Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales

Purpose: This study was conducted to obtain data for the development of an effective fall risk assessment tool for pediatric inpatients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of existing scales. Methods: A literature search using Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eun Joo Kim, Ji Young Lim, Geun Myun Kim, Mi Kyung Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing 2019-01-01
Series:Child Health Nursing Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-chnr.org/upload/pdf/chnr-25-1-56.pdf
_version_ 1818644935911407616
author Eun Joo Kim
Ji Young Lim
Geun Myun Kim
Mi Kyung Lee
author_facet Eun Joo Kim
Ji Young Lim
Geun Myun Kim
Mi Kyung Lee
author_sort Eun Joo Kim
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study was conducted to obtain data for the development of an effective fall risk assessment tool for pediatric inpatients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of existing scales. Methods: A literature search using Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed between March 1 and 31, 2018. Of 890 identified papers, 10 were selected for review. Nine were used in the meta-analysis. Stata version 14.0 was used to create forest plots of sensitivity and specificity. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare all diagnostic test accuracies. Results: Four studies used the Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale. The most common items included the patient's diagnoses, use of sedative medications, and mobility. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the nine studies were .79 and .36, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the low specificity of the pediatric fall risk assessment scales currently available, there is a need to subdivide scoring categories and to minimize items that are evaluated using nurses' subjective judgment alone. Fall risk assessment scales should be incorporated into the electronic medical record system and an automated scoring system should be developed.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T00:22:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78b6ccc6a78b417d87fb886c568c50c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-9110
2287-9129
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T00:22:46Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing
record_format Article
series Child Health Nursing Research
spelling doaj.art-78b6ccc6a78b417d87fb886c568c50c22022-12-21T22:10:32ZengKorean Academy of Child Health NursingChild Health Nursing Research2287-91102287-91292019-01-01251566410.4094/chnr.2019.25.1.561630Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment ScalesEun Joo Kim0Ji Young Lim1Geun Myun Kim2Mi Kyung Lee3 Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, WonJu, Korea Professor, Department of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Korea Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, WonJu, Korea PhD Candidate, Department of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, KoreaPurpose: This study was conducted to obtain data for the development of an effective fall risk assessment tool for pediatric inpatients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of existing scales. Methods: A literature search using Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed between March 1 and 31, 2018. Of 890 identified papers, 10 were selected for review. Nine were used in the meta-analysis. Stata version 14.0 was used to create forest plots of sensitivity and specificity. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare all diagnostic test accuracies. Results: Four studies used the Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale. The most common items included the patient's diagnoses, use of sedative medications, and mobility. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the nine studies were .79 and .36, respectively. Conclusion: Considering the low specificity of the pediatric fall risk assessment scales currently available, there is a need to subdivide scoring categories and to minimize items that are evaluated using nurses' subjective judgment alone. Fall risk assessment scales should be incorporated into the electronic medical record system and an automated scoring system should be developed.http://www.e-chnr.org/upload/pdf/chnr-25-1-56.pdfFallsRiskSensitivity and specificityPediatrics
spellingShingle Eun Joo Kim
Ji Young Lim
Geun Myun Kim
Mi Kyung Lee
Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales
Child Health Nursing Research
Falls
Risk
Sensitivity and specificity
Pediatrics
title Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales
title_full Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales
title_short Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pediatric Inpatient Fall Risk Assessment Scales
title_sort meta analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of pediatric inpatient fall risk assessment scales
topic Falls
Risk
Sensitivity and specificity
Pediatrics
url http://www.e-chnr.org/upload/pdf/chnr-25-1-56.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eunjookim metaanalysisofthediagnostictestaccuracyofpediatricinpatientfallriskassessmentscales
AT jiyounglim metaanalysisofthediagnostictestaccuracyofpediatricinpatientfallriskassessmentscales
AT geunmyunkim metaanalysisofthediagnostictestaccuracyofpediatricinpatientfallriskassessmentscales
AT mikyunglee metaanalysisofthediagnostictestaccuracyofpediatricinpatientfallriskassessmentscales