User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review

Abstract Background Over the past decade, an increasing number of low- and middle-income countries have reduced or removed user fees for pregnant women and/or children under five as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage. Despite the large number of studies (including meta-analyses and syst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Veronique Plouffe, Frank Bicaba, Abel Bicaba, Thomas Druetz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05835-w
_version_ 1818550910039621632
author Veronique Plouffe
Frank Bicaba
Abel Bicaba
Thomas Druetz
author_facet Veronique Plouffe
Frank Bicaba
Abel Bicaba
Thomas Druetz
author_sort Veronique Plouffe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Over the past decade, an increasing number of low- and middle-income countries have reduced or removed user fees for pregnant women and/or children under five as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage. Despite the large number of studies (including meta-analyses and systematic reviews) that have shown this strategy’s positive effects impact on health-related indicators, the repercussions on women’s empowerment or gender equality has been overlooked in the literature. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the association between user fee policies in low- and middle-income countries and women’s empowerment. Methods A systematic scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers conducted the database search in six health-focused databases (Pubmed, CAB Abstracts, Embase, Medline, Global Health, EBM Reviews) using English key words. The database search was conducted on February 20, 2020, with no publication date limitation. Qualitative analysis of the included articles was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. The material was organized based on the Gender at Work analytical framework. Results Out of the 206 initial records, nine articles were included in the review. The study settings include three low-income countries (Burkina Faso, Mali, Sierra Leone) and two lower-middle countries (Kenya, India). Four of them examine a direct association between user fee policies and women’s empowerment, while the others address this issue indirectly —mostly by examining gender equality or women’s decision-making in the context of free healthcare. The evidence suggests that user fee removal contributes to improving women’s capability to make health decisions through different mechanisms, but that the impact is limited. In the context of free healthcare, women’s healthcare decision-making power remains undermined because of social norms that are prevalent in the household, the community and the healthcare centers. In addition, women continue to endure limited access to and control over resources (mainly education, information and economic resources). Conclusion User fee removal policies alone are not enough to improve women’s healthcare decision-making power. Comprehensive and multi-sectoral approaches are needed to bring sustainable change regarding women’s empowerment. A focus on “gender equitable access to healthcare” is needed to reconcile women’s empowerment and the efforts to achieve universal health coverage.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:52:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78bb79b5ff634da08a3c188deaeb0516
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:52:49Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-78bb79b5ff634da08a3c188deaeb05162022-12-22T00:30:07ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-10-0120111410.1186/s12913-020-05835-wUser fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping reviewVeronique Plouffe0Frank Bicaba1Abel Bicaba2Thomas Druetz3Independent ConsultantSociété d’Études et de Recherches en Santé Publique (SERSAP)Société d’Études et de Recherches en Santé Publique (SERSAP)University of Montreal School of Public HealthAbstract Background Over the past decade, an increasing number of low- and middle-income countries have reduced or removed user fees for pregnant women and/or children under five as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage. Despite the large number of studies (including meta-analyses and systematic reviews) that have shown this strategy’s positive effects impact on health-related indicators, the repercussions on women’s empowerment or gender equality has been overlooked in the literature. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the association between user fee policies in low- and middle-income countries and women’s empowerment. Methods A systematic scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers conducted the database search in six health-focused databases (Pubmed, CAB Abstracts, Embase, Medline, Global Health, EBM Reviews) using English key words. The database search was conducted on February 20, 2020, with no publication date limitation. Qualitative analysis of the included articles was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. The material was organized based on the Gender at Work analytical framework. Results Out of the 206 initial records, nine articles were included in the review. The study settings include three low-income countries (Burkina Faso, Mali, Sierra Leone) and two lower-middle countries (Kenya, India). Four of them examine a direct association between user fee policies and women’s empowerment, while the others address this issue indirectly —mostly by examining gender equality or women’s decision-making in the context of free healthcare. The evidence suggests that user fee removal contributes to improving women’s capability to make health decisions through different mechanisms, but that the impact is limited. In the context of free healthcare, women’s healthcare decision-making power remains undermined because of social norms that are prevalent in the household, the community and the healthcare centers. In addition, women continue to endure limited access to and control over resources (mainly education, information and economic resources). Conclusion User fee removal policies alone are not enough to improve women’s healthcare decision-making power. Comprehensive and multi-sectoral approaches are needed to bring sustainable change regarding women’s empowerment. A focus on “gender equitable access to healthcare” is needed to reconcile women’s empowerment and the efforts to achieve universal health coverage.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05835-wWomen’s empowermentwomen’s agencyUser fee policiesAccess to healthcareSystematic reviewLow- and middle-income countries
spellingShingle Veronique Plouffe
Frank Bicaba
Abel Bicaba
Thomas Druetz
User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review
BMC Health Services Research
Women’s empowerment
women’s agency
User fee policies
Access to healthcare
Systematic review
Low- and middle-income countries
title User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review
title_full User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review
title_short User fee policies and women’s empowerment: a systematic scoping review
title_sort user fee policies and women s empowerment a systematic scoping review
topic Women’s empowerment
women’s agency
User fee policies
Access to healthcare
Systematic review
Low- and middle-income countries
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05835-w
work_keys_str_mv AT veroniqueplouffe userfeepoliciesandwomensempowermentasystematicscopingreview
AT frankbicaba userfeepoliciesandwomensempowermentasystematicscopingreview
AT abelbicaba userfeepoliciesandwomensempowermentasystematicscopingreview
AT thomasdruetz userfeepoliciesandwomensempowermentasystematicscopingreview