Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis

Abstract Background Increasing cycling for transport can contribute to improve public health among adults. Micro-environmental factors (i.e. small-scaled street-setting features) may play an important role in affecting the street’s appeal to cycle for transport. Understanding about the interplay bet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lieze Mertens, Jelle Van Cauwenberg, Ariane Ghekiere, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Benedicte Deforche, Nico Van de Weghe, Delfien Van Dyck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3471-5
_version_ 1819071895788584960
author Lieze Mertens
Jelle Van Cauwenberg
Ariane Ghekiere
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Benedicte Deforche
Nico Van de Weghe
Delfien Van Dyck
author_facet Lieze Mertens
Jelle Van Cauwenberg
Ariane Ghekiere
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Benedicte Deforche
Nico Van de Weghe
Delfien Van Dyck
author_sort Lieze Mertens
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Increasing cycling for transport can contribute to improve public health among adults. Micro-environmental factors (i.e. small-scaled street-setting features) may play an important role in affecting the street’s appeal to cycle for transport. Understanding about the interplay between individuals and their physical environment is important to establish tailored environmental interventions. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine whether specific subgroups exist based on similarities in micro-environmental preferences to cycle for transport. Methods Responses of 1950 middle-aged adults (45–65 years) on a series of choice tasks depicting potential cycling routes with manipulated photographs yielded three subgroups with different micro-environmental preferences using latent class analysis. Results Although latent class analysis revealed three different subgroups in the middle-aged adult population based on their environmental preferences, results indicated that cycle path type (i.e. a good separated cycle path) is the most important environmental factor for all participants and certainly for individuals who did not cycle for transport. Furthermore, only negligible differences were found between the importances of the other micro-environmental factors (i.e. traffic density, evenness of the cycle path, maintenance, vegetation and speed limits) regarding the two at risk subgroups and that providing a speed bump obviously has the least impact on the street’s appeal to cycle for transport. Conclusions Results from the current study indicate that only negligible differences were found between the three subgroups. Therefore, it might be suggested that tailored environmental interventions are not required in this research context.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T17:29:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-77ad8d8b57fa47a18b516c344d84c5a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T17:29:06Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-77ad8d8b57fa47a18b516c344d84c5a82022-12-21T18:55:58ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582016-08-0116111010.1186/s12889-016-3471-5Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysisLieze Mertens0Jelle Van Cauwenberg1Ariane Ghekiere2Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij3Benedicte Deforche4Nico Van de Weghe5Delfien Van Dyck6Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent UniversityDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent UniversityAbstract Background Increasing cycling for transport can contribute to improve public health among adults. Micro-environmental factors (i.e. small-scaled street-setting features) may play an important role in affecting the street’s appeal to cycle for transport. Understanding about the interplay between individuals and their physical environment is important to establish tailored environmental interventions. Therefore, the current study aimed to examine whether specific subgroups exist based on similarities in micro-environmental preferences to cycle for transport. Methods Responses of 1950 middle-aged adults (45–65 years) on a series of choice tasks depicting potential cycling routes with manipulated photographs yielded three subgroups with different micro-environmental preferences using latent class analysis. Results Although latent class analysis revealed three different subgroups in the middle-aged adult population based on their environmental preferences, results indicated that cycle path type (i.e. a good separated cycle path) is the most important environmental factor for all participants and certainly for individuals who did not cycle for transport. Furthermore, only negligible differences were found between the importances of the other micro-environmental factors (i.e. traffic density, evenness of the cycle path, maintenance, vegetation and speed limits) regarding the two at risk subgroups and that providing a speed bump obviously has the least impact on the street’s appeal to cycle for transport. Conclusions Results from the current study indicate that only negligible differences were found between the three subgroups. Therefore, it might be suggested that tailored environmental interventions are not required in this research context.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3471-5Built environmentBikingAdulthoodSubgroupPhotographsTransport
spellingShingle Lieze Mertens
Jelle Van Cauwenberg
Ariane Ghekiere
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Benedicte Deforche
Nico Van de Weghe
Delfien Van Dyck
Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis
BMC Public Health
Built environment
Biking
Adulthood
Subgroup
Photographs
Transport
title Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis
title_full Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis
title_fullStr Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis
title_short Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis
title_sort differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults a latent class analysis
topic Built environment
Biking
Adulthood
Subgroup
Photographs
Transport
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-016-3471-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liezemertens differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis
AT jellevancauwenberg differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis
AT arianeghekiere differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis
AT ilsedebourdeaudhuij differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis
AT benedictedeforche differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis
AT nicovandeweghe differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis
AT delfienvandyck differencesinenvironmentalpreferencestowardscyclingfortransportamongadultsalatentclassanalysis