Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?

Participation is often presented as the solution for achieving social acceptance in energy infrastructure projects. Despite its broad recognition, participation might have very different meanings depending on the perspective taken. In this paper, we empirically explore different understandings of tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franziska Ruef, Michael Stauffacher, Olivier Ejderyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472031221X
_version_ 1818408491478417408
author Franziska Ruef
Michael Stauffacher
Olivier Ejderyan
author_facet Franziska Ruef
Michael Stauffacher
Olivier Ejderyan
author_sort Franziska Ruef
collection DOAJ
description Participation is often presented as the solution for achieving social acceptance in energy infrastructure projects. Despite its broad recognition, participation might have very different meanings depending on the perspective taken. In this paper, we empirically explore different understandings of two central perspectives in a participatory process: those of the project managers and the residents. While project managers have a rather classic view of participatory formats, residents look for formats they can accommodate in their everyday practices. Put together, both perspectives expand common conceptualizations of participation in the literature and enable the detection of blind spots. Based on empirical data from geothermal energy, our findings show that perceptions and expectations of participation vary and, in some cases, diverge, which leads to misunderstandings about the nature and scope of participation. This, in turn, can delay or even block energy projects.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:44:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-77be243dcadc4bb5ab98bb33697b9cff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4847
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:44:35Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Reports
spelling doaj.art-77be243dcadc4bb5ab98bb33697b9cff2022-12-21T23:07:42ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472020-11-01619501962Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?Franziska Ruef0Michael Stauffacher1Olivier Ejderyan2Corresponding author at: Transdisciplinarity Lab, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.; Transdisciplinarity Lab, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research—Supply of Electricity (SCCER-SoE), ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, SwitzerlandTransdisciplinarity Lab, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research—Supply of Electricity (SCCER-SoE), ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, SwitzerlandTransdisciplinarity Lab, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätsstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research—Supply of Electricity (SCCER-SoE), ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, SwitzerlandParticipation is often presented as the solution for achieving social acceptance in energy infrastructure projects. Despite its broad recognition, participation might have very different meanings depending on the perspective taken. In this paper, we empirically explore different understandings of two central perspectives in a participatory process: those of the project managers and the residents. While project managers have a rather classic view of participatory formats, residents look for formats they can accommodate in their everyday practices. Put together, both perspectives expand common conceptualizations of participation in the literature and enable the detection of blind spots. Based on empirical data from geothermal energy, our findings show that perceptions and expectations of participation vary and, in some cases, diverge, which leads to misunderstandings about the nature and scope of participation. This, in turn, can delay or even block energy projects.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472031221XParticipationGeothermal energySitingParticipant observationFocus groups
spellingShingle Franziska Ruef
Michael Stauffacher
Olivier Ejderyan
Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?
Energy Reports
Participation
Geothermal energy
Siting
Participant observation
Focus groups
title Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?
title_full Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?
title_fullStr Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?
title_full_unstemmed Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?
title_short Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?
title_sort blind spots of participation how differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation
topic Participation
Geothermal energy
Siting
Participant observation
Focus groups
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472031221X
work_keys_str_mv AT franziskaruef blindspotsofparticipationhowdifferentlydogeothermalenergymanagersandresidentsunderstandparticipation
AT michaelstauffacher blindspotsofparticipationhowdifferentlydogeothermalenergymanagersandresidentsunderstandparticipation
AT olivierejderyan blindspotsofparticipationhowdifferentlydogeothermalenergymanagersandresidentsunderstandparticipation