Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
Objectives Skills to employ nursing informatics to promote the health of individuals is of such importance that it is considered a core competence. Although investments are made to increase the use of e-health, there is no full understanding of the usability of e-health for healthcare. This paper pr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Korean Society of Medical Informatics
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Healthcare Informatics Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://e-hir.org/upload/pdf/hir-26-2-119.pdf |
_version_ | 1819003679828606976 |
---|---|
author | David Hallberg Narges Salimi |
author_facet | David Hallberg Narges Salimi |
author_sort | David Hallberg |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives Skills to employ nursing informatics to promote the health of individuals is of such importance that it is considered a core competence. Although investments are made to increase the use of e-health, there is no full understanding of the usability of e-health for healthcare. This paper presents a current picture of how e-health and m-health are defined and used as well as the effects their usage may have on the intended target group. Methods Peer-reviewed open-access papers and grey literature that define e-health and m-health from PubMed, SpringerLink, and Google.com were randomized. A mixed method design with an inductive approach was employed. Open-source software were used for analysis. Results The overview includes 30 definitions of e-health and m-health, respectively. The definitions were thematised into 14 narrative themes. The results of the study, and primarily a three-level model, provide an understanding of how different types of e-health and m-health can be put into practice, and the effects or consequences of using them, which may be either positive or negative. Conclusions Mobility and flexibility is important for both m-health and e-health. Five keywords that characterize the definitions of e-health and m-health are “health”, “mobile”, “use”, “information”, and “technology”. E-health or m-health cannot replace human actors because e-health and m-health consist of social and material interactions. Using e-health and m-health is, thus, about developing healthcare without compromising native relics. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T23:24:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-78375ccbe7c14a28a93b399137e77a34 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2093-3681 2093-369X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T23:24:50Z |
publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Medical Informatics |
record_format | Article |
series | Healthcare Informatics Research |
spelling | doaj.art-78375ccbe7c14a28a93b399137e77a342022-12-21T19:23:26ZengThe Korean Society of Medical InformaticsHealthcare Informatics Research2093-36812093-369X2020-04-0126211912810.4258/hir.2020.26.2.1191024Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-HealthDavid Hallberg0Narges Salimi1 Department of Communication, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon EitiCol Networks, Jönköping, SwedenObjectives Skills to employ nursing informatics to promote the health of individuals is of such importance that it is considered a core competence. Although investments are made to increase the use of e-health, there is no full understanding of the usability of e-health for healthcare. This paper presents a current picture of how e-health and m-health are defined and used as well as the effects their usage may have on the intended target group. Methods Peer-reviewed open-access papers and grey literature that define e-health and m-health from PubMed, SpringerLink, and Google.com were randomized. A mixed method design with an inductive approach was employed. Open-source software were used for analysis. Results The overview includes 30 definitions of e-health and m-health, respectively. The definitions were thematised into 14 narrative themes. The results of the study, and primarily a three-level model, provide an understanding of how different types of e-health and m-health can be put into practice, and the effects or consequences of using them, which may be either positive or negative. Conclusions Mobility and flexibility is important for both m-health and e-health. Five keywords that characterize the definitions of e-health and m-health are “health”, “mobile”, “use”, “information”, and “technology”. E-health or m-health cannot replace human actors because e-health and m-health consist of social and material interactions. Using e-health and m-health is, thus, about developing healthcare without compromising native relics.http://e-hir.org/upload/pdf/hir-26-2-119.pdfdata miningmeaningful usehealth information exchangehealth information systemsterminology as topic |
spellingShingle | David Hallberg Narges Salimi Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health Healthcare Informatics Research data mining meaningful use health information exchange health information systems terminology as topic |
title | Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health |
title_full | Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health |
title_fullStr | Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health |
title_short | Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health |
title_sort | qualitative and quantitative analysis of definitions of e health and m health |
topic | data mining meaningful use health information exchange health information systems terminology as topic |
url | http://e-hir.org/upload/pdf/hir-26-2-119.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidhallberg qualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofdefinitionsofehealthandmhealth AT nargessalimi qualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofdefinitionsofehealthandmhealth |