Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court.
Article 10 (2) of the Law on the Organization and Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court determines the competence and ranges of the Court's powers to deal with and investigate objections and complaints against the final decisions of exceptional administrative authorities. According to t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_13878_3ee08819204010635837fc2e3ebba46d.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797359348382433280 |
|---|---|
| author | Hossein KAVIAR |
| author_facet | Hossein KAVIAR |
| author_sort | Hossein KAVIAR |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Article 10 (2) of the Law on the Organization and Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court determines the competence and ranges of the Court's powers to deal with and investigate objections and complaints against the final decisions of exceptional administrative authorities. According to the analysis of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice in decisions number 37, 38, 39 dated 1989/10/2 and also the branches of the Court from paragraph 2 of Article 10, only real or legal persons of private law are allowed to file complaints and objections against final decisions. Exceptional Administrative authorities and the legal persons of general law don’t have that kind of power.Recently, on 2020/7/14, according to the ,Uniform Judicial Precedent numbered 792 of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court, the jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court to review the appeal filed by the Regional State Water Company against the decision of the Commission for Groundwater Affairs is recognized. Now the question arises is that whether the Uniform Judicial Precedent No. 792 is exceptional and is only about appealing the indefinite opinions of the judge of the Groundwater Commission? |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:17:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7852467d194c41229b010e708579783a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2345-6116 2476-6216 |
| language | fas |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:17:19Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| spelling | doaj.art-7852467d194c41229b010e708579783a2024-01-10T10:52:31ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī2345-61162476-62162022-01-01237327930210.22054/qjpl.2021.57212.253313878Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court.Hossein KAVIAR0Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Arak UniversityArticle 10 (2) of the Law on the Organization and Procedure of the Administrative Justice Court determines the competence and ranges of the Court's powers to deal with and investigate objections and complaints against the final decisions of exceptional administrative authorities. According to the analysis of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice in decisions number 37, 38, 39 dated 1989/10/2 and also the branches of the Court from paragraph 2 of Article 10, only real or legal persons of private law are allowed to file complaints and objections against final decisions. Exceptional Administrative authorities and the legal persons of general law don’t have that kind of power.Recently, on 2020/7/14, according to the ,Uniform Judicial Precedent numbered 792 of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court, the jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court to review the appeal filed by the Regional State Water Company against the decision of the Commission for Groundwater Affairs is recognized. Now the question arises is that whether the Uniform Judicial Precedent No. 792 is exceptional and is only about appealing the indefinite opinions of the judge of the Groundwater Commission?https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_13878_3ee08819204010635837fc2e3ebba46d.pdfcourt of administrative justicethe investigation commission deal with groundwaterexceptional administrative authority opinionsrevision requestprocedural unity vote number 792 |
| spellingShingle | Hossein KAVIAR Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court. Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī court of administrative justice the investigation commission deal with groundwater exceptional administrative authority opinions revision request procedural unity vote number 792 |
| title | Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court. |
| title_full | Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court. |
| title_fullStr | Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court. |
| title_short | Jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court about the Review the Revision Request that Made by the Government into the Vote of Exceptional Administrative Authorities: According to the Decision of Unity Procedure Number 792 dated 1399/4/24 of the Supreme Court. |
| title_sort | jurisdiction of the administrative justice court about the review the revision request that made by the government into the vote of exceptional administrative authorities according to the decision of unity procedure number 792 dated 1399 4 24 of the supreme court |
| topic | court of administrative justice the investigation commission deal with groundwater exceptional administrative authority opinions revision request procedural unity vote number 792 |
| url | https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_13878_3ee08819204010635837fc2e3ebba46d.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hosseinkaviar jurisdictionoftheadministrativejusticecourtaboutthereviewtherevisionrequestthatmadebythegovernmentintothevoteofexceptionaladministrativeauthoritiesaccordingtothedecisionofunityprocedurenumber792dated1399424ofthesupremecourt |