Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation

Objective To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). Methods The K-SRMS was developed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mina Park, Ji-Yeong Lee, Yeajin Ham, Sang-Wook Oh, Joon-Ho Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2020-02-01
Series:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-2020-44-1-11.pdf
_version_ 1797715717647237120
author Mina Park
Ji-Yeong Lee
Yeajin Ham
Sang-Wook Oh
Joon-Ho Shin
author_facet Mina Park
Ji-Yeong Lee
Yeajin Ham
Sang-Wook Oh
Joon-Ho Shin
author_sort Mina Park
collection DOAJ
description Objective To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). Methods The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. Results The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. Conclusion The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:10:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78996074fc9b4c1693d7d0a62aad30cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-0645
2234-0653
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:10:49Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format Article
series Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
spelling doaj.art-78996074fc9b4c1693d7d0a62aad30cb2023-09-02T19:09:32ZengKorean Academy of Rehabilitation MedicineAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine2234-06452234-06532020-02-01441111910.5535/arm.2020.44.1.114137Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity EvaluationMina Park0Ji-Yeong Lee1Yeajin Ham2Sang-Wook Oh3Joon-Ho Shin Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, KoreaObjective To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). Methods The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. Results The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. Conclusion The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research.http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-2020-44-1-11.pdfmotivationreliability and validitystroke rehabilitationsurveys and questionnairestranslations
spellingShingle Mina Park
Ji-Yeong Lee
Yeajin Ham
Sang-Wook Oh
Joon-Ho Shin
Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
motivation
reliability and validity
stroke rehabilitation
surveys and questionnaires
translations
title Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_full Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_fullStr Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_short Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
title_sort korean version of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale reliability and validity evaluation
topic motivation
reliability and validity
stroke rehabilitation
surveys and questionnaires
translations
url http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-2020-44-1-11.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT minapark koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT jiyeonglee koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT yeajinham koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT sangwookoh koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation
AT joonhoshin koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation