Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways
This paper explores connections between Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis, focusing on an eco-friendly farm in Norfolk which features in a long-running BBC programme, ‘the Countryside Hour’. Both ecolinguistics and positive discourse analysis, as relatively new disciplines, stand in som...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Bologna
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | MediAzioni |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://mediazioni.unibo.it/article/view/15506 |
| _version_ | 1797668574892916736 |
|---|---|
| author | Douglas Mark Ponton |
| author_facet | Douglas Mark Ponton |
| author_sort | Douglas Mark Ponton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper explores connections between Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis, focusing on an eco-friendly farm in Norfolk which features in a long-running BBC programme, ‘the Countryside Hour’. Both ecolinguistics and positive discourse analysis, as relatively new disciplines, stand in some need of definition, especially regarding their relationship with the more consolidated paradigm of CDA which, of course, is itself not characterised by general agreement on methodological matters (Flowerdew 2008, Stibbe 2017). This study applies some of the notions found in the practical toolkit of CDA such as framing, presupposition, metaphor analysis, pragmatics and relevance theory and explores their functioning as heuristic methods in data that is regarded as ecologically ‘positive’. Unlike traditional critical studies of harmful environmental practices which expose deviant discursive practices, the starting point is discourse that concords with current mediated notions of environmental sustainability. The aim is not simply to give such contexts, and such discourse, publicity, and nor is it to seek solace in ‘discourse that inspires, encourages, heartens, discourse we like, that cheers us along’ (Martin 1999, pp. 51–52). Rather, it is to shed light on underlying processes at the level of ideologies (in the sense of Fairclough 2003: 9); to make manifest thoughts, feelings and discourses which are felt to be ‘positive’, in a mirror image of what occurs in CDA studies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T20:30:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-78f567e885484647baa1fef767fcd789 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1974-4382 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T20:30:17Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | University of Bologna |
| record_format | Article |
| series | MediAzioni |
| spelling | doaj.art-78f567e885484647baa1fef767fcd7892023-10-02T09:14:42ZengUniversity of BolognaMediAzioni1974-43822022-09-0134A36A5410.6092/issn.1974-4382/1550613847Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent PathwaysDouglas Mark Ponton0Università degli Studi di CataniaThis paper explores connections between Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis, focusing on an eco-friendly farm in Norfolk which features in a long-running BBC programme, ‘the Countryside Hour’. Both ecolinguistics and positive discourse analysis, as relatively new disciplines, stand in some need of definition, especially regarding their relationship with the more consolidated paradigm of CDA which, of course, is itself not characterised by general agreement on methodological matters (Flowerdew 2008, Stibbe 2017). This study applies some of the notions found in the practical toolkit of CDA such as framing, presupposition, metaphor analysis, pragmatics and relevance theory and explores their functioning as heuristic methods in data that is regarded as ecologically ‘positive’. Unlike traditional critical studies of harmful environmental practices which expose deviant discursive practices, the starting point is discourse that concords with current mediated notions of environmental sustainability. The aim is not simply to give such contexts, and such discourse, publicity, and nor is it to seek solace in ‘discourse that inspires, encourages, heartens, discourse we like, that cheers us along’ (Martin 1999, pp. 51–52). Rather, it is to shed light on underlying processes at the level of ideologies (in the sense of Fairclough 2003: 9); to make manifest thoughts, feelings and discourses which are felt to be ‘positive’, in a mirror image of what occurs in CDA studies.https://mediazioni.unibo.it/article/view/15506positive discourse analysisecolinguisticsecological farmingideologyimplicaturehigh ash farm |
| spellingShingle | Douglas Mark Ponton Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways MediAzioni positive discourse analysis ecolinguistics ecological farming ideology implicature high ash farm |
| title | Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways |
| title_full | Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways |
| title_fullStr | Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways |
| title_short | Ecolinguistics and Positive Discourse Analysis: Convergent Pathways |
| title_sort | ecolinguistics and positive discourse analysis convergent pathways |
| topic | positive discourse analysis ecolinguistics ecological farming ideology implicature high ash farm |
| url | https://mediazioni.unibo.it/article/view/15506 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasmarkponton ecolinguisticsandpositivediscourseanalysisconvergentpathways |