Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) and conventional circumcision (CC) in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the...
Main Authors: | Zhong-Chao Huo, Gang Liu, Xiao-Yan Li, Fei Liu, Wen-Ju Fan, Ru-Hua Guan, Pei-Feng Li, De-Yang Mo, Yong-Zhi He |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Asian Journal of Andrology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2017;volume=19;issue=3;spage=362;epage=367;aulast=Huo |
Similar Items
-
Age-specific Prevalence Rates of Phimosis and Circumcision in Taiwanese Boys
by: Ming-Chung Ko, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01) -
Circumcision with "no-flip Shang Ring" and "Dorsal Slit" methods for adult males: a single-centered, prospective, clinical study
by: Jun-Hao Lei, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Preputial retraction in children
by: Agarwal Abhinav, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01) -
Preputial circumcision performed with a new mechanical stapling tool. The “langhe disposable circumcision suture device”. Preliminary experiences
by: Diego Pozza, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device
by: Wei Jiang, MD, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)