A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane

Purpose. To compare the efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal and intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in pseudophakic patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) due to epiretinal membrane (ERM). Study Design. This study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Participants. Twe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Abdelshafy Tabl, Tarek Tawfik Soliman, Mohamed Anany Elsayed, Marwa Abdelshafy Tabl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7947710
_version_ 1827000612983668736
author Ahmed Abdelshafy Tabl
Tarek Tawfik Soliman
Mohamed Anany Elsayed
Marwa Abdelshafy Tabl
author_facet Ahmed Abdelshafy Tabl
Tarek Tawfik Soliman
Mohamed Anany Elsayed
Marwa Abdelshafy Tabl
author_sort Ahmed Abdelshafy Tabl
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal and intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in pseudophakic patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) due to epiretinal membrane (ERM). Study Design. This study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Participants. Twenty-three nonvitrectomized pseudophakic eyes of 23 subjects (9 M and 14 F with mean age: 54.8 years) with refractory DME due to ERM. Methods. The eyes were randomized to suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg/0.1 ml (SCTA) (n = 13 eyes) or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide 4 mg/0.1 ml (IVTA) (n = 10 eyes) and were evaluated at baseline and 1 and 3 months after injection to assess outcome measures. Main Outcome Measures. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (primary outcome), central foveal thickness (CFT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement (secondary). Results. Baseline median BCVA (logMAR) was 1.0 (range 0.8–1.0) in both groups, improved within the SCTA group to 0.8 on the 1st and 3rd months, while in the IVTA group, median BCVA changed to 0.8 and 0.9 on the 1st and 3rd months, respectively. No significant differences were noted between groups regarding BCVA at baseline (P=0.927), and 1st (P=0.605) and 3rd months (P=0.313). Regarding mean CFT, no significant differences were observed at baseline (P=0.353) and at the first month (P=0.214) between both groups, while at the third month, CFT was significantly higher in the IVTA group (385 um) than in the SCTA group (323 um) (P=0.028). Mean IOP was significantly higher in the IVTA group (15 mmHg) on 1st month than in the SCTA group (12 mmHg) (P=0.011); after 3rd month, IOP was significantly higher within the IVTA group (18 mmHg) than SCTA (14 mmHg) (P=0.028). No significant difference was noted between both groups at baseline IOP (P=0.435). Conclusions. Both SCTA and IVTA are effective in reduction of CFT and improvement of patients’ visual acuity, but with a higher recurrence rate and rise in IOP after IVTA when compared to SCTA. Both treatments have temporary effects with the possibility of recurrence of DME and the need for retreatment.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T18:08:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-77a20472311346a2a36549d53c0d3cf9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-0058
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:46:55Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-77a20472311346a2a36549d53c0d3cf92024-11-02T05:27:16ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7947710A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal MembraneAhmed Abdelshafy Tabl0Tarek Tawfik Soliman1Mohamed Anany Elsayed2Marwa Abdelshafy Tabl3Department of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyPurpose. To compare the efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal and intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in pseudophakic patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) due to epiretinal membrane (ERM). Study Design. This study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Participants. Twenty-three nonvitrectomized pseudophakic eyes of 23 subjects (9 M and 14 F with mean age: 54.8 years) with refractory DME due to ERM. Methods. The eyes were randomized to suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg/0.1 ml (SCTA) (n = 13 eyes) or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide 4 mg/0.1 ml (IVTA) (n = 10 eyes) and were evaluated at baseline and 1 and 3 months after injection to assess outcome measures. Main Outcome Measures. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (primary outcome), central foveal thickness (CFT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement (secondary). Results. Baseline median BCVA (logMAR) was 1.0 (range 0.8–1.0) in both groups, improved within the SCTA group to 0.8 on the 1st and 3rd months, while in the IVTA group, median BCVA changed to 0.8 and 0.9 on the 1st and 3rd months, respectively. No significant differences were noted between groups regarding BCVA at baseline (P=0.927), and 1st (P=0.605) and 3rd months (P=0.313). Regarding mean CFT, no significant differences were observed at baseline (P=0.353) and at the first month (P=0.214) between both groups, while at the third month, CFT was significantly higher in the IVTA group (385 um) than in the SCTA group (323 um) (P=0.028). Mean IOP was significantly higher in the IVTA group (15 mmHg) on 1st month than in the SCTA group (12 mmHg) (P=0.011); after 3rd month, IOP was significantly higher within the IVTA group (18 mmHg) than SCTA (14 mmHg) (P=0.028). No significant difference was noted between both groups at baseline IOP (P=0.435). Conclusions. Both SCTA and IVTA are effective in reduction of CFT and improvement of patients’ visual acuity, but with a higher recurrence rate and rise in IOP after IVTA when compared to SCTA. Both treatments have temporary effects with the possibility of recurrence of DME and the need for retreatment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7947710
spellingShingle Ahmed Abdelshafy Tabl
Tarek Tawfik Soliman
Mohamed Anany Elsayed
Marwa Abdelshafy Tabl
A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane
Journal of Ophthalmology
title A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane
title_full A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane
title_fullStr A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane
title_short A Randomized Trial Comparing Suprachoroidal and Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema due to Epiretinal Membrane
title_sort randomized trial comparing suprachoroidal and intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in refractory diabetic macular edema due to epiretinal membrane
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7947710
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedabdelshafytabl arandomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT tarektawfiksoliman arandomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT mohamedananyelsayed arandomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT marwaabdelshafytabl arandomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT ahmedabdelshafytabl randomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT tarektawfiksoliman randomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT mohamedananyelsayed randomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane
AT marwaabdelshafytabl randomizedtrialcomparingsuprachoroidalandintravitrealinjectionoftriamcinoloneacetonideinrefractorydiabeticmacularedemaduetoepiretinalmembrane