Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease

Abstract The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blood pool and myocardial models made by stereolithography in the diagnosis of different types of congenital heart disease (CHD). Two modeling methods were applied in the diagnosis of 8 cases, and two control groups consisting of experts and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jixiang Liang, Xin Zhao, Guangyu Pan, Gen Zhang, Dianjiang Zhao, Jianping Xu, Dianyuan Li, Bingheng Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11294-6
_version_ 1818250655693799424
author Jixiang Liang
Xin Zhao
Guangyu Pan
Gen Zhang
Dianjiang Zhao
Jianping Xu
Dianyuan Li
Bingheng Lu
author_facet Jixiang Liang
Xin Zhao
Guangyu Pan
Gen Zhang
Dianjiang Zhao
Jianping Xu
Dianyuan Li
Bingheng Lu
author_sort Jixiang Liang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blood pool and myocardial models made by stereolithography in the diagnosis of different types of congenital heart disease (CHD). Two modeling methods were applied in the diagnosis of 8 cases, and two control groups consisting of experts and students diagnosed the cases using echocardiography with computed tomography, blood pool models, and myocardial models. The importance, suitability, and simulation degree of different models were analyzed. The average diagnostic rate before and after 3D printing was used was 88.75% and 95.9% (P = 0.001) in the expert group and 60% and 91.6% (P = 0.000) in the student group, respectively. 3D printing was considered to be more important for the diagnosis of complex CHDs (very important; average, 87.8%) than simple CHDs (very important; average, 30.8%) (P = 0.000). Myocardial models were considered most realistic regarding the structure of the heart (average, 92.5%). In cases of congenital corrected transposition of great arteries, Williams syndrome, coronary artery fistula, tetralogy of Fallot, patent ductus arteriosus, and coarctation of the aorta, blood pool models were considered more effective (average, 92.1%), while in cases of double outlet right ventricle and ventricular septal defect, myocardial models were considered optimal (average, 80%).
first_indexed 2024-12-12T15:55:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-793669d21276490da4e9dd4bf85b6916
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T15:55:51Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-793669d21276490da4e9dd4bf85b69162022-12-22T00:19:29ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-05-0112111110.1038/s41598-022-11294-6Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart diseaseJixiang Liang0Xin Zhao1Guangyu Pan2Gen Zhang3Dianjiang Zhao4Jianping Xu5Dianyuan Li6Bingheng Lu7The State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityInstitute of 3D Printing, Beijing City UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University International HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityDepartment of Radiology, Peking University International HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University International HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityThe State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityAbstract The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blood pool and myocardial models made by stereolithography in the diagnosis of different types of congenital heart disease (CHD). Two modeling methods were applied in the diagnosis of 8 cases, and two control groups consisting of experts and students diagnosed the cases using echocardiography with computed tomography, blood pool models, and myocardial models. The importance, suitability, and simulation degree of different models were analyzed. The average diagnostic rate before and after 3D printing was used was 88.75% and 95.9% (P = 0.001) in the expert group and 60% and 91.6% (P = 0.000) in the student group, respectively. 3D printing was considered to be more important for the diagnosis of complex CHDs (very important; average, 87.8%) than simple CHDs (very important; average, 30.8%) (P = 0.000). Myocardial models were considered most realistic regarding the structure of the heart (average, 92.5%). In cases of congenital corrected transposition of great arteries, Williams syndrome, coronary artery fistula, tetralogy of Fallot, patent ductus arteriosus, and coarctation of the aorta, blood pool models were considered more effective (average, 92.1%), while in cases of double outlet right ventricle and ventricular septal defect, myocardial models were considered optimal (average, 80%).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11294-6
spellingShingle Jixiang Liang
Xin Zhao
Guangyu Pan
Gen Zhang
Dianjiang Zhao
Jianping Xu
Dianyuan Li
Bingheng Lu
Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
Scientific Reports
title Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
title_full Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
title_fullStr Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
title_short Comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3D printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
title_sort comparison of blood pool and myocardial 3d printing in the diagnosis of types of congenital heart disease
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11294-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jixiangliang comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT xinzhao comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT guangyupan comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT genzhang comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT dianjiangzhao comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT jianpingxu comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT dianyuanli comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease
AT binghenglu comparisonofbloodpoolandmyocardial3dprintinginthediagnosisoftypesofcongenitalheartdisease