Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film
Jean Rouch (1917–2004) is considered to be the greatest ethnographic filmmaker in the world. His films, which focus primarily on the Songhay of the Upper Niger in Africa, have fundamentally changed the spirit, goals, and methods of ethnographic filmmaking. I ask how Rouch established contact with th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Tartu Press
2013-11-01
|
| Series: | Sign Systems Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15650 |
| _version_ | 1818350311894417408 |
|---|---|
| author | Irene Portis-Winner |
| author_facet | Irene Portis-Winner |
| author_sort | Irene Portis-Winner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Jean Rouch (1917–2004) is considered to be the greatest ethnographic filmmaker in the world. His films, which focus primarily on the Songhay of the Upper Niger in Africa, have fundamentally changed the spirit, goals, and methods of ethnographic filmmaking. I ask how Rouch established contact with those he filmed, how his invented semio-ethnic terms and his understanding of twoness and the other informed his practice, and in what sense his films were “shared anthropology” (his term). |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:19:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-77fb0459834b4f5088db48e42ef928eb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1406-4243 1736-7409 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T18:19:50Z |
| publishDate | 2013-11-01 |
| publisher | University of Tartu Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sign Systems Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-77fb0459834b4f5088db48e42ef928eb2022-12-21T23:35:45ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092013-11-01412/310.12697/SSS.2013.41.2-3.06Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic filmIrene Portis-WinnerJean Rouch (1917–2004) is considered to be the greatest ethnographic filmmaker in the world. His films, which focus primarily on the Songhay of the Upper Niger in Africa, have fundamentally changed the spirit, goals, and methods of ethnographic filmmaking. I ask how Rouch established contact with those he filmed, how his invented semio-ethnic terms and his understanding of twoness and the other informed his practice, and in what sense his films were “shared anthropology” (his term).https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15650filmethno-timeethno-fictionethno-truthtwoness |
| spellingShingle | Irene Portis-Winner Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film Sign Systems Studies film ethno-time ethno-fiction ethno-truth twoness |
| title | Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film |
| title_full | Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film |
| title_fullStr | Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film |
| title_full_unstemmed | Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film |
| title_short | Jean Rouch: The semiotics of ethnographic film |
| title_sort | jean rouch the semiotics of ethnographic film |
| topic | film ethno-time ethno-fiction ethno-truth twoness |
| url | https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15650 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ireneportiswinner jeanrouchthesemioticsofethnographicfilm |