Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression

Abstract Background Regeneration of neurons in the central nervous system is poor in humans. In other vertebrates neural regeneration does occur efficiently and involves reactivation of developmental processes. Within the neural retina of zebrafish, Müller glia are the main stem cell source and are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Ng Chi Kei, Peter David Currie, Patricia Regina Jusuf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-07-01
Series:Neural Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13064-017-0089-y
_version_ 1819054193419223040
author Jeremy Ng Chi Kei
Peter David Currie
Patricia Regina Jusuf
author_facet Jeremy Ng Chi Kei
Peter David Currie
Patricia Regina Jusuf
author_sort Jeremy Ng Chi Kei
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Regeneration of neurons in the central nervous system is poor in humans. In other vertebrates neural regeneration does occur efficiently and involves reactivation of developmental processes. Within the neural retina of zebrafish, Müller glia are the main stem cell source and are capable of generating progenitors to replace lost neurons after injury. However, it remains largely unknown to what extent Müller glia and neuron differentiation mirror development. Methods Following neural ablation in the zebrafish retina, dividing cells were tracked using a prolonged labelling technique. We investigated to what extent extrinsic feedback influences fate choices in two injury models, and whether fate specification follows the histogenic order observed in development. Results By comparing two injury paradigms that affect different subpopulations of neurons, we found a dynamic adaptability of fate choices during regeneration. Both injuries followed a similar time course of cell death, and activated Müller glia proliferation. However, these newly generated cells were initially biased towards replacing specifically the ablated cell types, and subsequently generating all cell types as the appropriate neuron proportions became re-established. This dynamic behaviour has implications for shaping regenerative processes and ensuring restoration of appropriate proportions of neuron types regardless of injury or cell type lost. Conclusions Our findings suggest that regenerative fate processes are more flexible than development processes. Compared to development fate specification we observed a disruption in stereotypical birth order of neurons during regeneration Understanding such feedback systems can allow us to direct regenerative fate specification in injury and diseases to regenerate specific neuron types in vivo.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:47:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78715311a6624f0f82fd9bb9ecabf479
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8104
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:47:44Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Neural Development
spelling doaj.art-78715311a6624f0f82fd9bb9ecabf4792022-12-21T19:03:35ZengBMCNeural Development1749-81042017-07-0112111410.1186/s13064-017-0089-yFate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progressionJeremy Ng Chi Kei0Peter David Currie1Patricia Regina Jusuf2Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash UniversityAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash UniversityAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash UniversityAbstract Background Regeneration of neurons in the central nervous system is poor in humans. In other vertebrates neural regeneration does occur efficiently and involves reactivation of developmental processes. Within the neural retina of zebrafish, Müller glia are the main stem cell source and are capable of generating progenitors to replace lost neurons after injury. However, it remains largely unknown to what extent Müller glia and neuron differentiation mirror development. Methods Following neural ablation in the zebrafish retina, dividing cells were tracked using a prolonged labelling technique. We investigated to what extent extrinsic feedback influences fate choices in two injury models, and whether fate specification follows the histogenic order observed in development. Results By comparing two injury paradigms that affect different subpopulations of neurons, we found a dynamic adaptability of fate choices during regeneration. Both injuries followed a similar time course of cell death, and activated Müller glia proliferation. However, these newly generated cells were initially biased towards replacing specifically the ablated cell types, and subsequently generating all cell types as the appropriate neuron proportions became re-established. This dynamic behaviour has implications for shaping regenerative processes and ensuring restoration of appropriate proportions of neuron types regardless of injury or cell type lost. Conclusions Our findings suggest that regenerative fate processes are more flexible than development processes. Compared to development fate specification we observed a disruption in stereotypical birth order of neurons during regeneration Understanding such feedback systems can allow us to direct regenerative fate specification in injury and diseases to regenerate specific neuron types in vivo.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13064-017-0089-yNeural regenerationZebrafishFate biasRetinaFate specification
spellingShingle Jeremy Ng Chi Kei
Peter David Currie
Patricia Regina Jusuf
Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
Neural Development
Neural regeneration
Zebrafish
Fate bias
Retina
Fate specification
title Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
title_full Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
title_fullStr Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
title_full_unstemmed Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
title_short Fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
title_sort fate bias during neural regeneration adjusts dynamically without recapitulating developmental fate progression
topic Neural regeneration
Zebrafish
Fate bias
Retina
Fate specification
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13064-017-0089-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyngchikei fatebiasduringneuralregenerationadjustsdynamicallywithoutrecapitulatingdevelopmentalfateprogression
AT peterdavidcurrie fatebiasduringneuralregenerationadjustsdynamicallywithoutrecapitulatingdevelopmentalfateprogression
AT patriciareginajusuf fatebiasduringneuralregenerationadjustsdynamicallywithoutrecapitulatingdevelopmentalfateprogression