The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the results of enhanced Brückner test (EBT) performed by a pediatrician and an experienced pediatric ophthalmologist. Subjects and Methods: In this prospective double-masked cohort study, a pediatrician and a pediatric ophthalmologist performed the EBT in a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piyush Jain, Mihir T Kothari, Vaibhav Gode
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2016;volume=64;issue=10;spage=733;epage=736;aulast=Jain
_version_ 1818889454521155584
author Piyush Jain
Mihir T Kothari
Vaibhav Gode
author_facet Piyush Jain
Mihir T Kothari
Vaibhav Gode
author_sort Piyush Jain
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the results of enhanced Brückner test (EBT) performed by a pediatrician and an experienced pediatric ophthalmologist. Subjects and Methods: In this prospective double-masked cohort study, a pediatrician and a pediatric ophthalmologist performed the EBT in a classroom of a school in semi-dark lighting condition using a direct ophthalmoscope. The results of the test were compared using 2 × 2 Bayesian table and kappa statistics. The findings of the pediatric ophthalmologists were considered gold standard. Results: Two hundred and thirty-six eyes of 118 subjects, mean age 6.8 ± 0.5 years (range, 5.4–7.8 years), were examined. The time taken to complete this test was <10 s per subject. The ophthalmologist identified 59 eyes as ametropic (12 hyperopic and 47 myopic eyes) and 177 as emmetropic compared to 61 eyes as ametropic and 175 emmetropic by pediatrician. The prevalence of the test positive was 25.9%. The sensitivity of the pediatrician was 90.2%, specificity was 97.7%, predictive value of the positive test was 93.2%, and predictive value of the negative test was 96.6%. The clinical agreement (kappa) between the pediatric ophthalmologist and the pediatrician was 0.9. Conclusion: The results of the EBT performed by pediatrician were comparable to that of an experienced pediatric ophthalmologist. Opportunistic screening of refractive errors using EBT by a pediatrician can be an important approach in the detection of ametropia in children.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T17:09:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7953f5c0bf3045ada6d9e054b0ec48d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T17:09:17Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-7953f5c0bf3045ada6d9e054b0ec48d62022-12-21T20:13:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892016-01-01641073373610.4103/0301-4738.195020The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner testPiyush JainMihir T KothariVaibhav GodeAim: The aim of this study was to compare the results of enhanced Brückner test (EBT) performed by a pediatrician and an experienced pediatric ophthalmologist. Subjects and Methods: In this prospective double-masked cohort study, a pediatrician and a pediatric ophthalmologist performed the EBT in a classroom of a school in semi-dark lighting condition using a direct ophthalmoscope. The results of the test were compared using 2 × 2 Bayesian table and kappa statistics. The findings of the pediatric ophthalmologists were considered gold standard. Results: Two hundred and thirty-six eyes of 118 subjects, mean age 6.8 ± 0.5 years (range, 5.4–7.8 years), were examined. The time taken to complete this test was <10 s per subject. The ophthalmologist identified 59 eyes as ametropic (12 hyperopic and 47 myopic eyes) and 177 as emmetropic compared to 61 eyes as ametropic and 175 emmetropic by pediatrician. The prevalence of the test positive was 25.9%. The sensitivity of the pediatrician was 90.2%, specificity was 97.7%, predictive value of the positive test was 93.2%, and predictive value of the negative test was 96.6%. The clinical agreement (kappa) between the pediatric ophthalmologist and the pediatrician was 0.9. Conclusion: The results of the EBT performed by pediatrician were comparable to that of an experienced pediatric ophthalmologist. Opportunistic screening of refractive errors using EBT by a pediatrician can be an important approach in the detection of ametropia in children.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2016;volume=64;issue=10;spage=733;epage=736;aulast=JainMass screeningophthalmoscoperefractive error
spellingShingle Piyush Jain
Mihir T Kothari
Vaibhav Gode
The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Mass screening
ophthalmoscope
refractive error
title The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test
title_full The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test
title_fullStr The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test
title_full_unstemmed The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test
title_short The opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school-going children by pediatrician using enhanced Brückner test
title_sort opportunistic screening of refractive errors in school going children by pediatrician using enhanced bruckner test
topic Mass screening
ophthalmoscope
refractive error
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2016;volume=64;issue=10;spage=733;epage=736;aulast=Jain
work_keys_str_mv AT piyushjain theopportunisticscreeningofrefractiveerrorsinschoolgoingchildrenbypediatricianusingenhancedbrucknertest
AT mihirtkothari theopportunisticscreeningofrefractiveerrorsinschoolgoingchildrenbypediatricianusingenhancedbrucknertest
AT vaibhavgode theopportunisticscreeningofrefractiveerrorsinschoolgoingchildrenbypediatricianusingenhancedbrucknertest
AT piyushjain opportunisticscreeningofrefractiveerrorsinschoolgoingchildrenbypediatricianusingenhancedbrucknertest
AT mihirtkothari opportunisticscreeningofrefractiveerrorsinschoolgoingchildrenbypediatricianusingenhancedbrucknertest
AT vaibhavgode opportunisticscreeningofrefractiveerrorsinschoolgoingchildrenbypediatricianusingenhancedbrucknertest