Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing

Glyphosate alone or a tank mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D is commonly used for broad-spectrum weed control under fallow conditions in Australia. Air temperature or mixing glyphosate with 2,4-D, may influence the efficacy of glyphosate on feather fingergrass (<i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw.),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gulshan Mahajan, Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/23/3190
_version_ 1827642696644165632
author Gulshan Mahajan
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
author_facet Gulshan Mahajan
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
author_sort Gulshan Mahajan
collection DOAJ
description Glyphosate alone or a tank mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D is commonly used for broad-spectrum weed control under fallow conditions in Australia. Air temperature or mixing glyphosate with 2,4-D, may influence the efficacy of glyphosate on feather fingergrass (<i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw.), a problematic summer-season weed of Australia. Dose–response studies were conducted with four populations of feather fingergrass under temperature-controlled glasshouse conditions (35/25 °C and 25/15 °C at 12 h/12 h) to assess the level of glyphosate resistance in relation to temperature regimes. Four parameter log-logistic models were used to develop dose–response curves. Based on plant mortality percentage, LD<sub>50</sub> (lethal dose for 50% mortality) values of glyphosate at 25/15 °C for populations Ch, SGM2, SGW2, and CP2 were 137, 60, 650, and 1067 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. However, at 35/25 °C, the corresponding LD<sub>50</sub> values were 209, 557, 2108, and 2554 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. A similar response was observed for the parameter GR<sub>50</sub> (dose for 50% growth reduction) values of glyphosate. These results indicate that populations SGW2 and CP2 are highly glyphosate-resistant and in the summer season, it may be very difficult to control these populations due to poor glyphosate efficacy. These results further suggest that the efficacy of glyphosate for feather fingergrass control can be improved if applied during cooler temperatures (25/15 °C) or the spring season compared with warmer temperatures (35/25 °C) or the summer season. In another study, 2,4-D antagonized glyphosate remarkably in the CP2 (glyphosate-resistant) population but only marginally in the Ch (glyphosate-susceptible) population. Thus, it is not advisable to mix 2,4-D with glyphosate for the control of glyphosate-resistant feather fingergrass populations. The results further suggest that the use of this mixture is useful if the feather fingergrass is not glyphosate-resistant; however, the use of the mixture is to be avoided if the population is glyphosate-resistant in order to not exacerbate the potential resistance problem.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:35:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7956a80fbdba4235b2f5ef3e676f7960
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:35:42Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-7956a80fbdba4235b2f5ef3e676f79602023-11-24T11:53:49ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472022-11-011123319010.3390/plants11233190Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank MixingGulshan Mahajan0Bhagirath Singh Chauhan1The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaThe Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaGlyphosate alone or a tank mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D is commonly used for broad-spectrum weed control under fallow conditions in Australia. Air temperature or mixing glyphosate with 2,4-D, may influence the efficacy of glyphosate on feather fingergrass (<i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw.), a problematic summer-season weed of Australia. Dose–response studies were conducted with four populations of feather fingergrass under temperature-controlled glasshouse conditions (35/25 °C and 25/15 °C at 12 h/12 h) to assess the level of glyphosate resistance in relation to temperature regimes. Four parameter log-logistic models were used to develop dose–response curves. Based on plant mortality percentage, LD<sub>50</sub> (lethal dose for 50% mortality) values of glyphosate at 25/15 °C for populations Ch, SGM2, SGW2, and CP2 were 137, 60, 650, and 1067 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. However, at 35/25 °C, the corresponding LD<sub>50</sub> values were 209, 557, 2108, and 2554 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. A similar response was observed for the parameter GR<sub>50</sub> (dose for 50% growth reduction) values of glyphosate. These results indicate that populations SGW2 and CP2 are highly glyphosate-resistant and in the summer season, it may be very difficult to control these populations due to poor glyphosate efficacy. These results further suggest that the efficacy of glyphosate for feather fingergrass control can be improved if applied during cooler temperatures (25/15 °C) or the spring season compared with warmer temperatures (35/25 °C) or the summer season. In another study, 2,4-D antagonized glyphosate remarkably in the CP2 (glyphosate-resistant) population but only marginally in the Ch (glyphosate-susceptible) population. Thus, it is not advisable to mix 2,4-D with glyphosate for the control of glyphosate-resistant feather fingergrass populations. The results further suggest that the use of this mixture is useful if the feather fingergrass is not glyphosate-resistant; however, the use of the mixture is to be avoided if the population is glyphosate-resistant in order to not exacerbate the potential resistance problem.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/23/3190dose–response curveherbicide efficacyherbicide resistant populationhigh temperaturelow temperatureweed control
spellingShingle Gulshan Mahajan
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing
Plants
dose–response curve
herbicide efficacy
herbicide resistant population
high temperature
low temperature
weed control
title Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing
title_full Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing
title_fullStr Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing
title_full_unstemmed Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing
title_short Glyphosate Efficacy in <i>Chloris virgata</i> Sw. in Response to Temperature and Tank Mixing
title_sort glyphosate efficacy in i chloris virgata i sw in response to temperature and tank mixing
topic dose–response curve
herbicide efficacy
herbicide resistant population
high temperature
low temperature
weed control
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/23/3190
work_keys_str_mv AT gulshanmahajan glyphosateefficacyinichlorisvirgataiswinresponsetotemperatureandtankmixing
AT bhagirathsinghchauhan glyphosateefficacyinichlorisvirgataiswinresponsetotemperatureandtankmixing