When outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at term
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>When the primary and secondary outcomes of clinical studies yield ambiguous or conflicting recommendations, preference or valuation studies may help to overcome the decision problem. The present preference study is attached to two cl...
Main Authors: | Mol Ben WJ, Birnie Erwin, Bijlenga Denise, Bonsel Gouke J |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2007-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/7/10 |
Similar Items
-
Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial
by: Mol Ben WJ, et al.
Published: (2007-07-01) -
Contribution of Primary Pelvic Organ Prolapse to Micturition and Defecation Symptoms
by: Annette G. Groenendijk, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
The discriminative power of the ReproQ: a client experience questionnaire in maternity care
by: Marisja Scheerhagen, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Measuring clients’ experiences with antenatal care before or after childbirth: it matters
by: Marisja Scheerhagen, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial
by: Aafke Bruinsma, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)