Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum

One hundred clinical isolates from a prospective nationwide study of scedosporiosis in Australia (2003–2005) and 46 additional isolates were genotyped by internal transcribed spacer–restriction fragment length polymorphism (ITS-RFLP) analysis, ITS sequencing, and M13 PCR fingerprinting. ITS-RFLP and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurence Delhaes, Azian Harun, Sharon C.A. Chen, Quoc Nguyen, Monica Slavin, Christopher H. Heath, Krystyna Maszewska, Catriona Halliday, Vincent Robert, Tania C. Sorrell, Wieland Meyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2008-02-01
Series:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/2/07-0920_article
_version_ 1828463499727077376
author Laurence Delhaes
Azian Harun
Sharon C.A. Chen
Quoc Nguyen
Monica Slavin
Christopher H. Heath
Krystyna Maszewska
Catriona Halliday
Vincent Robert
Tania C. Sorrell
Wieland Meyer
author_facet Laurence Delhaes
Azian Harun
Sharon C.A. Chen
Quoc Nguyen
Monica Slavin
Christopher H. Heath
Krystyna Maszewska
Catriona Halliday
Vincent Robert
Tania C. Sorrell
Wieland Meyer
author_sort Laurence Delhaes
collection DOAJ
description One hundred clinical isolates from a prospective nationwide study of scedosporiosis in Australia (2003–2005) and 46 additional isolates were genotyped by internal transcribed spacer–restriction fragment length polymorphism (ITS-RFLP) analysis, ITS sequencing, and M13 PCR fingerprinting. ITS-RFLP and PCR fingerprinting identified 3 distinct genetic groups. The first group corresponded to Scedosporium prolificans (n = 83), and the other 2 comprised isolates previously identified as S. apiospermum: one of these corresponded to S. apiospermum (n = 33) and the other to the newly described species S. aurantiacum (n = 30). Intraspecies variation was highest for S. apiospermum (58%), followed by S. prolificans (45%) and S. aurantiacum (28%) as determined by PCR fingerprinting. ITS sequence variation of 2.2% was observed among S. apiospermum isolates. No correlation was found between genotype of strains and their geographic origin, body site from which they were cultured, or colonization versus invasive disease. Twelve S. prolificans isolates from 2 suspected case clusters were examined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. No specific clusters were confirmed.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T02:55:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78b69f977ba14e3eb3f7ea6fbf249c0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1080-6040
1080-6059
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T02:55:56Z
publishDate 2008-02-01
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format Article
series Emerging Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-78b69f977ba14e3eb3f7ea6fbf249c0f2022-12-22T01:23:10ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592008-02-0114228229010.3201/eid1402.070920Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacumLaurence DelhaesAzian HarunSharon C.A. ChenQuoc NguyenMonica SlavinChristopher H. HeathKrystyna MaszewskaCatriona HallidayVincent RobertTania C. SorrellWieland MeyerOne hundred clinical isolates from a prospective nationwide study of scedosporiosis in Australia (2003–2005) and 46 additional isolates were genotyped by internal transcribed spacer–restriction fragment length polymorphism (ITS-RFLP) analysis, ITS sequencing, and M13 PCR fingerprinting. ITS-RFLP and PCR fingerprinting identified 3 distinct genetic groups. The first group corresponded to Scedosporium prolificans (n = 83), and the other 2 comprised isolates previously identified as S. apiospermum: one of these corresponded to S. apiospermum (n = 33) and the other to the newly described species S. aurantiacum (n = 30). Intraspecies variation was highest for S. apiospermum (58%), followed by S. prolificans (45%) and S. aurantiacum (28%) as determined by PCR fingerprinting. ITS sequence variation of 2.2% was observed among S. apiospermum isolates. No correlation was found between genotype of strains and their geographic origin, body site from which they were cultured, or colonization versus invasive disease. Twelve S. prolificans isolates from 2 suspected case clusters were examined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. No specific clusters were confirmed.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/2/07-0920_articleScedosporium prolificansScedosporium aurantiacumScedosporium apiospermummolecular epidemiologyITS-sequencingITS-RFLP
spellingShingle Laurence Delhaes
Azian Harun
Sharon C.A. Chen
Quoc Nguyen
Monica Slavin
Christopher H. Heath
Krystyna Maszewska
Catriona Halliday
Vincent Robert
Tania C. Sorrell
Wieland Meyer
Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Scedosporium prolificans
Scedosporium aurantiacum
Scedosporium apiospermum
molecular epidemiology
ITS-sequencing
ITS-RFLP
title Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum
title_full Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum
title_fullStr Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum
title_short Molecular Typing of Australian Scedosporium Isolates Showing Genetic Variability and Numerous S. aurantiacum
title_sort molecular typing of australian scedosporium isolates showing genetic variability and numerous s aurantiacum
topic Scedosporium prolificans
Scedosporium aurantiacum
Scedosporium apiospermum
molecular epidemiology
ITS-sequencing
ITS-RFLP
url https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/2/07-0920_article
work_keys_str_mv AT laurencedelhaes moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT azianharun moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT sharoncachen moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT quocnguyen moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT monicaslavin moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT christopherhheath moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT krystynamaszewska moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT catrionahalliday moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT vincentrobert moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT taniacsorrell moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum
AT wielandmeyer moleculartypingofaustralianscedosporiumisolatesshowinggeneticvariabilityandnumeroussaurantiacum