Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Emergency Departments (ED) in Switzerland are faced with increasing numbers of patients seeking non-urgent treatment. The high rate of walks-ins with conditions that may be treated in primary care has led to suggestions that those pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eichler Klaus, Zoller Marco, Rosemann Thomas, Huber Carola A, Chmiel Corinne, Sidler Patrick, Senn Oliver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/94
_version_ 1818157998675066880
author Eichler Klaus
Zoller Marco
Rosemann Thomas
Huber Carola A
Chmiel Corinne
Sidler Patrick
Senn Oliver
author_facet Eichler Klaus
Zoller Marco
Rosemann Thomas
Huber Carola A
Chmiel Corinne
Sidler Patrick
Senn Oliver
author_sort Eichler Klaus
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Emergency Departments (ED) in Switzerland are faced with increasing numbers of patients seeking non-urgent treatment. The high rate of walks-ins with conditions that may be treated in primary care has led to suggestions that those patients would best cared for in a community setting rather than in a hospital. Efficient reorganisation of emergency care tailored to patients needs requires information on the patient populations using the various emergency services currently available. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between the characteristics of walk-in patients seeking treatment at an ED and those of patients who use traditional out-of-hours GP (General Practitioner) services provided by a GP-Cooperative (GP-C).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 2007 and 2009 data was collected covering all consecutive patient-doctor encounters at the ED of a hospital and all those occurring as a result of contacting a GP-C over two evaluation periods of one month each. Comparison was made between a GP-C and the ED of the Waid City Hospital in Zurich. Patient characteristics, time and source of referral, diagnostic interventions and mode of discharge were evaluated. Medical problems were classified according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2). Patient characteristics were compared using non-parametric tests and multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate independent determinants for contacting a GP-C or an ED.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall a total of 2974 patient encounters were recorded. 1901 encounters were walk-ins and underwent further analysis (ED 1133, GP-C 768). Patients consulting the GP-C were significantly older (58.9 vs. 43.8 years), more often female (63.5 vs. 46.9%) and presented with non-injury related medical problems (93 vs. 55.6%) in comparison with patients at the ED. Independent determining factors for ED consultation were injury, male gender and younger age. Walk-in distribution in both settings was equal over a period of 24 hours and most common during daytime hours (65%).</p> <p>Outpatient care was predominant in both settings but significantly more so at the GP-C (79.9 vs. 85.7%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We observed substantial differences between the two emergency settings in a non gate-keeping health care system. Knowledge of the distribution of diagnoses, their therapy, of diagnostic measures and of the factors which determine the patients' choice of the ED or the GP-C is essential for the efficient allocation of resources and the reduction of costs.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T15:23:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-791b941f5da94e4089d169c7cf4eb708
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T15:23:06Z
publishDate 2011-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-791b941f5da94e4089d169c7cf4eb7082022-12-22T01:00:18ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-05-011119410.1186/1472-6963-11-94Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparisonEichler KlausZoller MarcoRosemann ThomasHuber Carola AChmiel CorinneSidler PatrickSenn Oliver<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Emergency Departments (ED) in Switzerland are faced with increasing numbers of patients seeking non-urgent treatment. The high rate of walks-ins with conditions that may be treated in primary care has led to suggestions that those patients would best cared for in a community setting rather than in a hospital. Efficient reorganisation of emergency care tailored to patients needs requires information on the patient populations using the various emergency services currently available. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between the characteristics of walk-in patients seeking treatment at an ED and those of patients who use traditional out-of-hours GP (General Practitioner) services provided by a GP-Cooperative (GP-C).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 2007 and 2009 data was collected covering all consecutive patient-doctor encounters at the ED of a hospital and all those occurring as a result of contacting a GP-C over two evaluation periods of one month each. Comparison was made between a GP-C and the ED of the Waid City Hospital in Zurich. Patient characteristics, time and source of referral, diagnostic interventions and mode of discharge were evaluated. Medical problems were classified according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2). Patient characteristics were compared using non-parametric tests and multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate independent determinants for contacting a GP-C or an ED.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Overall a total of 2974 patient encounters were recorded. 1901 encounters were walk-ins and underwent further analysis (ED 1133, GP-C 768). Patients consulting the GP-C were significantly older (58.9 vs. 43.8 years), more often female (63.5 vs. 46.9%) and presented with non-injury related medical problems (93 vs. 55.6%) in comparison with patients at the ED. Independent determining factors for ED consultation were injury, male gender and younger age. Walk-in distribution in both settings was equal over a period of 24 hours and most common during daytime hours (65%).</p> <p>Outpatient care was predominant in both settings but significantly more so at the GP-C (79.9 vs. 85.7%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We observed substantial differences between the two emergency settings in a non gate-keeping health care system. Knowledge of the distribution of diagnoses, their therapy, of diagnostic measures and of the factors which determine the patients' choice of the ED or the GP-C is essential for the efficient allocation of resources and the reduction of costs.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/94
spellingShingle Eichler Klaus
Zoller Marco
Rosemann Thomas
Huber Carola A
Chmiel Corinne
Sidler Patrick
Senn Oliver
Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
BMC Health Services Research
title Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
title_full Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
title_fullStr Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
title_full_unstemmed Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
title_short Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison
title_sort walk ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out of hours service a cross sectional comparison
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/94
work_keys_str_mv AT eichlerklaus walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison
AT zollermarco walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison
AT rosemannthomas walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison
AT hubercarolaa walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison
AT chmielcorinne walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison
AT sidlerpatrick walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison
AT sennoliver walkinsseekingtreatmentatanemergencydepartmentorgeneralpractitioneroutofhoursserviceacrosssectionalcomparison