Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years

Background and study aims The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical outcomes beyond 6 years in patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia. Patients and methods Patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between 2010 and 2012 and h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jad P. AbiMansour, Yervant Ichkhanian, Hitomi Minami, Pietro Familiari, Rosario Landi, Guido Costamagna, Stefan Seewald, Zachary M. Callahan, Michael B. Ujiki, Mathieu Pioche, Thierry Ponchon, Sabine Roman, Joo Young Cho, In Kyung Yoo, Megan Sippey, Jeffrey M. Marks, Nikolas Eleftheriadis, Vivek Khumbari, Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez, Mouen A. Khashab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-11-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1553-9846
_version_ 1818398400548175872
author Jad P. AbiMansour
Yervant Ichkhanian
Hitomi Minami
Pietro Familiari
Rosario Landi
Guido Costamagna
Stefan Seewald
Zachary M. Callahan
Michael B. Ujiki
Mathieu Pioche
Thierry Ponchon
Sabine Roman
Joo Young Cho
In Kyung Yoo
Megan Sippey
Jeffrey M. Marks
Nikolas Eleftheriadis
Vivek Khumbari
Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez
Mouen A. Khashab
author_facet Jad P. AbiMansour
Yervant Ichkhanian
Hitomi Minami
Pietro Familiari
Rosario Landi
Guido Costamagna
Stefan Seewald
Zachary M. Callahan
Michael B. Ujiki
Mathieu Pioche
Thierry Ponchon
Sabine Roman
Joo Young Cho
In Kyung Yoo
Megan Sippey
Jeffrey M. Marks
Nikolas Eleftheriadis
Vivek Khumbari
Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez
Mouen A. Khashab
author_sort Jad P. AbiMansour
collection DOAJ
description Background and study aims The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical outcomes beyond 6 years in patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia. Patients and methods Patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between 2010 and 2012 and had follow-up of at least 6 years were retrospectively identified at eight tertiary care centers. The primary outcome evaluated was clinical success defined by an Eckardt symptom score (ESS) ≤ 3 for the duration of the follow-up period. The clinical success cohort was compared to failure (ESS > 3 at any time during follow-up) in order to identify characteristics associated with symptom relapse. The incidence of patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was also evaluated. Results Seventy-three patients with 6-year follow-up data were identified. Sustained clinical remission was noted in 89 % (65/73) at 6-years. Mean ESS decreased from 7.1 ± 2.3 pre-procedure to 1.1 ± 1.1 at 6 years (P < 0.001). Symptomatic reflux was reported by 27 of 72 patients (37.5 %). Type I achalasia (OR 10.8, P = 0.04) was found to be associated with clinical failure on logistic regression analysis. Conclusions In patients with achalasia, POEM provides high initial clinical success with excellent long-term outcomes. There are high rates of patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux post-procedure which persist at long-term follow-up.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T07:04:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-781ec349b98d4b299f0cd58a68768405
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T07:04:11Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format Article
series Endoscopy International Open
spelling doaj.art-781ec349b98d4b299f0cd58a687684052022-12-21T23:12:18ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362021-11-010911E1595E160110.1055/a-1553-9846Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 yearsJad P. AbiMansour0Yervant Ichkhanian1Hitomi Minami2Pietro Familiari3Rosario Landi4Guido Costamagna5Stefan Seewald6Zachary M. Callahan7Michael B. Ujiki8Mathieu Pioche9Thierry Ponchon10Sabine Roman11Joo Young Cho12In Kyung Yoo13Megan Sippey14Jeffrey M. Marks15Nikolas Eleftheriadis16Vivek Khumbari17Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez18Mouen A. Khashab19Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USADepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Nagasaki University Hospital Nagasaki, JapanDigestive Endoscopy Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome, ItalyDigestive Endoscopy Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome, ItalyDigestive Endoscopy Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome, ItalyCenter of Gastroenterology Hirslanden Private Clinic Group Zürich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Surgery NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston, USADepartment of Surgery NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston, USAGastroenterology Unit/Unit of Functional Disease and Digestive Physiology Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, FranceGastroenterology Unit/Unit of Functional Disease and Digestive Physiology Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, FranceGastroenterology Unit/Unit of Functional Disease and Digestive Physiology Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, FranceDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cha Bundang Medical Center, Cha University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, KoreaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cha Bundang Medical Center, Cha University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, KoreaCase Western/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USACase Western/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USAMetropolitan Hospital, Athens, GreeceDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USABackground and study aims The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical outcomes beyond 6 years in patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia. Patients and methods Patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between 2010 and 2012 and had follow-up of at least 6 years were retrospectively identified at eight tertiary care centers. The primary outcome evaluated was clinical success defined by an Eckardt symptom score (ESS) ≤ 3 for the duration of the follow-up period. The clinical success cohort was compared to failure (ESS > 3 at any time during follow-up) in order to identify characteristics associated with symptom relapse. The incidence of patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was also evaluated. Results Seventy-three patients with 6-year follow-up data were identified. Sustained clinical remission was noted in 89 % (65/73) at 6-years. Mean ESS decreased from 7.1 ± 2.3 pre-procedure to 1.1 ± 1.1 at 6 years (P < 0.001). Symptomatic reflux was reported by 27 of 72 patients (37.5 %). Type I achalasia (OR 10.8, P = 0.04) was found to be associated with clinical failure on logistic regression analysis. Conclusions In patients with achalasia, POEM provides high initial clinical success with excellent long-term outcomes. There are high rates of patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux post-procedure which persist at long-term follow-up.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1553-9846
spellingShingle Jad P. AbiMansour
Yervant Ichkhanian
Hitomi Minami
Pietro Familiari
Rosario Landi
Guido Costamagna
Stefan Seewald
Zachary M. Callahan
Michael B. Ujiki
Mathieu Pioche
Thierry Ponchon
Sabine Roman
Joo Young Cho
In Kyung Yoo
Megan Sippey
Jeffrey M. Marks
Nikolas Eleftheriadis
Vivek Khumbari
Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez
Mouen A. Khashab
Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
Endoscopy International Open
title Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
title_full Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
title_fullStr Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
title_full_unstemmed Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
title_short Durability of per-oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
title_sort durability of per oral endoscopic myotomy beyond 6 years
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1553-9846
work_keys_str_mv AT jadpabimansour durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT yervantichkhanian durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT hitomiminami durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT pietrofamiliari durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT rosariolandi durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT guidocostamagna durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT stefanseewald durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT zacharymcallahan durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT michaelbujiki durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT mathieupioche durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT thierryponchon durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT sabineroman durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT jooyoungcho durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT inkyungyoo durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT megansippey durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT jeffreymmarks durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT nikolaseleftheriadis durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT vivekkhumbari durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT olayaibrewergutierrez durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years
AT mouenakhashab durabilityofperoralendoscopicmyotomybeyond6years