Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in cycling are well-documented. However, most analyses of gender differences make broad comparisons, with few studies modeling male and female cycling patterns separately for recreational and transport cycling. Thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heesch Kristiann C, Sahlqvist Shannon, Garrard Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/106
_version_ 1819027772172926976
author Heesch Kristiann C
Sahlqvist Shannon
Garrard Jan
author_facet Heesch Kristiann C
Sahlqvist Shannon
Garrard Jan
author_sort Heesch Kristiann C
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in cycling are well-documented. However, most analyses of gender differences make broad comparisons, with few studies modeling male and female cycling patterns separately for recreational and transport cycling. This modeling is important, in order to improve our efforts to promote cycling to women and men in countries like Australia with low rates of transport cycling. The main aim of this study was to examine gender differences in cycling patterns and in motivators and constraints to cycling, separately for recreational and transport cycling.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Adult members of a Queensland, Australia, community bicycling organization completed an online survey about their cycling patterns; cycling purposes; and personal, social and perceived environmental motivators and constraints (47% response rate). Closed and open-end questions were completed. Using the quantitative data, multivariable linear, logistic and ordinal regression models were used to examine associations between gender and cycling patterns, motivators and constraints. The qualitative data were thematically analyzed to expand upon the quantitative findings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this sample of 1862 bicyclists, men were more likely than women to cycle for recreation and for transport, and they cycled for longer. Most transport cycling was for commuting, with men more likely than women to commute by bicycle. Men were more likely to cycle on-road, and women off-road. However, most men and women did not prefer to cycle on-road without designed bicycle lanes, and qualitative data indicated a strong preference by men and women for bicycle-only off-road paths. Both genders reported personal factors (health and enjoyment related) as motivators for cycling, although women were more likely to agree that other personal, social and environmental factors were also motivating. The main constraints for both genders and both cycling purposes were perceived environmental factors related to traffic conditions, motorist aggression and safety. Women, however, reported more constraints, and were more likely to report as constraints other environmental factors and personal factors.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Differences found in men’s and women’s cycling patterns, motivators and constraints should be considered in efforts to promote cycling, particularly in efforts to increase cycling for transport.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:47:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-79062a4504a24d288ca341c1d193d3a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-5868
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:47:47Z
publishDate 2012-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
spelling doaj.art-79062a4504a24d288ca341c1d193d3a22022-12-21T19:14:05ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682012-09-019110610.1186/1479-5868-9-106Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraintsHeesch Kristiann CSahlqvist ShannonGarrard Jan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gender differences in cycling are well-documented. However, most analyses of gender differences make broad comparisons, with few studies modeling male and female cycling patterns separately for recreational and transport cycling. This modeling is important, in order to improve our efforts to promote cycling to women and men in countries like Australia with low rates of transport cycling. The main aim of this study was to examine gender differences in cycling patterns and in motivators and constraints to cycling, separately for recreational and transport cycling.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Adult members of a Queensland, Australia, community bicycling organization completed an online survey about their cycling patterns; cycling purposes; and personal, social and perceived environmental motivators and constraints (47% response rate). Closed and open-end questions were completed. Using the quantitative data, multivariable linear, logistic and ordinal regression models were used to examine associations between gender and cycling patterns, motivators and constraints. The qualitative data were thematically analyzed to expand upon the quantitative findings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this sample of 1862 bicyclists, men were more likely than women to cycle for recreation and for transport, and they cycled for longer. Most transport cycling was for commuting, with men more likely than women to commute by bicycle. Men were more likely to cycle on-road, and women off-road. However, most men and women did not prefer to cycle on-road without designed bicycle lanes, and qualitative data indicated a strong preference by men and women for bicycle-only off-road paths. Both genders reported personal factors (health and enjoyment related) as motivators for cycling, although women were more likely to agree that other personal, social and environmental factors were also motivating. The main constraints for both genders and both cycling purposes were perceived environmental factors related to traffic conditions, motorist aggression and safety. Women, however, reported more constraints, and were more likely to report as constraints other environmental factors and personal factors.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Differences found in men’s and women’s cycling patterns, motivators and constraints should be considered in efforts to promote cycling, particularly in efforts to increase cycling for transport.</p>http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/106BicyclingGenderExercisePhysical activityActive transportHealth promotion
spellingShingle Heesch Kristiann C
Sahlqvist Shannon
Garrard Jan
Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Bicycling
Gender
Exercise
Physical activity
Active transport
Health promotion
title Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints
title_full Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints
title_fullStr Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints
title_short Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints
title_sort gender differences in recreational and transport cycling a cross sectional mixed methods comparison of cycling patterns motivators and constraints
topic Bicycling
Gender
Exercise
Physical activity
Active transport
Health promotion
url http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/106
work_keys_str_mv AT heeschkristiannc genderdifferencesinrecreationalandtransportcyclingacrosssectionalmixedmethodscomparisonofcyclingpatternsmotivatorsandconstraints
AT sahlqvistshannon genderdifferencesinrecreationalandtransportcyclingacrosssectionalmixedmethodscomparisonofcyclingpatternsmotivatorsandconstraints
AT garrardjan genderdifferencesinrecreationalandtransportcyclingacrosssectionalmixedmethodscomparisonofcyclingpatternsmotivatorsandconstraints