Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types

Biomimetic replication of the structural anisotropy of musculoskeletal tissues is important to restore proper tissue mechanics and function. Physical cues from the local micro-environment, such as matrix fiber orientation, may influence the differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robin M. Delaine-Smith, Alice Jane Hann, Nicola H. Green, Gwendolen Clair Reilly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672959/full
_version_ 1819260116861452288
author Robin M. Delaine-Smith
Alice Jane Hann
Alice Jane Hann
Nicola H. Green
Nicola H. Green
Gwendolen Clair Reilly
Gwendolen Clair Reilly
author_facet Robin M. Delaine-Smith
Alice Jane Hann
Alice Jane Hann
Nicola H. Green
Nicola H. Green
Gwendolen Clair Reilly
Gwendolen Clair Reilly
author_sort Robin M. Delaine-Smith
collection DOAJ
description Biomimetic replication of the structural anisotropy of musculoskeletal tissues is important to restore proper tissue mechanics and function. Physical cues from the local micro-environment, such as matrix fiber orientation, may influence the differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization of osteogenic progenitor cells. This study investigates how scaffold fiber orientation affects the behavior of mature and progenitor osteogenic cells, the influence on secreted mineralized-collagenous matrix organization, and the resulting construct mechanical properties. Gelatin-coated electrospun poly(caprolactone) fibrous scaffolds were fabricated with either a low or a high degree of anisotropy and cultured with mature osteoblasts (MLO-A5s) or osteogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells (hES-MPs). For MLO-A5 cells, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was highest, and more calcium-containing matrix was deposited onto aligned scaffolds. In contrast, hES-MPs, osteogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells, exhibited higher ALP activity, collagen, and calcium deposition on randomly orientated fibers compared with aligned counterparts. Deposited matrix was isotropic on random fibrous scaffolds, whereas a greater degree of anisotropy was observed in aligned fibrous constructs, as confirmed by second harmonic generation (SHG) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. This resulted in anisotropic mechanical properties on aligned constructs. This study indicates that mineralized-matrix deposition by osteoblasts can be controlled by scaffold alignment but that the early stages of osteogenesis may not benefit from culture on orientated scaffolds.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T19:20:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-77bd3b4fe6df48cd8fc4ddb1fbed0e36
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-4185
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T19:20:48Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-77bd3b4fe6df48cd8fc4ddb1fbed0e362022-12-21T17:34:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852021-10-01910.3389/fbioe.2021.672959672959Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell TypesRobin M. Delaine-Smith0Alice Jane Hann1Alice Jane Hann2Nicola H. Green3Nicola H. Green4Gwendolen Clair Reilly5Gwendolen Clair Reilly6Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United KingdomBiomimetic replication of the structural anisotropy of musculoskeletal tissues is important to restore proper tissue mechanics and function. Physical cues from the local micro-environment, such as matrix fiber orientation, may influence the differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization of osteogenic progenitor cells. This study investigates how scaffold fiber orientation affects the behavior of mature and progenitor osteogenic cells, the influence on secreted mineralized-collagenous matrix organization, and the resulting construct mechanical properties. Gelatin-coated electrospun poly(caprolactone) fibrous scaffolds were fabricated with either a low or a high degree of anisotropy and cultured with mature osteoblasts (MLO-A5s) or osteogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells (hES-MPs). For MLO-A5 cells, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was highest, and more calcium-containing matrix was deposited onto aligned scaffolds. In contrast, hES-MPs, osteogenic mesenchymal progenitor cells, exhibited higher ALP activity, collagen, and calcium deposition on randomly orientated fibers compared with aligned counterparts. Deposited matrix was isotropic on random fibrous scaffolds, whereas a greater degree of anisotropy was observed in aligned fibrous constructs, as confirmed by second harmonic generation (SHG) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. This resulted in anisotropic mechanical properties on aligned constructs. This study indicates that mineralized-matrix deposition by osteoblasts can be controlled by scaffold alignment but that the early stages of osteogenesis may not benefit from culture on orientated scaffolds.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672959/fullboneextra cellular matirxmesenchymal stem cellsprimary ciliacollagenpolycaprolactone
spellingShingle Robin M. Delaine-Smith
Alice Jane Hann
Alice Jane Hann
Nicola H. Green
Nicola H. Green
Gwendolen Clair Reilly
Gwendolen Clair Reilly
Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
bone
extra cellular matirx
mesenchymal stem cells
primary cilia
collagen
polycaprolactone
title Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types
title_full Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types
title_fullStr Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types
title_full_unstemmed Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types
title_short Electrospun Fiber Alignment Guides Osteogenesis and Matrix Organization Differentially in Two Different Osteogenic Cell Types
title_sort electrospun fiber alignment guides osteogenesis and matrix organization differentially in two different osteogenic cell types
topic bone
extra cellular matirx
mesenchymal stem cells
primary cilia
collagen
polycaprolactone
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672959/full
work_keys_str_mv AT robinmdelainesmith electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes
AT alicejanehann electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes
AT alicejanehann electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes
AT nicolahgreen electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes
AT nicolahgreen electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes
AT gwendolenclairreilly electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes
AT gwendolenclairreilly electrospunfiberalignmentguidesosteogenesisandmatrixorganizationdifferentiallyintwodifferentosteogeniccelltypes