GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists

<b>Objective:</b> To investigate the association between GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) and mortality and bleeding in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to myocardial infarction (MI) who were mechanically ventilated on admission. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectivel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vojko Kanic, Gregor Kompara, David Suran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/24/7426
_version_ 1797457068433604608
author Vojko Kanic
Gregor Kompara
David Suran
author_facet Vojko Kanic
Gregor Kompara
David Suran
author_sort Vojko Kanic
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objective:</b> To investigate the association between GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) and mortality and bleeding in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to myocardial infarction (MI) who were mechanically ventilated on admission. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively divided 153 patients into two groups (with or without GPI). Thirty-day and one-year all-cause mortality and bleeding were studied. <b>Results</b>: The observed 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality were similar in both groups [54 (69.2%) with GPI vs. 62 (82.7%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.06, and 60 (76.9%) with GPI vs. 64 (85.3%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.22, respectively]. Patients with GPI suffered fewer unsuccessful PCI (TIMI 0/1 was 10% in the GPI group vs. 57% in the group without GPI), experienced more improvements in TIMI ≥ 1 flow [68 (87.2%) in the GPI group vs. 38 (50.7%) without GPI; <i>p</i> < 0.0001], and they achieved better cerebral performance category (CPC) scores (1.61 ± 0.99 with GPI vs. 2.76 ± 1.64 without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.005). The bleeding rate was similar in patients with and without GPI [33 (42.3%) vs. 31 (41.3%): <i>p</i> = 1.00], in patients with P2Y12 receptor antagonists (P2Y12) [18 (46.1%) with GPI vs. 21 (46.7%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 1.00], and in patients with potent P2Y12 [8 (30.8%) with GPI vs. 9 (37.5%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.77]. <b>Conclusions</b>: Due to the study design (limited sample size, retrospective inclusion with high risk of selection bias), our analysis does not allow us to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of GPI in this context. Despite all these limitations, GPI were associated with improved TIMI flow after PCI in our multivariable model without increasing bleeding rates. In addition, better CPC scores were observed, but no association between GPI and outcome was found. Our analysis suggests that selective use of GPI may be beneficial in mechanically ventilated patients with MI in CS without additional bleeding risk, even in the era of potent P2Y12.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:16:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-78e3fac745de4f5c99519fb3faf15005
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:16:54Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-78e3fac745de4f5c99519fb3faf150052023-11-24T15:45:23ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-12-011124742610.3390/jcm11247426GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor AntagonistsVojko Kanic0Gregor Kompara1David Suran2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Maribor, 2000 Maribor, SloveniaDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Maribor, 2000 Maribor, SloveniaDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia<b>Objective:</b> To investigate the association between GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) and mortality and bleeding in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to myocardial infarction (MI) who were mechanically ventilated on admission. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively divided 153 patients into two groups (with or without GPI). Thirty-day and one-year all-cause mortality and bleeding were studied. <b>Results</b>: The observed 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality were similar in both groups [54 (69.2%) with GPI vs. 62 (82.7%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.06, and 60 (76.9%) with GPI vs. 64 (85.3%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.22, respectively]. Patients with GPI suffered fewer unsuccessful PCI (TIMI 0/1 was 10% in the GPI group vs. 57% in the group without GPI), experienced more improvements in TIMI ≥ 1 flow [68 (87.2%) in the GPI group vs. 38 (50.7%) without GPI; <i>p</i> < 0.0001], and they achieved better cerebral performance category (CPC) scores (1.61 ± 0.99 with GPI vs. 2.76 ± 1.64 without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.005). The bleeding rate was similar in patients with and without GPI [33 (42.3%) vs. 31 (41.3%): <i>p</i> = 1.00], in patients with P2Y12 receptor antagonists (P2Y12) [18 (46.1%) with GPI vs. 21 (46.7%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 1.00], and in patients with potent P2Y12 [8 (30.8%) with GPI vs. 9 (37.5%) without GPI; <i>p</i> = 0.77]. <b>Conclusions</b>: Due to the study design (limited sample size, retrospective inclusion with high risk of selection bias), our analysis does not allow us to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of GPI in this context. Despite all these limitations, GPI were associated with improved TIMI flow after PCI in our multivariable model without increasing bleeding rates. In addition, better CPC scores were observed, but no association between GPI and outcome was found. Our analysis suggests that selective use of GPI may be beneficial in mechanically ventilated patients with MI in CS without additional bleeding risk, even in the era of potent P2Y12.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/24/7426cardiogenic shockGP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitormechanical ventilationmyocardial infarctionP2Y12 receptor antagonistoutcome
spellingShingle Vojko Kanic
Gregor Kompara
David Suran
GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists
Journal of Clinical Medicine
cardiogenic shock
GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor
mechanical ventilation
myocardial infarction
P2Y12 receptor antagonist
outcome
title GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists
title_full GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists
title_fullStr GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists
title_full_unstemmed GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists
title_short GP IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists
title_sort gp iib iiia receptor inhibitors in mechanically ventilated patients with cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction in the era of potent p2y12 receptor antagonists
topic cardiogenic shock
GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor
mechanical ventilation
myocardial infarction
P2Y12 receptor antagonist
outcome
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/24/7426
work_keys_str_mv AT vojkokanic gpiibiiiareceptorinhibitorsinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcardiogenicshockduetomyocardialinfarctionintheeraofpotentp2y12receptorantagonists
AT gregorkompara gpiibiiiareceptorinhibitorsinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcardiogenicshockduetomyocardialinfarctionintheeraofpotentp2y12receptorantagonists
AT davidsuran gpiibiiiareceptorinhibitorsinmechanicallyventilatedpatientswithcardiogenicshockduetomyocardialinfarctionintheeraofpotentp2y12receptorantagonists