Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)

The immediate refrigeration of meat after slaughter is a key issue for the proper storage and aging of meat. The industry standard cold chain relies on low temperatures and ventilation to lower the internal carcass temperature to 0–4 °C within the first 48 h, i.e., within four times the so-called se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beniamino Cenci-Goga, Alberto Amicabile, Musafiri Karama, Saeed El-Ashram, Cristina Saraiva, Juan García-Díez, Simone Finotti, Viviana Genna, Giampaolo Moretti, Riccardo Murari, Riccardo Muliari, Sabrina Bonizzato, Erica Lugoboni, Sabina Cassini, Caterina Dal-Ben, Luca Grispoldi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1434
_version_ 1797533819897643008
author Beniamino Cenci-Goga
Alberto Amicabile
Musafiri Karama
Saeed El-Ashram
Cristina Saraiva
Juan García-Díez
Simone Finotti
Viviana Genna
Giampaolo Moretti
Riccardo Murari
Riccardo Muliari
Sabrina Bonizzato
Erica Lugoboni
Sabina Cassini
Caterina Dal-Ben
Luca Grispoldi
author_facet Beniamino Cenci-Goga
Alberto Amicabile
Musafiri Karama
Saeed El-Ashram
Cristina Saraiva
Juan García-Díez
Simone Finotti
Viviana Genna
Giampaolo Moretti
Riccardo Murari
Riccardo Muliari
Sabrina Bonizzato
Erica Lugoboni
Sabina Cassini
Caterina Dal-Ben
Luca Grispoldi
author_sort Beniamino Cenci-Goga
collection DOAJ
description The immediate refrigeration of meat after slaughter is a key issue for the proper storage and aging of meat. The industry standard cold chain relies on low temperatures and ventilation to lower the internal carcass temperature to 0–4 °C within the first 48 h, i.e., within four times the so-called semi-cooling time. On the other hand, for games, once bled and eviscerated, the carcass must be sent to a point where it can be sectioned or kept on air for maturation at refrigeration temperature. The precautions to observe are few and simple but essential: protect the meat and start the cooling process quickly. After preparing the animal (bleeding and evisceration), it may be necessary to face a period of transport that is sometimes long and not very easy; while small animals can be easily transported in a backpack, larger ones must necessarily be carried by several people or sometimes dragged to the vehicle capable of transporting them. It is obvious that a wild boar opened from the jaws to the pelvis and dragged for hundreds of meters will tend to be contaminated, although these contaminations are to be considered secondary for the preservation of the meat, compared to contamination by the intestinal contents. In an attempt to investigate the effect of delayed refrigeration on wild boar carcass contamination, the aim of this work was to determine a correlation between several hunting and logistic parameters (age, sex, animal weight, shooting distance, number of shots, weather and temperature and time from shot to refrigeration and to analysis) and bacterial contamination of the carcass. The correlation coefficient, r, was found to be 0.038 for the eviscerated body weight (<i>p</i> < 0.05), 0.091 for the external temperature on the day of hunting (<i>p</i> < 0.05), 0.027 for the time from shot to refrigeration (<i>p</i> = 0.081), 0.038 for the time from refrigeration to analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and 0.043 for the time from shot to analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These results stand for a negative correlation between the bacterial population and eviscerated carcass weight and between the bacterial population and external temperature and for a positive correlation between the time from shot to analysis and from refrigeration to analysis. No association was demonstrated between the bacterial population and the time from shot to refrigeration.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:21:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-77da24afd8ac4451b391395890ba621d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:21:04Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-77da24afd8ac4451b391395890ba621d2023-11-21T20:03:56ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-05-01115143410.3390/ani11051434Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)Beniamino Cenci-Goga0Alberto Amicabile1Musafiri Karama2Saeed El-Ashram3Cristina Saraiva4Juan García-Díez5Simone Finotti6Viviana Genna7Giampaolo Moretti8Riccardo Murari9Riccardo Muliari10Sabrina Bonizzato11Erica Lugoboni12Sabina Cassini13Caterina Dal-Ben14Luca Grispoldi15Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, 06126 Perugia, ItalyAzienda Ulss 9 Scaligera—Via Valverde, 42-37122 Verona, ItalyDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort 0110, South AfricaSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528231, ChinaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, PortugalVeterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, PortugalAzienda Ulss 9 Scaligera—Via Valverde, 42-37122 Verona, ItalyAzienda Ulss 9 Scaligera—Via Valverde, 42-37122 Verona, ItalyAzienda Ulss 9 Scaligera—Via Valverde, 42-37122 Verona, ItalyAzienda Ulss 9 Scaligera—Via Valverde, 42-37122 Verona, ItalyIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe)—Sezione di Verona—Via S. Giacomo, 5-37135 Verona, ItalyIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe)—Sezione di Verona—Via S. Giacomo, 5-37135 Verona, ItalyIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe)—Sezione di Verona—Via S. Giacomo, 5-37135 Verona, ItalyIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe)—Sezione di Verona—Via S. Giacomo, 5-37135 Verona, ItalyIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe)—Sezione di Verona—Via S. Giacomo, 5-37135 Verona, ItalyDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, 06126 Perugia, ItalyThe immediate refrigeration of meat after slaughter is a key issue for the proper storage and aging of meat. The industry standard cold chain relies on low temperatures and ventilation to lower the internal carcass temperature to 0–4 °C within the first 48 h, i.e., within four times the so-called semi-cooling time. On the other hand, for games, once bled and eviscerated, the carcass must be sent to a point where it can be sectioned or kept on air for maturation at refrigeration temperature. The precautions to observe are few and simple but essential: protect the meat and start the cooling process quickly. After preparing the animal (bleeding and evisceration), it may be necessary to face a period of transport that is sometimes long and not very easy; while small animals can be easily transported in a backpack, larger ones must necessarily be carried by several people or sometimes dragged to the vehicle capable of transporting them. It is obvious that a wild boar opened from the jaws to the pelvis and dragged for hundreds of meters will tend to be contaminated, although these contaminations are to be considered secondary for the preservation of the meat, compared to contamination by the intestinal contents. In an attempt to investigate the effect of delayed refrigeration on wild boar carcass contamination, the aim of this work was to determine a correlation between several hunting and logistic parameters (age, sex, animal weight, shooting distance, number of shots, weather and temperature and time from shot to refrigeration and to analysis) and bacterial contamination of the carcass. The correlation coefficient, r, was found to be 0.038 for the eviscerated body weight (<i>p</i> < 0.05), 0.091 for the external temperature on the day of hunting (<i>p</i> < 0.05), 0.027 for the time from shot to refrigeration (<i>p</i> = 0.081), 0.038 for the time from refrigeration to analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and 0.043 for the time from shot to analysis (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These results stand for a negative correlation between the bacterial population and eviscerated carcass weight and between the bacterial population and external temperature and for a positive correlation between the time from shot to analysis and from refrigeration to analysis. No association was demonstrated between the bacterial population and the time from shot to refrigeration.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1434wild boargamemeatmicrobiological qualityrefrigeration
spellingShingle Beniamino Cenci-Goga
Alberto Amicabile
Musafiri Karama
Saeed El-Ashram
Cristina Saraiva
Juan García-Díez
Simone Finotti
Viviana Genna
Giampaolo Moretti
Riccardo Murari
Riccardo Muliari
Sabrina Bonizzato
Erica Lugoboni
Sabina Cassini
Caterina Dal-Ben
Luca Grispoldi
Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)
Animals
wild boar
game
meat
microbiological quality
refrigeration
title Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)
title_full Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)
title_fullStr Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)
title_short Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>)
title_sort effect of delayed refrigeration on the microbial carcass contamination of wild boars i sus scrofa i
topic wild boar
game
meat
microbiological quality
refrigeration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1434
work_keys_str_mv AT beniaminocencigoga effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT albertoamicabile effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT musafirikarama effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT saeedelashram effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT cristinasaraiva effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT juangarciadiez effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT simonefinotti effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT vivianagenna effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT giampaolomoretti effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT riccardomurari effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT riccardomuliari effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT sabrinabonizzato effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT ericalugoboni effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT sabinacassini effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT caterinadalben effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai
AT lucagrispoldi effectofdelayedrefrigerationonthemicrobialcarcasscontaminationofwildboarsisusscrofai