Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting

ObjectiveThis study provides a first approach to the use of the Multiple-Choice Procedure in social media networks use, as well as empirical evidence for the application of the Behavioral Perspective Model to digital consumption behavior in young users in conjunction with a methodology based on beha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oscar Robayo-Pinzon, Sandra Rojas-Berrío, Mario R. Paredes, Gordon R. Foxall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.960321/full
_version_ 1811167183105949696
author Oscar Robayo-Pinzon
Sandra Rojas-Berrío
Mario R. Paredes
Gordon R. Foxall
Gordon R. Foxall
author_facet Oscar Robayo-Pinzon
Sandra Rojas-Berrío
Mario R. Paredes
Gordon R. Foxall
Gordon R. Foxall
author_sort Oscar Robayo-Pinzon
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThis study provides a first approach to the use of the Multiple-Choice Procedure in social media networks use, as well as empirical evidence for the application of the Behavioral Perspective Model to digital consumption behavior in young users in conjunction with a methodology based on behavioral economics.Participants/methodsThe participants were part of a large university in Bogotá, Colombia, and they received an academic credit once they completed the online questionnaire. A total of 311 participants completed the experiment. Of the participants, 49% were men with a mean age of 20.6 years (SD = 3.10, Range = 15–30); 51% were women with a mean age of 20.2 years (SD = 2.84, Range = 15–29).ResultsAmong the total participants, 40% reported that they used social networks between 1 and 2 h a day, 38% between 2 and 3 h, 16% for 4 h or more, and the remaining 9% used them for 1 h or less per day. The factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) allowed us to identify a statistically significant effect of the delay of the alternative reinforcer, that is, the average crossover points were higher when the monetary reinforcer was delayed 1 week, compared to the immediate delivery of the monetary reinforcer. There was no statistically significant effect of the interaction between the magnitude of the reinforcer and the delay time of the alternative reinforcer.ConclusionsThis study supports the relative reinforcing value of an informational reinforcement consequence such as social media use, which is sensitive to both the magnitude of reinforcement and the delay in delivery as individual factors. The findings on reinforcer magnitude and delay effects are consistent with previous research that have applied behavioral economics to the study of non-substance-related addictions.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:04:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7808e6dfa28344939e1546e96a155f99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:04:52Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-7808e6dfa28344939e1546e96a155f992023-02-10T05:48:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652023-02-011110.3389/fpubh.2023.960321960321Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discountingOscar Robayo-Pinzon0Sandra Rojas-Berrío1Mario R. Paredes2Gordon R. Foxall3Gordon R. Foxall4School of Business Administration, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, ColombiaFaculty of Economics, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, ColombiaSchool of Business Administration, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, ColombiaCardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United KingdomSchool of Management, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, IcelandObjectiveThis study provides a first approach to the use of the Multiple-Choice Procedure in social media networks use, as well as empirical evidence for the application of the Behavioral Perspective Model to digital consumption behavior in young users in conjunction with a methodology based on behavioral economics.Participants/methodsThe participants were part of a large university in Bogotá, Colombia, and they received an academic credit once they completed the online questionnaire. A total of 311 participants completed the experiment. Of the participants, 49% were men with a mean age of 20.6 years (SD = 3.10, Range = 15–30); 51% were women with a mean age of 20.2 years (SD = 2.84, Range = 15–29).ResultsAmong the total participants, 40% reported that they used social networks between 1 and 2 h a day, 38% between 2 and 3 h, 16% for 4 h or more, and the remaining 9% used them for 1 h or less per day. The factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) allowed us to identify a statistically significant effect of the delay of the alternative reinforcer, that is, the average crossover points were higher when the monetary reinforcer was delayed 1 week, compared to the immediate delivery of the monetary reinforcer. There was no statistically significant effect of the interaction between the magnitude of the reinforcer and the delay time of the alternative reinforcer.ConclusionsThis study supports the relative reinforcing value of an informational reinforcement consequence such as social media use, which is sensitive to both the magnitude of reinforcement and the delay in delivery as individual factors. The findings on reinforcer magnitude and delay effects are consistent with previous research that have applied behavioral economics to the study of non-substance-related addictions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.960321/fullbehavioral economicstemporal discountingutilitarian reinforcementinformational reinforcementsocial media
spellingShingle Oscar Robayo-Pinzon
Sandra Rojas-Berrío
Mario R. Paredes
Gordon R. Foxall
Gordon R. Foxall
Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
Frontiers in Public Health
behavioral economics
temporal discounting
utilitarian reinforcement
informational reinforcement
social media
title Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
title_full Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
title_fullStr Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
title_full_unstemmed Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
title_short Social media sites users' choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
title_sort social media sites users choice between utilitarian and informational reinforcers assessed using temporal discounting
topic behavioral economics
temporal discounting
utilitarian reinforcement
informational reinforcement
social media
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.960321/full
work_keys_str_mv AT oscarrobayopinzon socialmediasitesuserschoicebetweenutilitarianandinformationalreinforcersassessedusingtemporaldiscounting
AT sandrarojasberrio socialmediasitesuserschoicebetweenutilitarianandinformationalreinforcersassessedusingtemporaldiscounting
AT mariorparedes socialmediasitesuserschoicebetweenutilitarianandinformationalreinforcersassessedusingtemporaldiscounting
AT gordonrfoxall socialmediasitesuserschoicebetweenutilitarianandinformationalreinforcersassessedusingtemporaldiscounting
AT gordonrfoxall socialmediasitesuserschoicebetweenutilitarianandinformationalreinforcersassessedusingtemporaldiscounting