Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure

Aim. The main aim of our study was to compare the results of transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure versus minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) focusing on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings preoperatively and 1 month after defect closure.Material and met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus, Serkan Kahraman, Mehmet Erturk, Burak Onan, Ali Kemal Kalkan, Ahmet Guner, Ali Birand, Fatih Uzun, Mehmet Emin Kalkan, Mustafa Yildiz
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 2020-09-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3879
_version_ 1797856753729142784
author Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus
Serkan Kahraman
Mehmet Erturk
Burak Onan
Ali Kemal Kalkan
Ahmet Guner
Ali Birand
Fatih Uzun
Mehmet Emin Kalkan
Mustafa Yildiz
author_facet Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus
Serkan Kahraman
Mehmet Erturk
Burak Onan
Ali Kemal Kalkan
Ahmet Guner
Ali Birand
Fatih Uzun
Mehmet Emin Kalkan
Mustafa Yildiz
author_sort Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus
collection DOAJ
description Aim. The main aim of our study was to compare the results of transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure versus minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) focusing on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings preoperatively and 1 month after defect closure.Material and methods. 54 patients with ASD and finally 43 patients who were followed up were included in the study. 21 patients were in MICS (robotic or endoscopic approach) and 22 patients were in transcatheter closure arm. All patients investigated in detail by transesophageal echocardiography and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). At the end of first month, CPET and transthorasic echocardiography were reperformed.Results. There was significant improvement of physical capacity after 1 month following the transcatheter closure procedure documented by exercise time and VO 2 max. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (Tri S) were not changed. In surgery group right heart diameters declined significantly; but VO 2 max, TAPSE and Tri S significantly decreased.Conclusion. Cardiopulmonary exercise function is increased in transcatheter closure group 1 month after closure and contrary not in MICS group. This may be caused by long recovery time of the right ventricle after surgery. Device closure of ASD is preferable to surgical closure if the anatomy is suitable. However, MICS for ASD closure is safe, with short recovery period and less scarring.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:45:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-793892a615e44df7b869350186611bc2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-09T20:45:42Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
record_format Article
series Российский кардиологический журнал
spelling doaj.art-793892a615e44df7b869350186611bc22023-03-29T21:23:35Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLCРоссийский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202020-09-0125810.15829/1560-4071-2020-38792981Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter ClosureHicaz Zencirkiran Agus0Serkan Kahraman1Mehmet Erturk2Burak Onan3Ali Kemal Kalkan4Ahmet Guner5Ali Birand6Fatih Uzun7Mehmet Emin Kalkan8Mustafa Yildiz9University of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalUniversity of Health Sciences Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center Training and Research HospitalAim. The main aim of our study was to compare the results of transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure versus minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) focusing on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings preoperatively and 1 month after defect closure.Material and methods. 54 patients with ASD and finally 43 patients who were followed up were included in the study. 21 patients were in MICS (robotic or endoscopic approach) and 22 patients were in transcatheter closure arm. All patients investigated in detail by transesophageal echocardiography and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). At the end of first month, CPET and transthorasic echocardiography were reperformed.Results. There was significant improvement of physical capacity after 1 month following the transcatheter closure procedure documented by exercise time and VO 2 max. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (Tri S) were not changed. In surgery group right heart diameters declined significantly; but VO 2 max, TAPSE and Tri S significantly decreased.Conclusion. Cardiopulmonary exercise function is increased in transcatheter closure group 1 month after closure and contrary not in MICS group. This may be caused by long recovery time of the right ventricle after surgery. Device closure of ASD is preferable to surgical closure if the anatomy is suitable. However, MICS for ASD closure is safe, with short recovery period and less scarring.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3879atrial septal defectcardiopulmonary exercise testminimally invasive surgical procedurestranscatheter closure
spellingShingle Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus
Serkan Kahraman
Mehmet Erturk
Burak Onan
Ali Kemal Kalkan
Ahmet Guner
Ali Birand
Fatih Uzun
Mehmet Emin Kalkan
Mustafa Yildiz
Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure
Российский кардиологический журнал
atrial septal defect
cardiopulmonary exercise test
minimally invasive surgical procedures
transcatheter closure
title Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure
title_full Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure
title_fullStr Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure
title_short Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure
title_sort comparison of cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with atrial septal defect treated with minimally invasive cardiac surgery or transcatheter closure
topic atrial septal defect
cardiopulmonary exercise test
minimally invasive surgical procedures
transcatheter closure
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3879
work_keys_str_mv AT hicazzencirkiranagus comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT serkankahraman comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT mehmeterturk comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT burakonan comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT alikemalkalkan comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT ahmetguner comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT alibirand comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT fatihuzun comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT mehmeteminkalkan comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure
AT mustafayildiz comparisonofcardiopulmonaryexercisecapacityinpatientswithatrialseptaldefecttreatedwithminimallyinvasivecardiacsurgeryortranscatheterclosure