Precedence of natural law
Modern jusnaturalism claims that natural law consists of three sets of principles. First and most fundamentally, a set of principles directing human choice and action toward intelligible purposes, i.e. basic human goods such as life, knowledge, friendship and health. Second, a set of intermediate mo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Union University, Faculty of Law, Belgrade
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Pravni Zapisi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-2815/2016/2217-28151602213Z.pdf |
_version_ | 1818940664712265728 |
---|---|
author | Zdravković Miloš |
author_facet | Zdravković Miloš |
author_sort | Zdravković Miloš |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Modern jusnaturalism claims that natural law consists of three sets of principles. First and most fundamentally, a set of principles directing human choice and action toward intelligible purposes, i.e. basic human goods such as life, knowledge, friendship and health. Second, a set of intermediate moral principles directing choice and actions toward integral human fulfillment. Finally, third set of fully specific (moral) norms requires or forbids certain possible choices like forbidding killing an innocent person. Because the creating of law has a moral purpose, positive law norms have to be grounded in natural law. This old conception has own genesis from Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas to nowadays. Today, in modern natural law theory, this conception has purpose to establish criteria for deriving general norms of positive law from natural law principles. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T06:43:14Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-782f2623aa6c4903b551b729cb7718d3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2217-2815 2406-1387 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T06:43:14Z |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Union University, Faculty of Law, Belgrade |
record_format | Article |
series | Pravni Zapisi |
spelling | doaj.art-782f2623aa6c4903b551b729cb7718d32022-12-21T19:49:48ZengUnion University, Faculty of Law, BelgradePravni Zapisi2217-28152406-13872016-01-01722132292217-28151602213ZPrecedence of natural lawZdravković Miloš0Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u BeograduModern jusnaturalism claims that natural law consists of three sets of principles. First and most fundamentally, a set of principles directing human choice and action toward intelligible purposes, i.e. basic human goods such as life, knowledge, friendship and health. Second, a set of intermediate moral principles directing choice and actions toward integral human fulfillment. Finally, third set of fully specific (moral) norms requires or forbids certain possible choices like forbidding killing an innocent person. Because the creating of law has a moral purpose, positive law norms have to be grounded in natural law. This old conception has own genesis from Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas to nowadays. Today, in modern natural law theory, this conception has purpose to establish criteria for deriving general norms of positive law from natural law principles.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-2815/2016/2217-28151602213Z.pdfNatural law theorynatural law principlespositive lawAristotleThomas AquinasJohn FinnisRobert P. George |
spellingShingle | Zdravković Miloš Precedence of natural law Pravni Zapisi Natural law theory natural law principles positive law Aristotle Thomas Aquinas John Finnis Robert P. George |
title | Precedence of natural law |
title_full | Precedence of natural law |
title_fullStr | Precedence of natural law |
title_full_unstemmed | Precedence of natural law |
title_short | Precedence of natural law |
title_sort | precedence of natural law |
topic | Natural law theory natural law principles positive law Aristotle Thomas Aquinas John Finnis Robert P. George |
url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-2815/2016/2217-28151602213Z.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zdravkovicmilos precedenceofnaturallaw |