LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE

Purpose: to assess the non-performance rate of primary PCI in STEMI patients and determine the factors influencing the choice of approach for the management of patients based on Kemerovo Cardiology Clinic's experience in 2012. Material and Methods: 492 patients aged 30 to 92 years, admitted to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. V. Kashtalap, A. M. Kochergina, S. A. Makarov, V. Yu. Kheraskov, O. L. Barbarash
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: InterMedservice 2016-03-01
Series:Евразийский Кардиологический Журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.heartj.asia/jour/article/view/5663
_version_ 1797879239160102912
author V. V. Kashtalap
A. M. Kochergina
S. A. Makarov
V. Yu. Kheraskov
O. L. Barbarash
author_facet V. V. Kashtalap
A. M. Kochergina
S. A. Makarov
V. Yu. Kheraskov
O. L. Barbarash
author_sort V. V. Kashtalap
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: to assess the non-performance rate of primary PCI in STEMI patients and determine the factors influencing the choice of approach for the management of patients based on Kemerovo Cardiology Clinic's experience in 2012. Material and Methods: 492 patients aged 30 to 92 years, admitted to the MBHI "Kemerovo Cardiology Dispensary" (the Regional Vascular Center in 2012 with a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) were included in the single-center prospective registry study. The mean age of patients was 64.42 ± 10.86 years. Results: over 20% of STEMI patients admitted to the Kemerovo Cardiology Dispensary did not undergo emergency coronary angiography (CAG). These patients were older, predominantly female (64%), commonly with repeated MI (44%) and with the presence of renal and myocardial dysfunction. The group of patients, who were not selected for CAG, had significant patient delay between onset of symptoms and hospital admission (9 hours from onset of symptoms to hospital admission in the group of patients who were selected to emergency CAG and 30 hours - in patients who were not selected for CAG). Conclusion: according to the results of the study, we determined a group of patients (up to 20%), who did not receive high-tech medical services because of time delay and had less favorable outcomes after STEMI. Therefore, the development of algorithms is particularly important as they can reduce the time delay in the pre-hospital period, as well as active patient selection for coronary angiography during the in-hospital period.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:45:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78b33056858c4594b0fbc36415c1a1a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-1685
2305-0748
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:45:42Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher InterMedservice
record_format Article
series Евразийский Кардиологический Журнал
spelling doaj.art-78b33056858c4594b0fbc36415c1a1a22023-03-13T07:47:27ZrusInterMedserviceЕвразийский Кардиологический Журнал2225-16852305-07482016-03-0101404610.38109/2225-1685-2016-1-40-465660LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICEV. V. Kashtalap0A. M. Kochergina1S. A. Makarov2V. Yu. Kheraskov3O. L. Barbarash4Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний»; Государственное бюджетное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Кемеровская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава РоссииФедеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний»; Государственное бюджетное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Кемеровская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава РоссииФедеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний»; Муниципальное бюджетное учреждение здравоохранения «Кемеровский кардиологический диспансер»Муниципальное бюджетное учреждение здравоохранения «Кемеровский кардиологический диспансер»Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний»; Государственное бюджетное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Кемеровская государственная медицинская академия Минздрава России; Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний»Purpose: to assess the non-performance rate of primary PCI in STEMI patients and determine the factors influencing the choice of approach for the management of patients based on Kemerovo Cardiology Clinic's experience in 2012. Material and Methods: 492 patients aged 30 to 92 years, admitted to the MBHI "Kemerovo Cardiology Dispensary" (the Regional Vascular Center in 2012 with a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) were included in the single-center prospective registry study. The mean age of patients was 64.42 ± 10.86 years. Results: over 20% of STEMI patients admitted to the Kemerovo Cardiology Dispensary did not undergo emergency coronary angiography (CAG). These patients were older, predominantly female (64%), commonly with repeated MI (44%) and with the presence of renal and myocardial dysfunction. The group of patients, who were not selected for CAG, had significant patient delay between onset of symptoms and hospital admission (9 hours from onset of symptoms to hospital admission in the group of patients who were selected to emergency CAG and 30 hours - in patients who were not selected for CAG). Conclusion: according to the results of the study, we determined a group of patients (up to 20%), who did not receive high-tech medical services because of time delay and had less favorable outcomes after STEMI. Therefore, the development of algorithms is particularly important as they can reduce the time delay in the pre-hospital period, as well as active patient selection for coronary angiography during the in-hospital period.https://www.heartj.asia/jour/article/view/5663инфаркт миокардапожилой возрастпервичное чрескожное коронарное вмешательствоmyocardial infarctionadvanced ageprimary percutaneous coronary intervention
spellingShingle V. V. Kashtalap
A. M. Kochergina
S. A. Makarov
V. Yu. Kheraskov
O. L. Barbarash
LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE
Евразийский Кардиологический Журнал
инфаркт миокарда
пожилой возраст
первичное чрескожное коронарное вмешательство
myocardial infarction
advanced age
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_full LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_fullStr LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_full_unstemmed LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_short LIMITATIONS ON PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE CLINICAL PRACTICE
title_sort limitations on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for st segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in the clinical practice
topic инфаркт миокарда
пожилой возраст
первичное чрескожное коронарное вмешательство
myocardial infarction
advanced age
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
url https://www.heartj.asia/jour/article/view/5663
work_keys_str_mv AT vvkashtalap limitationsonprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationacutemyocardialinfarctionintheclinicalpractice
AT amkochergina limitationsonprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationacutemyocardialinfarctionintheclinicalpractice
AT samakarov limitationsonprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationacutemyocardialinfarctionintheclinicalpractice
AT vyukheraskov limitationsonprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationacutemyocardialinfarctionintheclinicalpractice
AT olbarbarash limitationsonprimarypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationacutemyocardialinfarctionintheclinicalpractice