Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health

Objectives Skills to employ nursing informatics to promote the health of individuals is of such importance that it is considered a core competence. Although investments are made to increase the use of e-health, there is no full understanding of the usability of e-health for healthcare. This paper pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Hallberg, Narges Salimi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2020-04-01
Series:Healthcare Informatics Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-hir.org/upload/pdf/hir-26-2-119.pdf
_version_ 1819003679828606976
author David Hallberg
Narges Salimi
author_facet David Hallberg
Narges Salimi
author_sort David Hallberg
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Skills to employ nursing informatics to promote the health of individuals is of such importance that it is considered a core competence. Although investments are made to increase the use of e-health, there is no full understanding of the usability of e-health for healthcare. This paper presents a current picture of how e-health and m-health are defined and used as well as the effects their usage may have on the intended target group. Methods Peer-reviewed open-access papers and grey literature that define e-health and m-health from PubMed, SpringerLink, and Google.com were randomized. A mixed method design with an inductive approach was employed. Open-source software were used for analysis. Results The overview includes 30 definitions of e-health and m-health, respectively. The definitions were thematised into 14 narrative themes. The results of the study, and primarily a three-level model, provide an understanding of how different types of e-health and m-health can be put into practice, and the effects or consequences of using them, which may be either positive or negative. Conclusions Mobility and flexibility is important for both m-health and e-health. Five keywords that characterize the definitions of e-health and m-health are “health”, “mobile”, “use”, “information”, and “technology”. E-health or m-health cannot replace human actors because e-health and m-health consist of social and material interactions. Using e-health and m-health is, thus, about developing healthcare without compromising native relics.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:24:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78375ccbe7c14a28a93b399137e77a34
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2093-3681
2093-369X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:24:50Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher The Korean Society of Medical Informatics
record_format Article
series Healthcare Informatics Research
spelling doaj.art-78375ccbe7c14a28a93b399137e77a342022-12-21T19:23:26ZengThe Korean Society of Medical InformaticsHealthcare Informatics Research2093-36812093-369X2020-04-0126211912810.4258/hir.2020.26.2.1191024Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-HealthDavid Hallberg0Narges Salimi1 Department of Communication, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon EitiCol Networks, Jönköping, SwedenObjectives Skills to employ nursing informatics to promote the health of individuals is of such importance that it is considered a core competence. Although investments are made to increase the use of e-health, there is no full understanding of the usability of e-health for healthcare. This paper presents a current picture of how e-health and m-health are defined and used as well as the effects their usage may have on the intended target group. Methods Peer-reviewed open-access papers and grey literature that define e-health and m-health from PubMed, SpringerLink, and Google.com were randomized. A mixed method design with an inductive approach was employed. Open-source software were used for analysis. Results The overview includes 30 definitions of e-health and m-health, respectively. The definitions were thematised into 14 narrative themes. The results of the study, and primarily a three-level model, provide an understanding of how different types of e-health and m-health can be put into practice, and the effects or consequences of using them, which may be either positive or negative. Conclusions Mobility and flexibility is important for both m-health and e-health. Five keywords that characterize the definitions of e-health and m-health are “health”, “mobile”, “use”, “information”, and “technology”. E-health or m-health cannot replace human actors because e-health and m-health consist of social and material interactions. Using e-health and m-health is, thus, about developing healthcare without compromising native relics.http://e-hir.org/upload/pdf/hir-26-2-119.pdfdata miningmeaningful usehealth information exchangehealth information systemsterminology as topic
spellingShingle David Hallberg
Narges Salimi
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
Healthcare Informatics Research
data mining
meaningful use
health information exchange
health information systems
terminology as topic
title Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
title_full Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
title_fullStr Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
title_short Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health
title_sort qualitative and quantitative analysis of definitions of e health and m health
topic data mining
meaningful use
health information exchange
health information systems
terminology as topic
url http://e-hir.org/upload/pdf/hir-26-2-119.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT davidhallberg qualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofdefinitionsofehealthandmhealth
AT nargessalimi qualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofdefinitionsofehealthandmhealth