Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs.
To attain native-like proficiency in second-language word usage, learners have to discover intricate semantic categories in the target language. We investigated the factors influencing the development of two aspects of second-language learners' semantic categories: the category center and categ...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296628&type=printable |
| _version_ | 1797349360389849088 |
|---|---|
| author | Noburo Saji Chunzi Hong Chong Wang |
| author_facet | Noburo Saji Chunzi Hong Chong Wang |
| author_sort | Noburo Saji |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | To attain native-like proficiency in second-language word usage, learners have to discover intricate semantic categories in the target language. We investigated the factors influencing the development of two aspects of second-language learners' semantic categories: the category center and category boundary of word meanings. In the experiment, second-language learners of Japanese, whose first language is Mandarin, were asked to produce the best verb for 28 videos depicting various cutting and breaking events. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare the verb patterns used by second-language learners with those of native speakers. The second-language learners' verb use pattern suggested their struggle in delineating the semantic ranges of breaking verbs in a native-like manner. Model analyses further revealed that different factors contribute to learning two different aspects of word meanings. The learning category center of word meaning depended on the similarity between the lexical domains in the first and second languages. On the contrary, the success of learning the semantic boundaries of verbs required a large input frequency and smaller semantic coverage, and smaller category ambiguity. The results suggest that constructing a semantic domain in the second language should be evaluated from at least two different aspects of semantic representation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T12:29:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-77d80629caff4b0991686732d7d84e20 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T12:29:19Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-77d80629caff4b0991686732d7d84e202024-01-22T05:31:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01191e029662810.1371/journal.pone.0296628Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs.Noburo SajiChunzi HongChong WangTo attain native-like proficiency in second-language word usage, learners have to discover intricate semantic categories in the target language. We investigated the factors influencing the development of two aspects of second-language learners' semantic categories: the category center and category boundary of word meanings. In the experiment, second-language learners of Japanese, whose first language is Mandarin, were asked to produce the best verb for 28 videos depicting various cutting and breaking events. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare the verb patterns used by second-language learners with those of native speakers. The second-language learners' verb use pattern suggested their struggle in delineating the semantic ranges of breaking verbs in a native-like manner. Model analyses further revealed that different factors contribute to learning two different aspects of word meanings. The learning category center of word meaning depended on the similarity between the lexical domains in the first and second languages. On the contrary, the success of learning the semantic boundaries of verbs required a large input frequency and smaller semantic coverage, and smaller category ambiguity. The results suggest that constructing a semantic domain in the second language should be evaluated from at least two different aspects of semantic representation.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296628&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Noburo Saji Chunzi Hong Chong Wang Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs. PLoS ONE |
| title | Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs. |
| title_full | Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs. |
| title_fullStr | Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs. |
| title_short | Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs. |
| title_sort | learning semantic categories of l2 verbs the case of cutting and breaking verbs |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296628&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT noburosaji learningsemanticcategoriesofl2verbsthecaseofcuttingandbreakingverbs AT chunzihong learningsemanticcategoriesofl2verbsthecaseofcuttingandbreakingverbs AT chongwang learningsemanticcategoriesofl2verbsthecaseofcuttingandbreakingverbs |