The case for well-conducted experiments to validate statistical protocols for 2D gels: different pre-processing = different lists of significant proteins
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The proteomics literature has seen a proliferation of publications that seek to apply the rapidly improving technology of 2D gels to study various biological systems. However, there is a dearth of systematic studies that have investi...
Main Authors: | Deshane Jessy, Meleth Sreelatha, Kim Helen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2005-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Biotechnology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/5/7 |
Similar Items
-
Clinical Significance of Statistical Differences
by: Luiz Maurino Abreu
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Plasma Protein Profiles Differ between Women Diagnosed with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 1 and 3
by: Chandrika J. Piyathilake, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01) -
Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) : methods and protocols /
by: Cramer, Rainer, et al.
Published: (c201) -
A statistical network pre-processing method to improve relevance and significance of gene lists in microarray gene expression studies
by: Giuseppe Agapito, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
How Concept Maps with and without a List of Concepts Differ: The Case of Statistics
by: Anastasia Kapuza
Published: (2020-03-01)