Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection

Adaptation of saccades can be induced by different error signals, such as retinal position errors, prediction errors or reinforcement learning. Recently, we showed that a shift in the spatial goal of a perceptual task can induce saccadic adaptation, in the absence of a low-level position error. Here...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Christian Schütz, David eSouto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00566/full
_version_ 1828868765833494528
author Alexander Christian Schütz
David eSouto
David eSouto
author_facet Alexander Christian Schütz
David eSouto
David eSouto
author_sort Alexander Christian Schütz
collection DOAJ
description Adaptation of saccades can be induced by different error signals, such as retinal position errors, prediction errors or reinforcement learning. Recently, we showed that a shift in the spatial goal of a perceptual task can induce saccadic adaptation, in the absence of a low-level position error. Here we investigated whether this top-down effect is mediated by the visibility of the task-relevant object, by reinforcement due to the feedback about the perceptual judgment or by a target selection mechanism.Participants were asked to discriminate visual stimuli arranged in a vertical compound. To induce adaptation, the discrimination target was presented at eccentric locations in the compound. In the first experiment, we compared adaptation with an easy and difficult discrimination. In the second experiment, we compared adaptation when feedback about the perceptual task was valid and when feedback was provided but was unrelated to performance. In the third experiment we compared adaptation with instructions to fixate one of the elements in the compound—target selection—to the perceptual task condition—target selection and discrimination. To control for a bottom-up stimulus effect, we ran a fourth experiment in which the only instruction was to look at the compound. The saccade amplitude data were fitted by a two-state model distinguishing between an immediate and a gradual error correction process.We replicated our finding that a perceptual task can drive adaptation of saccades. Adaptation showed no effect of feedback reliability, nor an effect of the perceptual task beyond target selection. Adaptation was induced by a top-down signal since it was absent when there was no target selection instruction and no perceptual task. The immediate error correction was larger for the difficult than for the easy condition, suggesting that task difficulty affects mainly voluntary saccade targeting. In addition, the repetition of experiments one week later increased the magnitude of the gradual error correction. The results dissociate two distinct components of adaptation: an immediate and a gradual error correction. We conclude that perceptual-task induced adaptation is most likely due to top-down target selection within a larger object.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:37:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-781b89385f7a40c088c385cc03c6f77d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:37:07Z
publishDate 2015-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-781b89385f7a40c088c385cc03c6f77d2022-12-21T23:57:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612015-10-01910.3389/fnhum.2015.00566148408Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selectionAlexander Christian Schütz0David eSouto1David eSouto2Justus-Liebig-Universität GießenUniversity of LeicesterJustus-Liebig-Universität GießenAdaptation of saccades can be induced by different error signals, such as retinal position errors, prediction errors or reinforcement learning. Recently, we showed that a shift in the spatial goal of a perceptual task can induce saccadic adaptation, in the absence of a low-level position error. Here we investigated whether this top-down effect is mediated by the visibility of the task-relevant object, by reinforcement due to the feedback about the perceptual judgment or by a target selection mechanism.Participants were asked to discriminate visual stimuli arranged in a vertical compound. To induce adaptation, the discrimination target was presented at eccentric locations in the compound. In the first experiment, we compared adaptation with an easy and difficult discrimination. In the second experiment, we compared adaptation when feedback about the perceptual task was valid and when feedback was provided but was unrelated to performance. In the third experiment we compared adaptation with instructions to fixate one of the elements in the compound—target selection—to the perceptual task condition—target selection and discrimination. To control for a bottom-up stimulus effect, we ran a fourth experiment in which the only instruction was to look at the compound. The saccade amplitude data were fitted by a two-state model distinguishing between an immediate and a gradual error correction process.We replicated our finding that a perceptual task can drive adaptation of saccades. Adaptation showed no effect of feedback reliability, nor an effect of the perceptual task beyond target selection. Adaptation was induced by a top-down signal since it was absent when there was no target selection instruction and no perceptual task. The immediate error correction was larger for the difficult than for the easy condition, suggesting that task difficulty affects mainly voluntary saccade targeting. In addition, the repetition of experiments one week later increased the magnitude of the gradual error correction. The results dissociate two distinct components of adaptation: an immediate and a gradual error correction. We conclude that perceptual-task induced adaptation is most likely due to top-down target selection within a larger object.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00566/fullAttentionVisual Perceptionreinforcement learningtarget selectionsaccadic adaptation
spellingShingle Alexander Christian Schütz
David eSouto
David eSouto
Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Attention
Visual Perception
reinforcement learning
target selection
saccadic adaptation
title Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
title_full Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
title_fullStr Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
title_short Perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
title_sort perceptual task induces saccadic adaptation by target selection
topic Attention
Visual Perception
reinforcement learning
target selection
saccadic adaptation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00566/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderchristianschutz perceptualtaskinducessaccadicadaptationbytargetselection
AT davidesouto perceptualtaskinducessaccadicadaptationbytargetselection
AT davidesouto perceptualtaskinducessaccadicadaptationbytargetselection