Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution

Context: The contamination of water sources by the discharge of effluents contaminated with chromium (VI) is a current environmental problem because it is a toxic pollutant for humans, animals, plants, and microorganisms; it can be carcinogenic and has a high solubility in an aqueous environment. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: candelaria nahir tejada tovar, Angel Villabona Ortíz, Rafael Contreras Amaya
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas 2021-04-01
Series:Tecnura
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/Tecnura/article/view/17088
_version_ 1818589207556259840
author candelaria nahir tejada tovar
Angel Villabona Ortíz
Rafael Contreras Amaya
author_facet candelaria nahir tejada tovar
Angel Villabona Ortíz
Rafael Contreras Amaya
author_sort candelaria nahir tejada tovar
collection DOAJ
description Context: The contamination of water sources by the discharge of effluents contaminated with chromium (VI) is a current environmental problem because it is a toxic pollutant for humans, animals, plants, and microorganisms; it can be carcinogenic and has a high solubility in an aqueous environment. This research aims to study the electrochemical removal of hexavalent chromium by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes with monopolar configuration, evaluating the effect of residence time, voltage, and the number of electrodes on the removal efficiency. Methodology: The experiments were conducted in a 3L batch electrocoagulation cell, using 10 and 6 aluminum and stainless steel plates as electrodes, connected at a distance of 1.5 cm in a monopolar configuration in parallel to the power source. Contaminated solution with Cr (VI) was treated at a concentration of 50 mg/L, evaluating two levels of residence time (20 and 30 min), voltage (20 and 30 V), and the number of electrodes (6 and 10 electrodes). Results: After the electrocoagulation removal tests, it was obtained removal percentages between 60.15 and 92.9%. The most significant positive variable in the process was the increase in the residence time. It can be inferred that electrocoagulation performs better at lower voltages and longer residence times and that the joint effect of the increase of the number of electrodes and the contact time would increase the performance of the process, achieving greater removal. Conclusions: The process of reduction of chromium (VI) by electrocoagulation has the potential to be used for the cost-effective removal of heavy metals from water
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:36:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-77f972101b8b48468c6f4f37d7e0460b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0123-921X
2248-7638
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:36:59Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas
record_format Article
series Tecnura
spelling doaj.art-77f972101b8b48468c6f4f37d7e0460b2022-12-21T22:36:23ZspaUniversidad Distrital Francisco Jose de CaldasTecnura0123-921X2248-76382021-04-012568284210.14483/22487638.1708812834Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solutioncandelaria nahir tejada tovar0Angel Villabona Ortíz1Rafael Contreras Amaya2Universidad de CartagenaUniversity cartagenaUniversity CartagenaContext: The contamination of water sources by the discharge of effluents contaminated with chromium (VI) is a current environmental problem because it is a toxic pollutant for humans, animals, plants, and microorganisms; it can be carcinogenic and has a high solubility in an aqueous environment. This research aims to study the electrochemical removal of hexavalent chromium by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes with monopolar configuration, evaluating the effect of residence time, voltage, and the number of electrodes on the removal efficiency. Methodology: The experiments were conducted in a 3L batch electrocoagulation cell, using 10 and 6 aluminum and stainless steel plates as electrodes, connected at a distance of 1.5 cm in a monopolar configuration in parallel to the power source. Contaminated solution with Cr (VI) was treated at a concentration of 50 mg/L, evaluating two levels of residence time (20 and 30 min), voltage (20 and 30 V), and the number of electrodes (6 and 10 electrodes). Results: After the electrocoagulation removal tests, it was obtained removal percentages between 60.15 and 92.9%. The most significant positive variable in the process was the increase in the residence time. It can be inferred that electrocoagulation performs better at lower voltages and longer residence times and that the joint effect of the increase of the number of electrodes and the contact time would increase the performance of the process, achieving greater removal. Conclusions: The process of reduction of chromium (VI) by electrocoagulation has the potential to be used for the cost-effective removal of heavy metals from waterhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/Tecnura/article/view/17088cr(vi)aluminum electrodesiron electrodes
spellingShingle candelaria nahir tejada tovar
Angel Villabona Ortíz
Rafael Contreras Amaya
Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution
Tecnura
cr(vi)
aluminum electrodes
iron electrodes
title Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution
title_full Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution
title_fullStr Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution
title_full_unstemmed Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution
title_short Electrocoagulation as an Alternative for the Removal of Chromium (VI) in Solution
title_sort electrocoagulation as an alternative for the removal of chromium vi in solution
topic cr(vi)
aluminum electrodes
iron electrodes
url https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/Tecnura/article/view/17088
work_keys_str_mv AT candelarianahirtejadatovar electrocoagulationasanalternativefortheremovalofchromiumviinsolution
AT angelvillabonaortiz electrocoagulationasanalternativefortheremovalofchromiumviinsolution
AT rafaelcontrerasamaya electrocoagulationasanalternativefortheremovalofchromiumviinsolution