Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract Background Low‐molecular‐weight‐heparins (LMWHs) have been established for the treatment of cancer‐associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with LMWHs. The aim of this systematic review a...
Main Authors: | Florian Moik, Florian Posch, Christoph Zielinski, Ingrid Pabinger, Cihan Ay |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12359 |
Similar Items
-
Asymptomatic “breakthrough” thrombosis and anticoagulant “failure”: Keep calm and carry on
by: Sven R. Olson, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: The present state of the art
by: Johannes eThaler, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Venous thrombosis recurrence risk according to warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of venous thrombosis
by: Neil A. Zakai, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Risk assessment for recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
by: Cornelia Englisch, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparins for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis
by: Kaidireyahan Wumaier, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)