Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
Objective To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). Methods The K-SRMS was developed...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-2020-44-1-11.pdf |
_version_ | 1797715717647237120 |
---|---|
author | Mina Park Ji-Yeong Lee Yeajin Ham Sang-Wook Oh Joon-Ho Shin |
author_facet | Mina Park Ji-Yeong Lee Yeajin Ham Sang-Wook Oh Joon-Ho Shin |
author_sort | Mina Park |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). Methods The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. Results The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. Conclusion The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:10:49Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-78996074fc9b4c1693d7d0a62aad30cb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2234-0645 2234-0653 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T08:10:49Z |
publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | Article |
series | Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-78996074fc9b4c1693d7d0a62aad30cb2023-09-02T19:09:32ZengKorean Academy of Rehabilitation MedicineAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine2234-06452234-06532020-02-01441111910.5535/arm.2020.44.1.114137Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity EvaluationMina Park0Ji-Yeong Lee1Yeajin Ham2Sang-Wook Oh3Joon-Ho Shin Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, KoreaObjective To translate the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (SRMS), developed to evaluate the motivation level of stroke patients during rehabilitation, into the Korean language and to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of SRMS (K-SRMS). Methods The K-SRMS was developed following a structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. K-SRMS reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. The reliability test was conducted in 50 stroke patients. Its validity was assessed by comparing the K-SRMS with the scale and performing exploratory factor analysis. The validity test was conducted in 102 stroke patients. Results The test–retest analysis showed good reliability, and the internal consistency of the K-SRMS was similar to that of the original version for all, except 4, items. Thus, these 4 items were excluded, and then the validity test was conducted. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the K-SRMS score was significantly correlated with the BAS total score (Pearson r=0.207, p<0.05). In the exploratory factor analysis, K-SRMS items were categorized into 7 groups (factors), and factors 1 and 4 showed mutual concordance with K-SRMS subscales, including intrinsic motivation factors and amotivation, respectively. Conclusion The newly developed K-SRMS showed good reliability and validity. It could also be used as a tool to objectify the degree of motivation for rehabilitation among stroke patients in clinical care and research.http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-2020-44-1-11.pdfmotivationreliability and validitystroke rehabilitationsurveys and questionnairestranslations |
spellingShingle | Mina Park Ji-Yeong Lee Yeajin Ham Sang-Wook Oh Joon-Ho Shin Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine motivation reliability and validity stroke rehabilitation surveys and questionnaires translations |
title | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_full | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_short | Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation |
title_sort | korean version of the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale reliability and validity evaluation |
topic | motivation reliability and validity stroke rehabilitation surveys and questionnaires translations |
url | http://www.e-arm.org/upload/pdf/arm-2020-44-1-11.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minapark koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT jiyeonglee koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT yeajinham koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT sangwookoh koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation AT joonhoshin koreanversionofthestrokerehabilitationmotivationscalereliabilityandvalidityevaluation |