Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations

Summary: Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the methodological issues and comprehensiveness of workplace bullying instruments and to suggest a taxonomy of psychological abuse. Methods: Nineteen instruments applied in health care organizations and 469 questionnaire items mainly regarding psyc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eun-Jun Park, PhD, RN, Mikyoung Lee, PhD, RN, Myungsook Park, PhD, RN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-12-01
Series:Asian Nursing Research
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131717302943
_version_ 1828499631681568768
author Eun-Jun Park, PhD, RN
Mikyoung Lee, PhD, RN
Myungsook Park, PhD, RN
author_facet Eun-Jun Park, PhD, RN
Mikyoung Lee, PhD, RN
Myungsook Park, PhD, RN
author_sort Eun-Jun Park, PhD, RN
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the methodological issues and comprehensiveness of workplace bullying instruments and to suggest a taxonomy of psychological abuse. Methods: Nineteen instruments applied in health care organizations and 469 questionnaire items mainly regarding psychological abuse were collected through a literature review. Three researchers classified the questionnaire items according to a “taxonomy of psychological abuse in the workplace.” Results: Many instruments of workplace bullying were developed in the 2000s using a reflective measurement model, but their psychometric property was not sufficient and the measurement model is questioned. Based on the questionnaire items, the “taxonomy of psychological abuse in the workplace” was modified by adding two new subcategories (unachievable work and unfair treatment) and clarifying some operational definitions. According to the modified taxonomy of 11 (sub)categories, the reviewed instruments assessed 6.5 (sub)categories on average. No instrument measured all (sub)categories. Category 4.2 (disrespect, humiliation, and rejection of the person) was measured in all instruments, followed by Categories 5 (professional discredit and denigration) and 1.2 (social isolation) behaviors. Conclusion: The current instruments are not comprehensive enough. It is suggested that the modified taxonomy is verified and guide more reliable and inclusive instruments in the future. Furthermore, a formative measurement model, which defines a bullying as an inventory of different types of behaviors, should be used. Keywords: aggression, bullying, hostility, mobbing, surveys and questionnaires
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:27:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78350ec0771042418460964318c8d55c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1317
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:27:56Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asian Nursing Research
spelling doaj.art-78350ec0771042418460964318c8d55c2022-12-22T01:05:26ZengElsevierAsian Nursing Research1976-13172017-12-01114237245Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care OrganizationsEun-Jun Park, PhD, RN0Mikyoung Lee, PhD, RN1Myungsook Park, PhD, RN2Department of Nursing, Konkuk University, Chungju, Republic of KoreaCollege of Nursing, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, USADepartment of Nursing, Konkuk University, Chungju, Republic of Korea; Correspondence to: Myungsook Park, PhD, RN, Department of Nursing, Konkuk University, 268 Chungwon-daero, Chungju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do 27478, Republic of Korea.Summary: Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the methodological issues and comprehensiveness of workplace bullying instruments and to suggest a taxonomy of psychological abuse. Methods: Nineteen instruments applied in health care organizations and 469 questionnaire items mainly regarding psychological abuse were collected through a literature review. Three researchers classified the questionnaire items according to a “taxonomy of psychological abuse in the workplace.” Results: Many instruments of workplace bullying were developed in the 2000s using a reflective measurement model, but their psychometric property was not sufficient and the measurement model is questioned. Based on the questionnaire items, the “taxonomy of psychological abuse in the workplace” was modified by adding two new subcategories (unachievable work and unfair treatment) and clarifying some operational definitions. According to the modified taxonomy of 11 (sub)categories, the reviewed instruments assessed 6.5 (sub)categories on average. No instrument measured all (sub)categories. Category 4.2 (disrespect, humiliation, and rejection of the person) was measured in all instruments, followed by Categories 5 (professional discredit and denigration) and 1.2 (social isolation) behaviors. Conclusion: The current instruments are not comprehensive enough. It is suggested that the modified taxonomy is verified and guide more reliable and inclusive instruments in the future. Furthermore, a formative measurement model, which defines a bullying as an inventory of different types of behaviors, should be used. Keywords: aggression, bullying, hostility, mobbing, surveys and questionnaireshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131717302943
spellingShingle Eun-Jun Park, PhD, RN
Mikyoung Lee, PhD, RN
Myungsook Park, PhD, RN
Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations
Asian Nursing Research
title Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations
title_full Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations
title_fullStr Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations
title_short Instruments and Taxonomy of Workplace Bullying in Health Care Organizations
title_sort instruments and taxonomy of workplace bullying in health care organizations
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131717302943
work_keys_str_mv AT eunjunparkphdrn instrumentsandtaxonomyofworkplacebullyinginhealthcareorganizations
AT mikyoungleephdrn instrumentsandtaxonomyofworkplacebullyinginhealthcareorganizations
AT myungsookparkphdrn instrumentsandtaxonomyofworkplacebullyinginhealthcareorganizations