Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271

A major problem in all European Union (EU) budgetary negotiations is the approach of Member States in net return terms (the fair-return approach). EU members compare their contributions to the EU budget with transfers that they receive from the budget. Net payers tend to reduce the size of the budge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-09-01
Series:International Journal of Management and Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2020-0018
_version_ 1818343151546400768
author Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta
author_facet Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta
author_sort Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta
collection DOAJ
description A major problem in all European Union (EU) budgetary negotiations is the approach of Member States in net return terms (the fair-return approach). EU members compare their contributions to the EU budget with transfers that they receive from the budget. Net payers tend to reduce the size of the budget to contribute less. Brexit has aggravated the problem of the size of revenue (due to the United Kingdom's position as a big net payer). Also, new expenditure needs have arisen (for protecting external borders and climate, innovation, etc.). To address those needs, in 2018, the Commission submitted three proposals to supplement the current resources to finance the EU budget after the expiry of the principles of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2014–2020 at the end of 2020. The article aims to indicate whether the Commission's proposals are good instruments for the financing of the EU budget. The assessment relies on selected criteria based on theory. It also takes account of the feasibility of the proposals. The main conclusion is that none of the proposals meets well theoretical criteria of “genuine” EU revenue. Also, for practical reasons, it will be difficult for the Member States to come to an agreement on new budgetary resources. All proposals would be relatively costly for Poland.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:26:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-791192fdebcb43b080d57679c97015a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2299-9701
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:26:02Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series International Journal of Management and Economics
spelling doaj.art-791192fdebcb43b080d57679c97015a62022-12-21T23:38:36ZengSciendoInternational Journal of Management and Economics2299-97012020-09-0156319320810.2478/ijme-2020-0018Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta0Collegium of World Economy, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, PolandA major problem in all European Union (EU) budgetary negotiations is the approach of Member States in net return terms (the fair-return approach). EU members compare their contributions to the EU budget with transfers that they receive from the budget. Net payers tend to reduce the size of the budget to contribute less. Brexit has aggravated the problem of the size of revenue (due to the United Kingdom's position as a big net payer). Also, new expenditure needs have arisen (for protecting external borders and climate, innovation, etc.). To address those needs, in 2018, the Commission submitted three proposals to supplement the current resources to finance the EU budget after the expiry of the principles of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2014–2020 at the end of 2020. The article aims to indicate whether the Commission's proposals are good instruments for the financing of the EU budget. The assessment relies on selected criteria based on theory. It also takes account of the feasibility of the proposals. The main conclusion is that none of the proposals meets well theoretical criteria of “genuine” EU revenue. Also, for practical reasons, it will be difficult for the Member States to come to an agreement on new budgetary resources. All proposals would be relatively costly for Poland.https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2020-0018eu budgeteu multiannual financial frameworkown resourceseu taxesh21h61h77h87
spellingShingle Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta
Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271
International Journal of Management and Economics
eu budget
eu multiannual financial framework
own resources
eu taxes
h21
h61
h77
h87
title Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271
title_full Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271
title_fullStr Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271
title_short Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271
title_sort assessment of the european commission s proposals for financing the eu budget in 2021 20271
topic eu budget
eu multiannual financial framework
own resources
eu taxes
h21
h61
h77
h87
url https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2020-0018
work_keys_str_mv AT kaweckawyrzykowskaelzbieta assessmentoftheeuropeancommissionsproposalsforfinancingtheeubudgetin202120271