526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: A Mayo Clinic in Florida committee completes 100+ Scientific Reviews annually through manual e-mail and Excel tracking, placing a manual burden on reviewers and coordinators. REDCap, an electronic data capture system, was leveraged to reduce the administrative burden.#_ftn1 #_ftnre...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124004485/type/journal_article |
| _version_ | 1797226892227510272 |
|---|---|
| author | Taylor Galloway Laura Hanson Lysette Elsner Margot Wrenn Carol Griffin Gregory S Day |
| author_facet | Taylor Galloway Laura Hanson Lysette Elsner Margot Wrenn Carol Griffin Gregory S Day |
| author_sort | Taylor Galloway |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: A Mayo Clinic in Florida committee completes 100+ Scientific Reviews annually through manual e-mail and Excel tracking, placing a manual burden on reviewers and coordinators. REDCap, an electronic data capture system, was leveraged to reduce the administrative burden.#_ftn1 #_ftnref2 METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Historically, emails were sent by a coordinator to physicians, requesting their initial review and following up with reminders. This process was tracked using Excel, presenting a need to make this process more efficient, so a workgroup was created. To ensure all perspectives were accounted for, the workgroup included the review coordinator, a physician reviewer, and study team members who submit development requests for studies. The process was mapped using the existing Excel spreadsheet, and email templates. Critical data elements were identified, ensuring the database would identify bottlenecks. Two REDCap instruments were then created: one to outline the coordinator workflow and a survey for physician reviewers to complete the scientific reviews. #_ftn2#_ftnref1 RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The workflow is live in REDCap and has effectively processed over 100 scientific reviews in <1 year. The system captures the review status and guides the coordinator through the workflow, capturing dates when tasks are completed. When review criteria are met, the database sends an email to the assigned reviewer. The email includes a link to a REDCap survey, containing all pertinent documents. The reviewer uploads their completed review form within the survey, if this is not completed within a given period, the database sends email reminders. Once the review is complete, a notification is sent to the review coordinator. The review workflow is accessible to the study team who requested scientific review, making them aware of their request status ad giving them access to the review the moment it is completed. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Leveraging REDCap has increased visibility, reduced overall manual processes, and simplified the reviewer burden by providing all the information needed in a single notification. REDCap is a cost-effective, impactful solution to simplifying administrative burden in managing committee reviews. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T14:32:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-787998a421774e8d9c604164d0673785 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2059-8661 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T14:32:07Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-787998a421774e8d9c604164d06737852024-04-03T02:00:21ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612024-04-01815615610.1017/cts.2024.448526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCapTaylor Galloway0Laura Hanson1Lysette Elsner2Margot Wrenn3Carol Griffin4Gregory S DayMayo ClinicMayo ClinicMayo ClinicMayo ClinicMayo ClinicOBJECTIVES/GOALS: A Mayo Clinic in Florida committee completes 100+ Scientific Reviews annually through manual e-mail and Excel tracking, placing a manual burden on reviewers and coordinators. REDCap, an electronic data capture system, was leveraged to reduce the administrative burden.#_ftn1 #_ftnref2 METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Historically, emails were sent by a coordinator to physicians, requesting their initial review and following up with reminders. This process was tracked using Excel, presenting a need to make this process more efficient, so a workgroup was created. To ensure all perspectives were accounted for, the workgroup included the review coordinator, a physician reviewer, and study team members who submit development requests for studies. The process was mapped using the existing Excel spreadsheet, and email templates. Critical data elements were identified, ensuring the database would identify bottlenecks. Two REDCap instruments were then created: one to outline the coordinator workflow and a survey for physician reviewers to complete the scientific reviews. #_ftn2#_ftnref1 RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The workflow is live in REDCap and has effectively processed over 100 scientific reviews in <1 year. The system captures the review status and guides the coordinator through the workflow, capturing dates when tasks are completed. When review criteria are met, the database sends an email to the assigned reviewer. The email includes a link to a REDCap survey, containing all pertinent documents. The reviewer uploads their completed review form within the survey, if this is not completed within a given period, the database sends email reminders. Once the review is complete, a notification is sent to the review coordinator. The review workflow is accessible to the study team who requested scientific review, making them aware of their request status ad giving them access to the review the moment it is completed. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Leveraging REDCap has increased visibility, reduced overall manual processes, and simplified the reviewer burden by providing all the information needed in a single notification. REDCap is a cost-effective, impactful solution to simplifying administrative burden in managing committee reviews.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124004485/type/journal_article |
| spellingShingle | Taylor Galloway Laura Hanson Lysette Elsner Margot Wrenn Carol Griffin Gregory S Day 526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| title | 526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap |
| title_full | 526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap |
| title_fullStr | 526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap |
| title_full_unstemmed | 526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap |
| title_short | 526 Administrative Simplification of Committee Reviews through REDCap |
| title_sort | 526 administrative simplification of committee reviews through redcap |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124004485/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorgalloway 526administrativesimplificationofcommitteereviewsthroughredcap AT laurahanson 526administrativesimplificationofcommitteereviewsthroughredcap AT lysetteelsner 526administrativesimplificationofcommitteereviewsthroughredcap AT margotwrenn 526administrativesimplificationofcommitteereviewsthroughredcap AT carolgriffin 526administrativesimplificationofcommitteereviewsthroughredcap AT gregorysday 526administrativesimplificationofcommitteereviewsthroughredcap |