The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain
This study aims to investigate the research and development (R&D) competition within the supply chain, focusing on two aspects: R&D competition at the manufacturing level and competition in pricing strategies. This paper establishes a dynamic game model of R&D competition, comprising two...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi-Wiley
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Complexity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/3152363 |
_version_ | 1797271538427232256 |
---|---|
author | Jianli Xiao Hanli Xiao |
author_facet | Jianli Xiao Hanli Xiao |
author_sort | Jianli Xiao |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study aims to investigate the research and development (R&D) competition within the supply chain, focusing on two aspects: R&D competition at the manufacturing level and competition in pricing strategies. This paper establishes a dynamic game model of R&D competition, comprising two manufacturers and two retailers, with both manufacturers exhibiting bounded rationality. The key findings are as follows: (1) an increase in the adjustment speed positively affects the chaotic nature of the R&D competition system, leading to a state of disorder. This chaotic state has adverse implications for manufacturing profitability. (2) The spillover effect exhibits a positive relationship with the level of chaos in the R&D competition system. A greater spillover effect contributes to a more turbulent environment, which subsequently impacts the profitability of manufacturers. (3) R&D cost parameters exert a positive influence on the stability of the R&D competition system. When the system reaches a state of equilibrium, an escalation in the R&D cost parameters poses a threat to manufacturer profitability. (4) Retailer costs play a detrimental role in the stability of the R&D competition system. As retailer costs increase, there is a decline in R&D levels, thereby diminishing manufacturer profitability. (5) To mitigate the chaotic state, we propose the implementation of the time-delayed feedback control (TDFC) method, which reflects a more stable state in the R&D competition system. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:04:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-793bcbec0f184da18909d08077d653e0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1099-0526 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:04:59Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Hindawi-Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Complexity |
spelling | doaj.art-793bcbec0f184da18909d08077d653e02024-03-07T00:00:01ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1099-05262024-01-01202410.1155/2024/3152363The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply ChainJianli Xiao0Hanli Xiao1School of Economics and ManagementSchool of Tourism and Resources EnvironmentThis study aims to investigate the research and development (R&D) competition within the supply chain, focusing on two aspects: R&D competition at the manufacturing level and competition in pricing strategies. This paper establishes a dynamic game model of R&D competition, comprising two manufacturers and two retailers, with both manufacturers exhibiting bounded rationality. The key findings are as follows: (1) an increase in the adjustment speed positively affects the chaotic nature of the R&D competition system, leading to a state of disorder. This chaotic state has adverse implications for manufacturing profitability. (2) The spillover effect exhibits a positive relationship with the level of chaos in the R&D competition system. A greater spillover effect contributes to a more turbulent environment, which subsequently impacts the profitability of manufacturers. (3) R&D cost parameters exert a positive influence on the stability of the R&D competition system. When the system reaches a state of equilibrium, an escalation in the R&D cost parameters poses a threat to manufacturer profitability. (4) Retailer costs play a detrimental role in the stability of the R&D competition system. As retailer costs increase, there is a decline in R&D levels, thereby diminishing manufacturer profitability. (5) To mitigate the chaotic state, we propose the implementation of the time-delayed feedback control (TDFC) method, which reflects a more stable state in the R&D competition system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/3152363 |
spellingShingle | Jianli Xiao Hanli Xiao The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain Complexity |
title | The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain |
title_full | The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain |
title_fullStr | The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain |
title_full_unstemmed | The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain |
title_short | The Complexities in the R&D Competition Model with Spillover Effects in the Supply Chain |
title_sort | complexities in the r d competition model with spillover effects in the supply chain |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/3152363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianlixiao thecomplexitiesintherdcompetitionmodelwithspillovereffectsinthesupplychain AT hanlixiao thecomplexitiesintherdcompetitionmodelwithspillovereffectsinthesupplychain AT jianlixiao complexitiesintherdcompetitionmodelwithspillovereffectsinthesupplychain AT hanlixiao complexitiesintherdcompetitionmodelwithspillovereffectsinthesupplychain |