the autonomy of others to make decisions like these themselves.  However, less attention has been paid to how legalizing euthanasia may impact the human decision-making processes of those still in a healthy and mentally sound state. This paper aims to shed light on this relatively underdeveloped subject within utilitarian theory. In particular, I focus on euthanasia’s most contested form: active, voluntary euthanasia. I draw on Ernst Becker,  who argues that moderate death anxiety stimulates people to work on ‘immortality projects,’ decisions that help them cope with the concept of death. Subsequently, I draw on several studies to defend the notion that immortality projects are indirectly conducive to happiness because they stimulate healthy decisions and long-term, human progress. Additionally, immortality projects counterbalance decisions that are based on an excessive drive for short-term pleasure. As euthanasia can make dying less painful, I argue it may diminish death anxiety to significant degree, and thereby also an incentive to work on immortality projects. This brings me to the conclusion that legalizing euthanasia is problematic from a utilitarian point of view, considering the observation that immortality projects are indirectly conducive to happiness.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T04:43:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-777fd70e6aa94187a586ea913db64f55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2653-9373
2459-3842
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T04:43:37Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory
record_format Article
series Conatus - Journal of Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-777fd70e6aa94187a586ea913db64f552022-12-22T02:11:31ZengThe NKUA Applied Philosophy Research LaboratoryConatus - Journal of Philosophy2653-93732459-38422021-09-016110.12681/cjp.24316Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of EuthanasiaDonovan van der Haak0Tilburg UniversityThe current, utilitarian debate on the relation between euthanasia and happiness focusses primarily on the subject of dying patients. Where some utilitarians stress how euthanasia may relieve suffering in the process of dying, others emphasize the importance of respecting the autonomy of others to make decisions like these themselves.  However, less attention has been paid to how legalizing euthanasia may impact the human decision-making processes of those still in a healthy and mentally sound state. This paper aims to shed light on this relatively underdeveloped subject within utilitarian theory. In particular, I focus on euthanasia’s most contested form: active, voluntary euthanasia. I draw on Ernst Becker,  who argues that moderate death anxiety stimulates people to work on ‘immortality projects,’ decisions that help them cope with the concept of death. Subsequently, I draw on several studies to defend the notion that immortality projects are indirectly conducive to happiness because they stimulate healthy decisions and long-term, human progress. Additionally, immortality projects counterbalance decisions that are based on an excessive drive for short-term pleasure. As euthanasia can make dying less painful, I argue it may diminish death anxiety to significant degree, and thereby also an incentive to work on immortality projects. This brings me to the conclusion that legalizing euthanasia is problematic from a utilitarian point of view, considering the observation that immortality projects are indirectly conducive to happiness.https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/Conatus/article/view/24316death anxietyeuthanasiaimmortality projectsThe Denial of Deathutilitarianism
spellingShingle Donovan van der Haak
Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia
Conatus - Journal of Philosophy
death anxiety
euthanasia
immortality projects
The Denial of Death
utilitarianism
title Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia
title_full Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia
title_fullStr Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia
title_full_unstemmed Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia
title_short Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia
title_sort death anxiety immortality projects and happiness a utilitarian argument against the legalization of euthanasia
topic death anxiety
euthanasia
immortality projects
The Denial of Death
utilitarianism
url https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/Conatus/article/view/24316
work_keys_str_mv AT donovanvanderhaak deathanxietyimmortalityprojectsandhappinessautilitarianargumentagainstthelegalizationofeuthanasia