Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study
Abstract To compare the efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and totally implantable venous-access ports (TIVAPs) for chemotherapy of pediatric patients with malignant tumors. A total of 96 children with malignant tumors who received catheterization of PICCs or TIVAPs for chem...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07584-8 |
| _version_ | 1818915577019760640 |
|---|---|
| author | Hong Zhang Yumei Li Nannan Zhu Yanfang Li Jinqiu Fu Jing Liu |
| author_facet | Hong Zhang Yumei Li Nannan Zhu Yanfang Li Jinqiu Fu Jing Liu |
| author_sort | Hong Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract To compare the efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and totally implantable venous-access ports (TIVAPs) for chemotherapy of pediatric patients with malignant tumors. A total of 96 children with malignant tumors who received catheterization of PICCs or TIVAPs for chemotherapy from May 2020 to May 2021 in Department of Pediatric Oncology of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were selected. Then, the pathological features of disease, the age of children, the indwelling time, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups. The age of children in the TIVAP group was younger than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The indwelling time in the TIVAP group was 7.2 ± 2.757 months,which was significantly longer than 5.65 ± 2.058 months in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the TIVAP group without systemic or local infection was markedly lower than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction degree of patients in the TIVAP group without unsatisfied was markedly higher than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). TIVAPs may be the first choice for chemotherapy of children with malignant tumors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T00:04:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-77e37745883a493eaf1b4201b84f3be8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T00:04:29Z |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-77e37745883a493eaf1b4201b84f3be82022-12-21T20:00:41ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-03-011211710.1038/s41598-022-07584-8Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center studyHong Zhang0Yumei Li1Nannan Zhu2Yanfang Li3Jinqiu Fu4Jing Liu5Department of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversitySchool of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong UniversityAbstract To compare the efficacy of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and totally implantable venous-access ports (TIVAPs) for chemotherapy of pediatric patients with malignant tumors. A total of 96 children with malignant tumors who received catheterization of PICCs or TIVAPs for chemotherapy from May 2020 to May 2021 in Department of Pediatric Oncology of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were selected. Then, the pathological features of disease, the age of children, the indwelling time, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups. The age of children in the TIVAP group was younger than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The indwelling time in the TIVAP group was 7.2 ± 2.757 months,which was significantly longer than 5.65 ± 2.058 months in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the TIVAP group without systemic or local infection was markedly lower than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). The satisfaction degree of patients in the TIVAP group without unsatisfied was markedly higher than that in the PICC group (P < 0.05). TIVAPs may be the first choice for chemotherapy of children with malignant tumors.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07584-8 |
| spellingShingle | Hong Zhang Yumei Li Nannan Zhu Yanfang Li Jinqiu Fu Jing Liu Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study Scientific Reports |
| title | Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study |
| title_full | Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study |
| title_short | Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) versus totally implantable venous-access ports in pediatric oncology patients, a single center study |
| title_sort | comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters piccs versus totally implantable venous access ports in pediatric oncology patients a single center study |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07584-8 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hongzhang comparisonofperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspiccsversustotallyimplantablevenousaccessportsinpediatriconcologypatientsasinglecenterstudy AT yumeili comparisonofperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspiccsversustotallyimplantablevenousaccessportsinpediatriconcologypatientsasinglecenterstudy AT nannanzhu comparisonofperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspiccsversustotallyimplantablevenousaccessportsinpediatriconcologypatientsasinglecenterstudy AT yanfangli comparisonofperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspiccsversustotallyimplantablevenousaccessportsinpediatriconcologypatientsasinglecenterstudy AT jinqiufu comparisonofperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspiccsversustotallyimplantablevenousaccessportsinpediatriconcologypatientsasinglecenterstudy AT jingliu comparisonofperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheterspiccsversustotallyimplantablevenousaccessportsinpediatriconcologypatientsasinglecenterstudy |